j******n
发帖数: 697 | 1 case被NOID，律师claim published material被否，在准备response的过程和律师意见
相左
大家普遍的意见都是citation不能被作为EB1B的published material的证据。
律师义正言辞的发来信，引了他们以前NOID回复模板的句子抨击IO的判断。如下
我回复NOID的时候是否能回避被否的claim？
请问大家，被文章或者书引用，究竟能不能作为EB1B的published material。如果是大
段的讨论呢？
This substantial citation and discussion alone should satisfy the
requirements of the criterion. 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii) states that this
criterion should be met if evidence is provided of the title, date, author
and any translation, if necessary, of work written about the beneficiary and
his or her research in the field. There is no statutory requirement
requiring that a certain percentage of a given article be written
specifically about the beneficiary or even that the beneficiary be named in
the article. More importantly, in any area of scientific inquiry, or,
indeed, any field where a primary means of academic discourse is the
publication of articles in professional journals, citation is a significant
means of sharing information. Citation is also the preferred method for any
author to recognize researchers on whose work the present research was
built. |
|
