c*******u 发帖数: 231 | 1 Shall I use "we" or "I" all the time? The published papers were co-authored
by me and my Ph.D advisor, nobody else.
Thanks! | w*e 发帖数: 740 | 2 即使是你一个人做的,一般 WE也礼貌点
否则给人感觉不大好
authored
【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】 : Shall I use "we" or "I" all the time? The published papers were co-authored : by me and my Ph.D advisor, nobody else. : Thanks!
| b*********d 发帖数: 2105 | | s********y 发帖数: 100 | 4 用“we”。用“I”给人的印象不好。用“I”过多的人,感觉上自我中心些。更何况你
导师的名字也在上面。不要担心用了“we”会减少你的credit。 | c****r 发帖数: 199 | 5 很多人对"we"是很不待见的,因为有的presenter从头到尾都用we, 然后在
individual meeting的时候,被别人问到,才承认说这个是collaborator做的,那个才
是我做的。曾经有个面试的,实验方法很fancy, talk也做得好,大家都很amaze, 后来
才知道所有关键步骤都是collaborator做的,他也就没拿到offer.
所以我觉得,应该把什么是我做的,什么是collaborator做的,说的清清楚
楚。 | S*****n 发帖数: 6055 | 6 Technically, it depends on how many authors you put on the first slide of
your presentation. If single author, use I, otherwise, use we.
Practically, I have seen ppl use both.
The worst senario is you try to push yourself to use I, but a few we's come
out of your mouse, so ppl will take all the "we" work as your collaborator's
work.
authored
【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】 : Shall I use "we" or "I" all the time? The published papers were co-authored : by me and my Ph.D advisor, nobody else. : Thanks!
| i****4 发帖数: 1906 | 7 为什么不用 This paper..... This project......
或者被动语态 没有动作执行者 | f***y 发帖数: 218 | |
|