H****N
发帖数: 997 | 1 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1022
Summary
Universalism—the evaluation of scientists' achievements based on merit
alone rather than on functionally irrelevant factors (1–3)—has long been
an unquestioned norm in science. Its existence is best illustrated by the
reactions of outrage whenever a violation of universalism in science is
exposed. For example, a study by Moss-Racusin et al. received a lot of
attention in the scientific community because it found that when assessing
application materials, science faculty rated students with male names as
more competent than students who were otherwise identical but had been given
female names (4). In a recent study, Fisman et al. (5) find evidence for
favoritism in Chinese science: The election of membership to the two most
prestigious scientific organizations, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), appears to be influenced by “
guanxi,” or social network, as measured by hometown ties between candidates
and selection committee members. |
Y****N
发帖数: 8694 | 2 作者XIE Yu
饶毅老师的老朋友
居然没把饶毅弄成co-author
这个文章饶毅应该有很多话要说才对
given
【在 H****N 的大作中提到】
: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1022
: Summary
: Universalism—the evaluation of scientists' achievements based on merit
: alone rather than on functionally irrelevant factors (1–3)—has long been
: an unquestioned norm in science. Its existence is best illustrated by the
: reactions of outrage whenever a violation of universalism in science is
: exposed. For example, a study by Moss-Racusin et al. received a lot of
: attention in the scientific community because it found that when assessing
: application materials, science faculty rated students with male names as
: more competent than students who were otherwise identical but had been given
|
C***t
发帖数: 915 | 3 很好的文章。
顶锅盖说一句： It's who you know that counts 就行了。Whom在语法上是对的，但
是现实中没有这么说滴。就像 Who are you talking about? 或者I know who you are
talking about. 如果是国内的同胞写的那就很不错了，说出来主要是不想这里的学生
跟着学。
好了，遁了。。。 |
H****N
发帖数: 997 | 4 can you proofread my grant next time?
are
【在 C***t 的大作中提到】
: 很好的文章。
: 顶锅盖说一句： It's who you know that counts 就行了。Whom在语法上是对的，但
: 是现实中没有这么说滴。就像 Who are you talking about? 或者I know who you are
: talking about. 如果是国内的同胞写的那就很不错了，说出来主要是不想这里的学生
: 跟着学。
: 好了，遁了。。。
|
z*******e
发帖数: 935 | 5 谢宇好像是umich的社会学椅子？
are
【在 C***t 的大作中提到】
: 很好的文章。
: 顶锅盖说一句： It's who you know that counts 就行了。Whom在语法上是对的，但
: 是现实中没有这么说滴。就像 Who are you talking about? 或者I know who you are
: talking about. 如果是国内的同胞写的那就很不错了，说出来主要是不想这里的学生
: 跟着学。
: 好了，遁了。。。
|
z*******e
发帖数: 935 | 6 牛逼，跳到普林去了……
【在 z*******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢宇好像是umich的社会学椅子？
:
: are
|
H****N
发帖数: 997 | 7 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1022
Summary
Universalism—the evaluation of scientists' achievements based on merit
alone rather than on functionally irrelevant factors (1–3)—has long been
an unquestioned norm in science. Its existence is best illustrated by the
reactions of outrage whenever a violation of universalism in science is
exposed. For example, a study by Moss-Racusin et al. received a lot of
attention in the scientific community because it found that when assessing
application materials, science faculty rated students with male names as
more competent than students who were otherwise identical but had been given
female names (4). In a recent study, Fisman et al. (5) find evidence for
favoritism in Chinese science: The election of membership to the two most
prestigious scientific organizations, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), appears to be influenced by “
guanxi,” or social network, as measured by hometown ties between candidates
and selection committee members. |
Y****N
发帖数: 8694 | 8 作者XIE Yu
饶毅老师的老朋友
居然没把饶毅弄成co-author
这个文章饶毅应该有很多话要说才对
given
【在 H****N 的大作中提到】
: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1022
: Summary
: Universalism—the evaluation of scientists' achievements based on merit
: alone rather than on functionally irrelevant factors (1–3)—has long been
: an unquestioned norm in science. Its existence is best illustrated by the
: reactions of outrage whenever a violation of universalism in science is
: exposed. For example, a study by Moss-Racusin et al. received a lot of
: attention in the scientific community because it found that when assessing
: application materials, science faculty rated students with male names as
: more competent than students who were otherwise identical but had been given
|
C***t
发帖数: 915 | 9 很好的文章。
顶锅盖说一句： It's who you know that counts 就行了。Whom在语法上是对的，但
是现实中没有这么说滴。就像 Who are you talking about? 或者I know who you are
talking about. 如果是国内的同胞写的那就很不错了，说出来主要是不想这里的学生
跟着学。
好了，遁了。。。 |
H****N
发帖数: 997 | 10 can you proofread my grant next time?
are
【在 C***t 的大作中提到】
: 很好的文章。
: 顶锅盖说一句： It's who you know that counts 就行了。Whom在语法上是对的，但
: 是现实中没有这么说滴。就像 Who are you talking about? 或者I know who you are
: talking about. 如果是国内的同胞写的那就很不错了，说出来主要是不想这里的学生
: 跟着学。
: 好了，遁了。。。
|
z*******e
发帖数: 935 | 11 谢宇好像是umich的社会学椅子？
are
【在 C***t 的大作中提到】
: 很好的文章。
: 顶锅盖说一句： It's who you know that counts 就行了。Whom在语法上是对的，但
: 是现实中没有这么说滴。就像 Who are you talking about? 或者I know who you are
: talking about. 如果是国内的同胞写的那就很不错了，说出来主要是不想这里的学生
: 跟着学。
: 好了，遁了。。。
|
z*******e
发帖数: 935 | 12 牛逼，跳到普林去了……
【在 z*******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢宇好像是umich的社会学椅子？
:
: are
|
