s**********e
发帖数: 2888 | | A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 2 Sure why not. However, are you a new investigator? You should only apply
for R21 when it is a RFA. Also, you better make sure that they are
completely different story. If they are similar and go to the same review
section, you may get comments like "the investigator should combine two R21
into an R01 etc." Meanwhile, you could also piss off the PO especially on
the review side when there is a flood of applications with the new NIH
policy. | p*******7
发帖数: 322 | 3 Your PO won't like it. Why not submit them in two different cycles?
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 两个完全不一样的idea，可以不？
| l***s
发帖数: 841 | 4 没问题，往不同的study section投就是了。我上个月刚投了2个R21，完全不同的方向
，assign到了不搭界的两个地方。
【在 p*******7 的大作中提到】
: Your PO won't like it. Why not submit them in two different cycles?
| s**********e
发帖数: 2888 | 5 问一个更低级的问题：可以R21要求study section?
上次投R21去了一个和我的领域完全不相关的study section，当然结果就很差，虽然
reviewers写了很多很仔细的意见，算是很有帮助。
还是我应该多花时间，把其中一个R21扩展成一个R01投出去？我符合ESI and New
Investigator，这个R21是基于我薄厚刚发的一篇PNAS，薄厚老板说他不做这个方向了
，我和这篇文章的co-first author (哈佛医学院的一个AP,但是他已经有两个R01)于是
计划投一个grant出去。 | A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 6 Submitting R01 or R21, you can suggest study sections. However, the NIH
does not have to listen to you. Once assigned, if you don't like it, you
can ask for a switch, but again, NIH does not have to listen to your
suggestion. I do know people got the study section they want from a switch,
but I don't know it helped.
Also, you don't have to believe me if you want. If your R21 ever got funded
, it means that it is fund-able at a R01 level. So you literally just
voluntarily cut yourself 3 years of budget. Btw, ask your PO to see if my
above statement is true. Plus, NCI only give advantage at the study section
for ESI/NI (e.g. have your grant reviewed together with ESI/NI). There in
no payline promotion. |
|
