B**********4
发帖数: 12 | 1 本人Biomedical researcher
发文5篇加11篇会议论文
引用很低31独立，41全部
审稿超过40
申请老3样，contribution出了问题。。。引用低是硬伤
这是IO的建议，不知道是不是在可操作范围内
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary's work important
3. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance
4. Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
5. Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
Licensed technology being used by others
Patents currently utilized and shown to be significant to the field
想着这哥们怎么不直接拒了呢。。。
感激任何的建议和评论
谢谢 |
D********a
发帖数: 795 | 2 引用可能略低，估计能挖的已经挖过了，重新组织材料吧，就当是又准备一遍 |
B**********4
发帖数: 12 | 3 谢谢。
引我的基本看过了，都是略略提到而已
引用比较多的那位，本来要帮忙推信，后来一直不理我了。 |
B**********4
发帖数: 12 | 4 本人Biomedical researcher
发文5篇加11篇会议论文
引用很低31独立，41全部
审稿超过40
申请老3样，contribution出了问题。。。引用低是硬伤
这是IO的建议，不知道是不是在可操作范围内
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary's work important
3. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance
4. Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
5. Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
Licensed technology being used by others
Patents currently utilized and shown to be significant to the field
想着这哥们怎么不直接拒了呢。。。
感激任何的建议和评论
谢谢 |
D********a
发帖数: 795 | 5 引用可能略低，估计能挖的已经挖过了，重新组织材料吧，就当是又准备一遍 |
B**********4
发帖数: 12 | 6 谢谢。
引我的基本看过了，都是略略提到而已
引用比较多的那位，本来要帮忙推信，后来一直不理我了。 |
o********8
发帖数: 9 | 7 不知道这位兄弟RFE最后怎么恢复的？有结果了么？
【在 B**********4 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。
: 引我的基本看过了，都是略略提到而已
: 引用比较多的那位，本来要帮忙推信，后来一直不理我了。
|
C********e
发帖数: 492 | 8 除非挖掘引用时候发现情况有重大改变；否则我比较建议增加引用后再申请。
consider
【在 B**********4 的大作中提到】
: 本人Biomedical researcher
: 发文5篇加11篇会议论文
: 引用很低31独立，41全部
: 审稿超过40
: 申请老3样，contribution出了问题。。。引用低是硬伤
: 这是IO的建议，不知道是不是在可操作范围内
: 1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
: contribution to the field
: 2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
: the beneficiary's work important
|
