|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c******0
发帖数: 124 | 1 Finally, it must be established that the "significant" benefit derived from
this particular alien's participation in the "national interest " field of
endeavor "considerably" outweighs the "inherent" national interest in
protecting U.S. workers through the labor certification process.
在同行业中﹐申請人有超过同类研究人员的成果和贡献並且要证明如果办理劳工应聘的
程序﹐将对美国家利益有负面的影响。这一点是国家利益豁免的关键所在。许多申请人
往往由于无法证明这一点，而导致最终申请被拒。
以上的问题，搞不明白，申述信中要如何说明才适合要求？ | c******0
发帖数: 124 | | y******y
发帖数: 676 | 3 帮你顶，我也想知道。 在这个版上的人都盯着EB-1A呢。 | t***n
发帖数: 546 | 4 1.Please note that the need for Dr. xxx’s continued participation is not
the result of a labor shortage of U.S. researchers but rather because his
combination of remarkable skills are unique and his contributions are
superior to the majority of his peers.
2.Because a labor certification process is a standardized one that only
relates to minimum requirements of education and experience, such a process
will not take into account these crucial factors. In other words, many of
the essential qualiti | c******0
发帖数: 124 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
