l*******n
发帖数: 57 | 1 EB1 EA批了，在準備485。我的理解是，EB1 EA屬於self petition,不需要Employment
Letter。各位有經驗的能否澄清一下？ |
A*********r
发帖数: 8271 | 2 In the statutory language of EB1a, the United States congress requires you to show a tentative plan to work in U.S. in the area you claim extraordinary ability. Thus, it would be better to include a letter of employment.
It is by no means absolute necessary since the basic presumption of
employment-based immigration is that you will work in United States upon
getting the green card; however, it definite helps you to show IO your
intention if you can provide letter of employment or future job off |
l*******n
发帖数: 57 | 3 Thank you. Actually I have a job (government agency). But I don't like to
work with the HR here. I guess they may argue on this "...you must submit a
letter on the letterhead of the petitioning employer which confirms that the
job on which the visa petition is based is still available to you..." (
USCIS, Instruction for I-485), since they are not the "petitioning employer"
. |
l******5
发帖数: 3030 | 4 yes, you need. somebody got twice RFE because of the Employment
Verificationm for EB1A |
c******1
发帖数: 73 | 5 Does the employment letter have to specifically specify the "PERMANENT" word?
Thanks!!
【在 l******5 的大作中提到】
: yes, you need. somebody got twice RFE because of the Employment
: Verificationm for EB1A
|
l******5
发帖数: 3030 | 6 no necessary, just regular employment verification
word?
【在 c******1 的大作中提到】
: Does the employment letter have to specifically specify the "PERMANENT" word?
: Thanks!!
|
c***i
发帖数: 34 | 7 我的理解是即使你是self petition，你也一定需要一份employment letter，因为你申
请的是EB（employment-based）。在I-485表格的instructionhttp://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-485instr.pdf的initial evidence中明确列了employment letter（第11条)。 |
A*******d
发帖数: 1799 | 8 答案这么清楚明确。
【在 c***i 的大作中提到】
: 我的理解是即使你是self petition，你也一定需要一份employment letter，因为你申
: 请的是EB（employment-based）。在I-485表格的instructionhttp://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-485instr.pdf的initial evidence中明确列了employment letter（第11条)。
|
