r********i
发帖数: 5358 | 1 小弟有几篇挂名文章，是比较牛的那种文章，现在需要一作和通讯作者写个东西证明小
弟在文章中的重要性，跪求模版，包子答谢！ | r*******i
发帖数: 185 | | o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 3 July 22, 2015
Dear Adjudicating Officer,
I am writing this letter to describe and emphasize the importance of Dr. xx
’s research contributions in the development of a method in xxx project in
the department of xx, xx university.
Briefly, I am a full Professor of xx in xx area. xx has become a very
important field and can help to xx. My current research is focused on xx.
The main strategies used by me and my group are xx.
Dr. xx was the key scientist in the development of xx method used to xx. The
technological details of this platform was recently published at in
Science/Nature in 2015. While I am the corresponding author of this paper,
Dr. xx’s work was the driving force of the analysis and our success would
not have been possible without Dr. xx’s contributions. The work that Dr. xx
did for this project included designing and establishing experiments
prototols of the platform, optimizing the algorithms, and xxx.
The success of this work can be seen in the many applications of this method
at leading institutions in the United States and other countries. Numerous
researchers have also requested this method including xx (Oxford University,
UK), Dr. xx (Harvard University) and Dr. xx (MIT) among an increasing
number of investigators.
In summary, Dr. xx’s work was essential to this project and his
contributions were vital to its success. Please contact me if you require
further information regarding Dr. xx’s contributions to this project.
Sincerely,
xxx, PhD | o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 4 这是我曾经用过的。请在开头加上推荐人的详细title， 用单位的信纸打印，然后签名。
其实没有什么固定的格式，关键是内容要有力。
Bless！ | l*****1
发帖数: 151 | 5 强调贡献，一作的证明信其实作用很小。最有说服力的是具体讨论自己在这篇paper里
做了什么工作，这个工作对这篇paper的结论起到关键性的贡献，在这个基础上如果有
一作证明当然更好，没有也没事，因为足以说服IO（即使N作）。相反，仅仅只是说些
假大空的话和强调这篇papaer多么牛，即便楼主是前三作，也不是好的论述，没有分量。
以上是我律师当时的建议。我有篇7作的25分的nature子刊就是这样强调的，EB1A直接
加急10天通过。希望能帮到你。 | o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 6 Agree. 如果一作或者联系作者可以出证明信的话，尽量在文中用科普的语言具体的描
述你的重要贡献，避免空洞。
量。
【在 l*****1 的大作中提到】
: 强调贡献，一作的证明信其实作用很小。最有说服力的是具体讨论自己在这篇paper里
: 做了什么工作，这个工作对这篇paper的结论起到关键性的贡献，在这个基础上如果有
: 一作证明当然更好，没有也没事，因为足以说服IO（即使N作）。相反，仅仅只是说些
: 假大空的话和强调这篇papaer多么牛，即便楼主是前三作，也不是好的论述，没有分量。
: 以上是我律师当时的建议。我有篇7作的25分的nature子刊就是这样强调的，EB1A直接
: 加急10天通过。希望能帮到你。
| j******w
发帖数: 933 | 7 这是我引用最高的一篇酱油文章的第一作者写的推荐信。在我的PL里面把这些引用高的
N作文章专门列到contribution里作为一项，结合这封推荐信和文章引用排名作为亮点
。具体可以看我PL的模板在另一个帖子里：http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/33808043.html
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
RE: Dr. Z's Immigrant Petition
To Whom It May Concern:
I am delighted to write this letter in strong support of Dr. Z’s I-140
Immigration Petition for permanent residency in the United States. Dr. Z is
an extraordinary researcher who has made major original contributions to the
field of nanoscience and nanotechnology. We have co-published a paper
titled "XXXX" in the prestigious journal of XXXX in 20XX, and his research
interests align with those of my research group. Therefore, I have the
qualification to make comments on the originality and significance of his
work.
I am currently a professor in the XXXX University. I obtained my doctorate
degree from the University of XXXX, one of the most prestigious universities
in China. My current research focuses on the design and production of novel
nanoparticle contrast agents for medical imaging and clinical applications.
I have published a number of papers in peer-reviewed journals such as
Nanoscale, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Journal of American
Chemical Society, etc.
The work that I co-authored with Dr. Z developed a novel XX system to
synthesize XXXX. (introduction to the project). We successfully synthesized
XX. In the previous years, XXXX. However, the XXXX often have a XXXX, which
greatly limited their optical and sensing properties. For example, Dr. XXXX
’s group in University of XXXX in Germany synthesized XXXX. In our study,
single crystalline nanoparticles were produced with well-controlled sizes on
a large scale, which is significantly beneficial for practical applications.
In this groundbreaking work, Dr. Z made an essential contribution with his
exceptional expertise in characterization of morphological and structural
properties of XXXX, which is an indispensible part of the study. The modern
scientific research requires extensive division and collaboration.
Especially in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology, a high impact
work is typically accomplished by researchers and experts with well-defined
specializations in various fields such as chemistry, physics, biology, or
material science. In order to develop optimal synthetic route for the
production of desired nanomaterials, a comprehensive knowledge must be
established to bridge the synthetic process and sample properties. Therefore
, the testing and characterization of products that are consisting of the
exact percentage of chemicals is one of the most important parts for
contemporary nanoscience research. Dr. Z's extraordinary expertise on sample
characterizations greatly facilitated the accomplishment of this work.
Specifically, as the leading scientist of this project, my contribution was
to design the synthetic route, conduct experiments, collect samples, and
write the manuscript. Dr. Z was in charge of measuring the structural and
compositional properties of our samples and performing data analysis, which
is essential to the success of our project. He provided precise and valuable
feedback to my synthetic processes, so that I was able to optimize the
process by adjusting the experimental parameters such as the temperature,
pressure, concentrations, and pH values, which determined the properties of
final products. Therefore, Dr. Z's contribution to this work is of
significant importance and prerequisite. Our paper has been cited over 170
times across the globe in top peer-reviewed journals such as Chemical
Society Reviews (impact factor 33.383), Journal of American Chemical Society
(impact factor 12.113), Chemistry of Materials (impact factor 8.354), to
name just a few.
To my knowledge, Dr. Z has also collaborated with other researchers during
that time and published a series of seminal scientific research such as "
XXXX" published in Angewandte Chemie International Edition, "XXXX" published
in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, etc. Undoubtedly, Dr. Z has earned an
international reputation with these works, which can be evidenced by a large
number of citations of these papers.
While Dr. Z's extensive collaborations with other scientists have gained him
global recognition in the field of his endeavor, his original scientific
contributions to the field of nanoscience further place him among an elite
group of internationally recognized scientists. He is the first scientist
who demonstrated the Blahblah....
Dr. Z is an internationally renowned scientist and continues to generate
outstanding observations pertinent to nanoscience research. Therefore, I
strongly support his petition for permanent residence in the United States
for continuing his extraordinary research in his field of expertise.
Sincerely yours, | r********n
发帖数: 399 | 8 io大部分时间并不质疑作者顺序。如果大家都这样专门解释，以后说不定io就默认只有
一作才重要了。 | t****2
发帖数: 694 | 9 同意，非常不建议每个人都这么搞, 有点损人不利己.
作者顺序对申绿卡本来不重要，以往几乎没有io质疑这一点。
如果每个人都强调作者顺序，或者找一作写证明信，
时间长了io慢慢就会默认这一点，近来已经有趋势这种质疑变多了。
【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: io大部分时间并不质疑作者顺序。如果大家都这样专门解释，以后说不定io就默认只有
: 一作才重要了。
| j******w
发帖数: 933 | 10 不是我们想强调这个。我被0214毙过一次，除了他标志性的模板回复以外，这厮还专门
说了，我的大部分引用都来自五六七作者的文章，所以不能够说明我contribution的
significance。现在0214的弟子一大堆，大家要对这个做好准备。
【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: io大部分时间并不质疑作者顺序。如果大家都这样专门解释，以后说不定io就默认只有
: 一作才重要了。
| t****2
发帖数: 694 | 11 碰到0214是运气不好，你就是都是一作他一样有理由拒你。
我也遇到过0214，也是说总数没有几千 + 一作太少。
我withdraw后原封不动的材料再交就过了。
【在 j******w 的大作中提到】
: 不是我们想强调这个。我被0214毙过一次，除了他标志性的模板回复以外，这厮还专门
: 说了，我的大部分引用都来自五六七作者的文章，所以不能够说明我contribution的
: significance。现在0214的弟子一大堆，大家要对这个做好准备。
| j******w
发帖数: 933 | 12 以前确实没听说过作者顺序有什么影响，甚至自引他引都没太大区别，但是现在情况不
同了，0214和那帮喽啰们就喜欢挑这个毛病。
【在 t****2 的大作中提到】
: 同意，非常不建议每个人都这么搞, 有点损人不利己.
: 作者顺序对申绿卡本来不重要，以往几乎没有io质疑这一点。
: 如果每个人都强调作者顺序，或者找一作写证明信，
: 时间长了io慢慢就会默认这一点，近来已经有趋势这种质疑变多了。
| r********i
发帖数: 5358 | 13 谢谢，查收包子！
xx
in
The
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: July 22, 2015
: Dear Adjudicating Officer,
: I am writing this letter to describe and emphasize the importance of Dr. xx
: ’s research contributions in the development of a method in xxx project in
: the department of xx, xx university.
: Briefly, I am a full Professor of xx in xx area. xx has become a very
: important field and can help to xx. My current research is focused on xx.
: The main strategies used by me and my group are xx.
: Dr. xx was the key scientist in the development of xx method used to xx. The
: technological details of this platform was recently published at in
| r********i
发帖数: 5358 | 14 谢谢，包子已发！
is
the
【在 j******w 的大作中提到】
: 这是我引用最高的一篇酱油文章的第一作者写的推荐信。在我的PL里面把这些引用高的
: N作文章专门列到contribution里作为一项，结合这封推荐信和文章引用排名作为亮点
: 。具体可以看我PL的模板在另一个帖子里：http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/33808043.html
: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
: RE: Dr. Z's Immigrant Petition
: To Whom It May Concern:
: I am delighted to write this letter in strong support of Dr. Z’s I-140
: Immigration Petition for permanent residency in the United States. Dr. Z is
: an extraordinary researcher who has made major original contributions to the
|
|
