c******y
发帖数: 256 | 1 There was a second way that Mr. Jastremski and Mr. McNally used the term “
deflation” or “deflator” which the report disregards. The Wells
investigators had the May 9, 2014 “deflator”/espn text string in their
possession several weeks before their full day, four lawyer-staffed
interviews with each of Mr. McNally and Mr. Jastremski. They came to the
interviews with laptops, documentation and had obviously prepared
extensively for each interview. They never asked either of them about that
May 9 “deflator”/espn text. Perhaps that is not surprising since the word
“deflator” appears in only ONE text from among many hundreds of texts that
were made available to the investigators. The Report then takes this one
word, in this one text, and uses it throughout the Report as a moniker for
Mr. McNally. Is this true objectivity? Further, when they sought their
additional interview with Mr. McNally, they never candidly said they had
overlooked this text and therefore wanted Mr. McNally back for another
interview to ask him about it. They never asked Mr. Jastremski about it in
his interview. Had they done so, they would have learned from either
gentleman one of the ways they used the deflation/deflator term. Mr.
Jastremski would sometimes work out and bulk up — he is a slender guy and
his goal was to get to 200 pounds. Mr. McNally is a big fellow and had the
opposite goal: to lose weight. “Deflate” was a term they used to refer to
losing weight. One can specifically see this use of the term in a Nov. 30,
2014 text from Mr. McNally to Mr. Jastremski: “deflate and give somebody
that jacket.” (p. 87). This banter, and Mr. McNally’s goal of losing
weight, meant Mr. McNally was the “deflator.” There was nothing
complicated or sinister about it. If there was any doubt about the jocular
nature of the May 9, 2014 texts, a review of all the texts between these two
men that day would dispel it:
12:21:46: JM “Whats up dorito dink”
12:22:53: JJ “Nada”
12:22:53: JM “Whens the pong party….im on fire”
12:23:10: JJ “Omg”
12:23:34: JM “Bring it”
16:29:48: JM “You still with your women”
16:29:59: JJ “Yup”
16:33:21: JM “You must have her [omitted out of respect to Mrs. Jastremski]”
16:34:39: JM “You must have a picture of her [omitted out of respect to Mrs
. Jastremski]”
16:36:31: JJ “Omg”
16:37:16: JM “You working”
16:37:53 JJ “Yup”
16:39:40 JM “Nice dude…jimmy needs some kicks….lets
make a deal…come on help the deflator”
[After Mr. Jastremski does not respond for several minutes, Mr. McNally
sends a follow-up text.]
16:47:15 JM “Chill buddy im just f****n with you….im not going
to espn….yet”
The “espn” reference in this string of jocular texts was part of their
banter and related to the “new kicks.” Mr. Jastremski had made it clear to
Mr. McNally over time that his (Jastremski’s) boss would not be happy with
him were he to give away sneakers to Mr. McNally. That fact is quite
explicit in a number of their texts. (p. 82 — after texting about possibly
getting Mr. McNally sneakers and apparel, Mr. Jastremski writes: “unless
Dave [his boss, Dave Schoenfeld] leaves the room tomorrow then it’ll wait
till next week”). Getting sneakers or apparel for his friend Mr. McNally,
in short, meant Mr. Jastremski would have to do so behind his boss’s back.
They teased each other about whether Mr. Jastremski would get in trouble for
giving him sneakers. The May 2014 McNally text reference to “not going to
espn” follows his request for “new kicks,” and was Mr. McNally’s way of
saying, in substance: “Hey, don’t worry about whether giving me those
sneakers will get you in trouble — I’ll never tell.” The Wells
investigators had this text long before their interviews with Mr. McNally
and Mr. Jastremski. Had they asked Mr. McNally or Mr. Jastremski about this
text when they interviewed each for a full day using four lawyers, they
would have learned this. |
c******y
发帖数: 256 | 2 Wells 这下子傻了，面谈的时候居然没有问这个问题，然后拿着去做证据。看这上下文
真的是和放气无关啊 |
h*********r
发帖数: 10182 | 3 我早说了，这个wells就是witch hunting,根本没有任何底线的无耻 witch hunting.
鸡蛋里挑骨头，莫须有。
这事绝对没完！ |
d**********9
发帖数: 5215 | 4 看你上窜下跳的不容易,请解释卖国者为什么把这两个人fired了?
【在 h*********r 的大作中提到】
: 我早说了，这个wells就是witch hunting,根本没有任何底线的无耻 witch hunting.
: 鸡蛋里挑骨头，莫须有。
: 这事绝对没完！
|
h*********r
发帖数: 10182 | 5 我为什么要给你解释？
【在 d**********9 的大作中提到】
: 看你上窜下跳的不容易,请解释卖国者为什么把这两个人fired了?
|
d**********9
发帖数: 5215 | 6 呵呵 既然两人那么无辜 反而被fired了。还有看你那么卖力洗地，跟brady很熟吧，捐
款了吗？要不要写一篇长文做他的character reference啊
【在 h*********r 的大作中提到】
: 我为什么要给你解释？
|
h*********r
发帖数: 10182 | 7 这又没在报告了，解释pats一切行为有必要吗？
【在 d**********9 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵 既然两人那么无辜 反而被fired了。还有看你那么卖力洗地，跟brady很熟吧，捐
: 款了吗？要不要写一篇长文做他的character reference啊
|
t******g
发帖数: 10390 | 8 他们被停职可以是因为在短信里insult球队的四分卫球星.被wells批露出来了.
【在 d**********9 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵 既然两人那么无辜 反而被fired了。还有看你那么卖力洗地，跟brady很熟吧，捐
: 款了吗？要不要写一篇长文做他的character reference啊
|
l******u
发帖数: 2401 | 9 要是真想cover up才得把这两个爷供起来呢
【在 d**********9 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵 既然两人那么无辜 反而被fired了。还有看你那么卖力洗地，跟brady很熟吧，捐
: 款了吗？要不要写一篇长文做他的character reference啊
|
h*********r
发帖数: 10182 | 10 这个短信的上下文里有 背着他们的boss，偷拿sneakers的行为。
【在 t******g 的大作中提到】
: 他们被停职可以是因为在短信里insult球队的四分卫球星.被wells批露出来了.
|
J**e
发帖数: 15008 | 11 找球星要球衣一般是不允许的，就这一条足够解雇了。到现在还没实质的证据意味着什
么呢？
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.2
【在 d**********9 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵 既然两人那么无辜 反而被fired了。还有看你那么卖力洗地，跟brady很熟吧，捐
: 款了吗？要不要写一篇长文做他的character reference啊
|
