s*****o 发帖数: 22187 | 1 SNF, Boys vs Bears, 1st quarter 11 mins, 3rd and 6 at Bear's 28, score 0-0
Boys S11, top TE+2WR stack, bottom 1WR, EE is protecting Dak.
Bears dime (or nickel?), 2 high safeties, 3CB (or 2CB+LB) defending stack
WRs, 1CB man the single WR at bottom. At LOS, only two down linemen(?), 3
LBs show blitz.
Snap, only 3 men rush, why? One LB follows EE, another shadows Dak (dual
threat).
Boys 3 WR stack show pick play. Beasley pretends to run an out route and
form a "pick" with Witten's slant or in route. In fact, Beasley runs the in
route. The defender is half a second too late due to the confusion. Beasley
makes a separation and Dak throws the ball at the last second. It's a catch.
However, Beasley failed to gain enough yardage to make the 1st down and took
a really BIG hit...
Discussion:
1. Was it dime or nickel for Bear's D? Is two down linemen normal?
2. Triple threat from EE and Dak drew two defenders. Not the case for Romo.
3. Stack WR formation is good.
4. Hope Beasley will be fine physically and mentally...
https://twitter.com/T_UNIT44/status/780390541787705345
https://youtu.be/KQ6-suVy9B0?t=12 | E*H 发帖数: 1207 | 2 比斯利整个人被撞得飞回来一两码,
没放炮简直是奇迹。
in
Beasley
【在 s*****o 的大作中提到】 : SNF, Boys vs Bears, 1st quarter 11 mins, 3rd and 6 at Bear's 28, score 0-0 : Boys S11, top TE+2WR stack, bottom 1WR, EE is protecting Dak. : Bears dime (or nickel?), 2 high safeties, 3CB (or 2CB+LB) defending stack : WRs, 1CB man the single WR at bottom. At LOS, only two down linemen(?), 3 : LBs show blitz. : Snap, only 3 men rush, why? One LB follows EE, another shadows Dak (dual : threat). : Boys 3 WR stack show pick play. Beasley pretends to run an out route and : form a "pick" with Witten's slant or in route. In fact, Beasley runs the in : route. The defender is half a second too late due to the confusion. Beasley
| z*i 发帖数: 58873 | 3 4WR, this is dime. 这球设计的不错,防守以为beasely会跟着开路的两个wr,结果他
闪进来以后空了。safety上来的够快,beasely小个子这种线路被欺负也没办法。 下次
把他和Witten换换吧
in
Beasley
【在 s*****o 的大作中提到】 : SNF, Boys vs Bears, 1st quarter 11 mins, 3rd and 6 at Bear's 28, score 0-0 : Boys S11, top TE+2WR stack, bottom 1WR, EE is protecting Dak. : Bears dime (or nickel?), 2 high safeties, 3CB (or 2CB+LB) defending stack : WRs, 1CB man the single WR at bottom. At LOS, only two down linemen(?), 3 : LBs show blitz. : Snap, only 3 men rush, why? One LB follows EE, another shadows Dak (dual : threat). : Boys 3 WR stack show pick play. Beasley pretends to run an out route and : form a "pick" with Witten's slant or in route. In fact, Beasley runs the in : route. The defender is half a second too late due to the confusion. Beasley
| s*****o 发帖数: 22187 | 4 这种扔到1st down marker前面一点的球,好几次都是Beasley摆脱一个tackle拿到1st&
10,这次没想到safety得个正着。现在录像多了,都研究透了,以后再这么玩,估计没
两下就废了。。。
【在 z*i 的大作中提到】 : 4WR, this is dime. 这球设计的不错,防守以为beasely会跟着开路的两个wr,结果他 : 闪进来以后空了。safety上来的够快,beasely小个子这种线路被欺负也没办法。 下次 : 把他和Witten换换吧 : : in : Beasley
| z*i 发帖数: 58873 | 5 底下1-1为啥不仍啊
--肉末
1st&
【在 s*****o 的大作中提到】 : 这种扔到1st down marker前面一点的球,好几次都是Beasley摆脱一个tackle拿到1st& : 10,这次没想到safety得个正着。现在录像多了,都研究透了,以后再这么玩,估计没 : 两下就废了。。。
| s*****o 发帖数: 22187 | 6 我看到肉末的一个细节,不知道理解的对不对,没找到高光
大概是第四节领先挺多了,需要磨时间,大概2nd and 8。对方堆满了box,转播给了肉
末一个镜头,看起来好像在点数,我估计是数box。镜头转回给场中,Dak拿球直接交给
EE,结果no gain。镜头再回给肉末,只见肉末微笑的摇了摇头。。。
【在 z*i 的大作中提到】 : 底下1-1为啥不仍啊 : --肉末 : : 1st&
|
|