c******n
发帖数: 7263 | 1 上半场红皮进攻，在牛仔端区被int，不过红皮队员马上一个tackle，球被撞出端线，
这个按规则来说是不是safety？
比赛最后阶段，肉末重新上场，红皮疯狂的blitz，搞得肉末手忙脚乱，甚至放炮了。
这个时候牛仔怎么打比较合适？小叮当么？ | R*2
发帖数: 1631 | 2 Per a league source, the specific ruling was that Wilcox had intercepted the
ball and fumbled. But because Washington provided, as the rule book dubs
it, the “impetus” that put the ball in the end zone, possession by the
Cowboys in their own end zone and a fumble by the Cowboys out of the end
zone remained a touchback, with the Cowboys getting the ball on their own 20.
As the source explained it, the ruling would have applied even if Wilcox had
run around inside the end zone, trying to get out but losing possession
before exiting. If the ball had gone out of bounds in the end zone, the
outcome would have been the same as if Wilcox had simply taken a knee.
It’s a strange rule. One team acquires possession of the ball in its own
end zone, loses possession of the ball while in their own end zone, but
suffers no consequence when the fumbled ball goes out of the end zone.
But that’s the rule, and that was the outcome of a play that kept
Washington from extending its lead (at the time) from 3-0 to 5-0. | x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | | z*i
发帖数: 58873 | 4 所以说肉末被撞蒙了。 还拿着球找跑得远的。。。
不过也要说红皮昨天防的很好，lb压在线前，有时候 all out, 有时候迅速回撤, 把肉
末搞晕了。
不过不管怎样，那时候肉末都应该让人pick up blitz快出手。 既不pick up 也不快出
手，可不是被侮辱被损害的命。。。
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: screen pass 可破all blitz
| d***o
发帖数: 6117 | 5 界就是半吊子阅读和高手的差别。这还不如来个几乎完全没有阅读能力的，比如对面小
马哥，不管你pre snap啥阵势，我就老老实实该干嘛干嘛，一切交给play caller
防守端也是一样，普通cb老老实实跟着跑，文艺cb读qb加预判，二笔cb牛逼哄哄试图阅
读进攻结果被进攻玩
【在 z*i 的大作中提到】
: 所以说肉末被撞蒙了。 还拿着球找跑得远的。。。
: 不过也要说红皮昨天防的很好，lb压在线前，有时候 all out, 有时候迅速回撤, 把肉
: 末搞晕了。
: 不过不管怎样，那时候肉末都应该让人pick up blitz快出手。 既不pick up 也不快出
: 手，可不是被侮辱被损害的命。。。
| c******n
发帖数: 7263 | 6 这也说明区内队更加了解对手，突然这么疯狗一下，肉末就傻了
【在 d***o 的大作中提到】
: 界就是半吊子阅读和高手的差别。这还不如来个几乎完全没有阅读能力的，比如对面小
: 马哥，不管你pre snap啥阵势，我就老老实实该干嘛干嘛，一切交给play caller
: 防守端也是一样，普通cb老老实实跟着跑，文艺cb读qb加预判，二笔cb牛逼哄哄试图阅
: 读进攻结果被进攻玩
|
|
