y********n
发帖数: 74 | | y********n
发帖数: 74 | 2 我是会计新手，问个傻问题：us gaap 和 IFRS 区别大吗？刚读到一则消息，in
November 2007, US securities and exchange committee decided to allow foreign
private issuers to prepare their accounts under IFRS as published by the
IASB without reconciliation to US GAAP.
因为在英国工作并学ACCA (IFRS), 想问一下今后有否到美国发展的可能。
谢谢大家。
【在 y********n 的大作中提到】
| b********w
发帖数: 46 | | B*****i
发帖数: 1246 | 4 There are tones of people study ACCA in china. In my undergraduate
university, many students from ACCA class may pass all 14 subjects before
graduation and got an co-degree from Oxford broke University.
Some of them always got the national highest score and were awarded with
scholarship.
ACCA is very different from AICPA. For exsample, you call "expenditure",
however, we only say expense.
There may be oppurtunity for you in US, in some UK companies having business
in US.
By the way, as far as i | y********n
发帖数: 74 | 5 Thanks.
Yes, ACCA is not the best one in UK as it is more international but English
people prefer local ACA, which adopts UK GAAP.
You can use both 'expediture' and 'expense', no problem.
My clients are US companies. I know they say 'vendor', but we call 'supplier
'.
The terminology difference is like the difference between Amereican English
and British English. Not a big deal.
The main difference lies in IFRS and US GAAP, but i heard US GAAP is trying
to merge with IFRS although the process is
【在 B*****i 的大作中提到】
: There are tones of people study ACCA in china. In my undergraduate
: university, many students from ACCA class may pass all 14 subjects before
: graduation and got an co-degree from Oxford broke University.
: Some of them always got the national highest score and were awarded with
: scholarship.
: ACCA is very different from AICPA. For exsample, you call "expenditure",
: however, we only say expense.
: There may be oppurtunity for you in US, in some UK companies having business
: in US.
: By the way, as far as i
|
|
