m*******4
发帖数: 55 | 1 投了一个IF 6左右的期刊，2个多月终于给了回复，
Reviewer #1: well organized and concisely presented. successfully applied
。。。. one typo in the captain of Figure 5. The manuscript is acceptable
for publication with minor revision.
Reviewer #2: clear and fluently explanatory of aims and results. the topic
is surely interesting and i'd say it's a "hot topic" in the field。。i say
that it's worth being published.
Reviewer #3: There is no doubt that the work was done carefully
Unfortunately, does not really advance our |
c8
发帖数: 282 | 2 review comments就这么一点点啊？我review的时候经常写三四页。
applied
acceptable
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】
: 投了一个IF 6左右的期刊，2个多月终于给了回复，
: Reviewer #1: well organized and concisely presented. successfully applied
: 。。。. one typo in the captain of Figure 5. The manuscript is acceptable
: for publication with minor revision.
: Reviewer #2: clear and fluently explanatory of aims and results. the topic
: is surely interesting and i'd say it's a "hot topic" in the field。。i say
: that it's worth being published.
: Reviewer #3: There is no doubt that the work was done carefully
: Unfortunately, does not really advance our
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 3 他中间省略了很多。
【在 c8 的大作中提到】
: review comments就这么一点点啊？我review的时候经常写三四页。
:
: applied
: acceptable
|
m*******4
发帖数: 55 | 4 我摘取了主要观点，
我的这个comments是比较少，每人只有一段，一共不到一页 |
z*y
发帖数: 1311 | |
c******6
发帖数: 928 | 6 What is the opinion of the editor? |
m*******4
发帖数: 55 | 7 但是实质上就是直接据了，因为只能是minor revision才能再审
【在 z*y 的大作中提到】
: 最后那个算不上强烈反对吧
|
f*****t
发帖数: 901 | 8 可以写个rebuttal，argue一下。如果editor也对你的文章有好感，会让你resubmit的。
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】
: 但是实质上就是直接据了，因为只能是minor revision才能再审
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 9 是不是让你resbumit,如果是，你照审稿人的意见改改，再被接受的可能性很高。
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】
: 但是实质上就是直接据了，因为只能是minor revision才能再审
|
e******i
发帖数: 179 | 10
我以前投过一篇文章
第一次两个reviewer 都说不错，改改再投来
下次换了个editor，除了原来的两个reviewer 又整了俩新的
两新的reviewer拒了我
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 是不是让你resbumit,如果是，你照审稿人的意见改改，再被接受的可能性很高。
|
m*******4
发帖数: 55 | 11 好的，谢谢，
再投一次，希望不再被狙击。。。。
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 是不是让你resbumit,如果是，你照审稿人的意见改改，再被接受的可能性很高。
|
G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 12 我咋觉得多还positive呀。
没啥强烈反对的。
applied
acceptable
【在 m*******4 的大作中提到】
: 投了一个IF 6左右的期刊，2个多月终于给了回复，
: Reviewer #1: well organized and concisely presented. successfully applied
: 。。。. one typo in the captain of Figure 5. The manuscript is acceptable
: for publication with minor revision.
: Reviewer #2: clear and fluently explanatory of aims and results. the topic
: is surely interesting and i'd say it's a "hot topic" in the field。。i say
: that it's worth being published.
: Reviewer #3: There is no doubt that the work was done carefully
: Unfortunately, does not really advance our
|
