D********g 发帖数: 533 | 1 准备在Linux下面使数值计算软件。MatLab太贵。
在Win下面曾今用过这两个,SciLab好像语法和MatLab不是完全兼容;Octave很老的时
候用过,那个时候效率不高 因为要Cygwin。不知道在纯Linux环境中,Octave效率是不
是能和SciLab一拼呢?
其实语法不兼容倒也算了,关键比较看重效率。达人说说这两个那个好点吧~
谢拉!
//bow |
P*******t 发帖数: 202 | 2 人是一个大牛num analysis教授推荐用octave
【在 D********g 的大作中提到】 : 准备在Linux下面使数值计算软件。MatLab太贵。 : 在Win下面曾今用过这两个,SciLab好像语法和MatLab不是完全兼容;Octave很老的时 : 候用过,那个时候效率不高 因为要Cygwin。不知道在纯Linux环境中,Octave效率是不 : 是能和SciLab一拼呢? : 其实语法不兼容倒也算了,关键比较看重效率。达人说说这两个那个好点吧~ : 谢拉! : //bow
|
D********g 发帖数: 533 | 3 谁啊? @@
【在 P*******t 的大作中提到】 : 人是一个大牛num analysis教授推荐用octave
|
x*****u 发帖数: 3419 | 4 this may help.
http://www.sciviews.org/benchmark/index.html
【在 D********g 的大作中提到】 : 准备在Linux下面使数值计算软件。MatLab太贵。 : 在Win下面曾今用过这两个,SciLab好像语法和MatLab不是完全兼容;Octave很老的时 : 候用过,那个时候效率不高 因为要Cygwin。不知道在纯Linux环境中,Octave效率是不 : 是能和SciLab一拼呢? : 其实语法不兼容倒也算了,关键比较看重效率。达人说说这两个那个好点吧~ : 谢拉! : //bow
|
D********g 发帖数: 533 | 5 Thanks. I've read this before. But the problem is softwares they use are too
obselete. :)
【在 x*****u 的大作中提到】 : this may help. : http://www.sciviews.org/benchmark/index.html
|
x*****u 发帖数: 3419 | 6 Can't you do something similar? It is just a benchmark.
Anyway, I have no experience of scilib, but I like octave.
too
【在 D********g 的大作中提到】 : Thanks. I've read this before. But the problem is softwares they use are too : obselete. :)
|
o*******e 发帖数: 186 | 7 As far as I know, there is free version of Octave for windows available. |
r****t 发帖数: 10904 | |
h***z 发帖数: 233 | 9 Yeah, just switch to Python if you don't mind learning a new syntax (which
is quite easy with Python). Python with numpy has similar performance as
the commercial Matlab for matrix operations, but is much faster (and much
nicer to code in) for general scripting. Also, since it's a general
programming/scripting language with great libraries for pretty much anything
you can think of, it can be used as a unified solution for all your needs (
e.g. data acquisition, report generation, system monito
【在 r****t 的大作中提到】 : python + numpy + scipy
|