m******p
发帖数: 5393 | 1 这个神经学会邀请方舟子演讲是别有用心啊？
肖传国也是郑州大学教授吧，研究所挂靠郑州大学一附院？
zz "由中国神经科学学会主办，郑州大学协办的中国神经科学会第九届全国学术会议暨
第五次会员代表大会于7月29日至8月1日在郑州国际会展中心举行。来自神经科学学会
的会员、国外相关领域专家及国内各院校神经科学相关专业的专家学者、研究生等1500
余人参加了会议。
会上，高丹盈副校长代表郑州大学致欢迎辞并祝会议圆满成功。
中国神经科学会理事长路长林和学会秘书长何士成等主持了会议。
会议分成一个主会场和六个分会场。主会场上，国内外的权威专家中国科学院教授
刘学力、中国科技大学教授周江宁、UCSF教授Yuh-Nung Jan、Pittsburgh大学教授
Susan G.Amara,以及法国CNRS教授yves Fregnac等分别作了精彩的报告。各分会场分别
进行了听觉皮质、视觉皮质、胶质细胞、癫痫、自闭症等10个专题的70余场报告。大会
讨论了抵制科学研究领域学术不端的问题，并邀请《cell》杂志主编和学术打假斗士方
舟子作了精彩报告。 为了鼓励神经科学领域的杰出青年科研工作者，会议还颁发了张
香桐纪念奖。 " | r****f
发帖数: 1041 | 2 方剽客剽窃其母校MSU教授的文章，前天被人家发了公开信谴责要求道歉。
方狗这次菊花被爆惨了，哈哈哈！ | U********S
发帖数: 1896 | 3 看来方“道歉”了，不过是百般抵赖，被MSU教授再次公开信猛打。道歉也不忘完全不相干的肖传国啊。
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502041670102dset.html
方舟子“道歉”还诡辩，“根伯”再批不留情
方舟子“道歉”还诡辩，“根伯”再批不留情
（求真网2010年8月5日电）中国科坛打黑的第一颗和第二颗原子弹分别于2010年7月28日和2010年8月3日爆炸后，中国科坛第一前台黒客方舟子一面组织水军造谣惑众、恶毒攻击求真人士、还要对美制“原子弹”的英文挑毛病，一面用假名与美国教授“辩理”结果被打了一棒。最后，实在赖不下去了，方舟子亲自给美国教授“根伯”发了如下的“道歉”信。
Dear Dr. Root-Bernstein,
In 1995 when I was a graduate student at MSU, I posted a short writing to an online forum called alt.chinese.text when there was a debate about pseudoscience among oversea Chinese students. It was an informal, casual follow-up to a discussion thread, not an academic paper or assignment. Part of it paraphrased the criteria of science from your article. I presented the criteria of science as "consensus in philosophy of science" and give my own examples to explain it. This writing was revised and formally published in one of my books in 1999, and it cited the source as "According to the summary by Root-Bernstein", and when the criteria were mentioned again in
another book of mine in 2007, it gave reference as "On Defining a Scientific Theory: Creationism Considered, Robert Root-Bernstein, Science and Creationism, Oxford University Press, 1984".(Without this reference, I don't believe the supporters of Xiao Chuanguo, the surgeon who hired assailants to attack me using pepper spray and hammer after I exposed his malpractice, could track down the source and report the "plagiarism" to you and MSU administration 16 years later. I have deleted email addresses of four Xiao's supporters in this reply)
I never presented the criteria as my own original idea, nor did I copy your wordings. And when it's formally published, the source had been credited and cited. Therefore I don't think it consists of plagiarism or copyright infringement according to the common accepted definitions with which you disagree. But it's inappropriate not to explicitly credit you in my original posting, and I apologize for it.
Sincerely,
Shi-min Fang
然而，方舟子的这个“道歉”可蒙不了美国教授，“根伯”对于如此无赖的抄窃者，立即发出了如下的公开信：
Dear Shi-min Fang,
Thank you for admitting your error in failing to cite my article in your initial online essay, and for the apology regarding it. I do not, however, believe that your response adequately addresses the points I made in my open letter. The issue is not a matter of a missing citation, which, since you have corrected it, would be a minor matter indeed. The issue is that you have appropriated my entire argument and most of the examples that I use to support it. Whether we want to label this "plagiarism" or "copyright infringement" or some combination of the two is irrelevant. The fact is that you did not alter my argument in any way; you did not mix it or modify it with other peoples's arguments; and you presented it in exactly the same order and (and here I must insist on this) using the same language. Now you add the additional insult in arguing that I am mis-using the concepts of
plagiarism and copyright infringement in making my accusations. And you do so without justifying this attack upon my supposed ignorance. So how, exactly, do you define plagiarism and copyright infringement? At what point did you inquire of me or of Oxford University Press the right to use a large portion of my article, or even to popularize it?
Please note that I am sending this to all of the people who have expressed interest in this issue. As I said in my open letter to you, I want to use this as an educational forum. Your attempt to prevent those who you consider your "enemies" from having a voice in this discussion undermines the openness with which I approached you and is counter-productive.
Sincerely,
Bob Root-Bernstein
哈哈！“真诚的（Sincerely）方舟子（Shi-min Fang）被“真诚的（Sincerely）“根伯”（Bob Root-Bernstein）真诚地再批了一次，那么方舟子是否应当再“真诚地”道歉一次呢？ | r***e
发帖数: 2000 | | D***r
发帖数: 7511 | 5 美国的教授也是神经病居多，好斗
跟方舟子差不多
【在 r***e 的大作中提到】
: 流年不利啊
| r****f
发帖数: 1041 | 6 方剽客那三脚猫的两下子伎俩也就蒙蒙国内没见过世面的，这次被Root-Bernstein教授
剥得精光，越狡辩越丢丑，哈哈哈哈！ | r****f
发帖数: 1041 | 7 方剽客那三脚猫的两下子伎俩也就蒙蒙国内没见过世面的，这次被Root-Bernstein教授
剥得精光，越狡辩越丢丑，哈哈哈哈！ | r****f
发帖数: 1041 | 8 方剽客死不认账自己剽窃，还说人Root-Bernstein教授不懂剽窃定义。
这不要脸的太监！ |
|
