由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Faculty版 - 国会议员批评发表的科研成果不能重复
相关主题
To retract them or not is a tough question.NSF的budget下来了
学术造假??SCI价值200亿元,投资公司接手是喜是忧?
国会议员开始要干涉NSF给钱了问一个paper的color option的问题
NIH FY17 budget增加了20个亿做癌症研究比八股文都八股文的投稿指南
刚审完几个NSF proposal,发现亚裔写的比老美好问问大家对博士后期间发文章的看法
How science fares in the U.S. Budget有的年轻的PI, 每年可以出两篇nature, science, cell, 他们的数据有没有可能是 造假的?
no long required啥意思也请问R01
集体造假这个事没人提?问一下同样的proposal给不同的agency
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: science话题: nsf话题: research话题: our
进入Faculty版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b*****d
发帖数: 61690
1
Second, NSF must help increase public trust in science. A Pew Research
Center study last year showed a decline in the public’s trust of scientists
and scientific findings. And Nature magazine found in a survey of
researchers that more than 70% have tried and failed to reproduce another
scientist’s published results, which is considered essential for legitimate
scientific inquiry.
Publication of flawed basic research can have devastating economic and human
impacts. A recent study found that $28 billion a year is spent on research
in the field of biology alone that can’t be reproduced, while retractions
of published studies have risen 25% in the last five years.
Reproducibility is the gold standard of science, and NSF should be leading
the charge towards finding solutions to improving reproducibility and
replication. The AICA directed a study to be conducted by the National
Academies of Science, which I hope will help restore the trust of the
American people in our science institutions.
Some have declared that raising these questions or taking a critical look at
how NSF has done business for nearly 70 years is somehow “anti-science.”
It’s not. It is the nature of science to ask questions, seek new solutions,
and never stop experimenting. We should not ask anything less of our
federal science agencies as we join together, in the words of President
Trump, “in a great national effort to rebuild our country and to restore
its promise for all of our people.”
Congressman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is the chairman of the House Science,
Space, and Technology Committee.
c*********7
发帖数: 19373
2
NIH 申请中有专门的要求。nsf 不强调

scientists
legitimate
human
research

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: Second, NSF must help increase public trust in science. A Pew Research
: Center study last year showed a decline in the public’s trust of scientists
: and scientific findings. And Nature magazine found in a survey of
: researchers that more than 70% have tried and failed to reproduce another
: scientist’s published results, which is considered essential for legitimate
: scientific inquiry.
: Publication of flawed basic research can have devastating economic and human
: impacts. A recent study found that $28 billion a year is spent on research
: in the field of biology alone that can’t be reproduced, while retractions
: of published studies have risen 25% in the last five years.

c*******t
发帖数: 644
3
公开有啥好处,让别的国家偷学更容易?

scientists
legitimate
human
research

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: Second, NSF must help increase public trust in science. A Pew Research
: Center study last year showed a decline in the public’s trust of scientists
: and scientific findings. And Nature magazine found in a survey of
: researchers that more than 70% have tried and failed to reproduce another
: scientist’s published results, which is considered essential for legitimate
: scientific inquiry.
: Publication of flawed basic research can have devastating economic and human
: impacts. A recent study found that $28 billion a year is spent on research
: in the field of biology alone that can’t be reproduced, while retractions
: of published studies have risen 25% in the last five years.

c*********7
发帖数: 19373
4
不能重复就是没用,要么作假,要么运气好,没法证明是那种。

【在 c*******t 的大作中提到】
: 公开有啥好处,让别的国家偷学更容易?
:
: scientists
: legitimate
: human
: research

s*******a
发帖数: 1296
5
要看具体什么样的科研成果吧?
LIGO发现引力波也无法重复,Higgs-Boson的发现也没法重复呢。。。

【在 c*********7 的大作中提到】
: 不能重复就是没用,要么作假,要么运气好,没法证明是那种。
d******e
发帖数: 7844
6
引力波的那个实验,是两个地点同时发现了吧。
算是交叉验证了。

【在 s*******a 的大作中提到】
: 要看具体什么样的科研成果吧?
: LIGO发现引力波也无法重复,Higgs-Boson的发现也没法重复呢。。。

s*******a
发帖数: 1296
7
是两个地点观察的同一个引力波,只能算一个实验;
他们那个要能重复的意思是,你再去搞个引力波来让那两个地方观察看看能不能再度验
证。。。

【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: 引力波的那个实验,是两个地点同时发现了吧。
: 算是交叉验证了。

h********0
发帖数: 12056
8
那看你怎么定义不可能重复。 你说是强词夺理。

【在 s*******a 的大作中提到】
: 要看具体什么样的科研成果吧?
: LIGO发现引力波也无法重复,Higgs-Boson的发现也没法重复呢。。。

1 (共1页)
进入Faculty版参与讨论
相关主题
问一下同样的proposal给不同的agency刚审完几个NSF proposal,发现亚裔写的比老美好
没人讨论重力波吗How science fares in the U.S. Budget
PRL凭什么? 拒稿引力波预测, 爱因斯坦走下神坛! (转载)no long required啥意思
请问我对 rigor and reproducibility 的理解是对的吗?集体造假这个事没人提?
To retract them or not is a tough question.NSF的budget下来了
学术造假??SCI价值200亿元,投资公司接手是喜是忧?
国会议员开始要干涉NSF给钱了问一个paper的color option的问题
NIH FY17 budget增加了20个亿做癌症研究比八股文都八股文的投稿指南
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: science话题: nsf话题: research话题: our