e******u
发帖数: 3206 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: daemonself (mit行为艺术专业博士后导师), 信区: USANews
标 题: 让左x high一晚上，现在开始进入打脸时刻
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 26 08:44:54 2017, 美东)
https://www.uscis.gov/news/fact-sheets/public-charge-fact-sheet
Public Charge Fact Sheet
Released April 29, 2011
Introduction
Public charge has been part of U.S. immigration law for more than 100 years
as a ground of inadmissibility and deportation. An individual who is likely
at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible to the United States
and ineligible to become a legal permanent resident. However, receiving
public benefits does not automatically make an individual a public charge.
This fact sheet provides information about public charge determinations to
help noncitizens make informed choices about whether to apply for certain
public benefits.
Background
Under Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), an
individual seeking admission to the United States or seeking to adjust
status to permanent resident (obtaining a green card) is inadmissible if the
individual "at the time of application for admission or adjustment of
status, is likely at any time to become a public charge." If an individual
is inadmissible, admission to the United States or adjustment of status will
not be granted.
Immigration and welfare laws have generated some concern about whether a
noncitizen may face adverse immigration consequences for having received
federal, state, or local public benefits. Some noncitizens and their
families are eligible for public benefits – including disaster relief,
treatment of communicable diseases, immunizations, and children’s nutrition
and health care programs – without being found to be a public charge.
Definition of Public Charge
In determining inadmissibility, USCIS defines “public charge”as an
individual who is likely to become “primarily dependent on the government
for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash
assistance for income maintenance, or institutionalization for long-term
care at government expense.” See “Field Guidance on Deportability and
Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). In
determining whether an alien meets this definition for public charge
inadmissibility, a number of factors are considered, including age, health,
family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills.
No single factor, other than the lack of an affidavit of support, if
required, will determine whether an individual is a public charge.
Benefits Subject to Public Charge Consideration
USCIS guidance specifies that cash assistance for income maintenance
includes Supplemental Security Income (SSI), cash assistance from the
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program and state or local
cash assistance programs for income maintenance, often called “general
assistance” programs. Acceptance of these forms of public cash assistance
could make a noncitizen inadmissible as a public charge if all other
criteria are met. However, the mere receipt of these benefits does not
automatically make an individual inadmissible, ineligible to adjust status
to lawful permanent resident, or deportable on public charge grounds. See “
Field Guidance on Deportability and Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds
,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). Each determination is made on a case-by-case
basis in the context of the totality of the circumstances.
In addition, public assistance, including Medicaid, that is used to support
aliens who reside in an institution for long-term care – such as a nursing
home or mental health institution – may also be considered as an adverse
factor in the totality of the circumstances for purposes of public charge
determinations. Short-term institutionalization for rehabilitation is not
subject to public charge consideration.
Benefits Not Subject to Public Charge Consideration
Under the agency guidance, non-cash benefits and special-purpose cash
benefits that are not intended for income maintenance are not subject to
public charge consideration. Such benefits include:
Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public
assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of
communicable diseases, use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation
services, prenatal care and emergency medical services) other than support
for long-term institutional care
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
Nutrition programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
(SNAP)- commonly referred to as Food Stamps, the Special Supplemental
Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School
Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency
food assistance programs
Housing benefits
Child care services
Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (
LIHEAP)
Emergency disaster relief
Foster care and adoption assistance
Educational assistance (such as attending public school), including benefits
under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary or higher
education
Job training programs
In-kind, community-based programs, services or assistance (such as soup
kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
Non-cash benefits under TANF such as subsidized child care or transit
subsidies
Cash payments that have been earned, such as Title II Social Security
benefits, government pensions, and veterans' benefits, and other forms of
earned benefits
Unemployment compensation
Some of the above programs may provide cash benefits, such as energy
assistance, transportation or child care benefits provided under TANF or the
Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG), and one-time emergency payments
under TANF. Since the purpose of such benefits is not for income
maintenance, but rather to avoid the need for ongoing cash assistance for
income maintenance, they are not subject to public charge consideration.
Note: In general, lawful permanent residents who currently possess a "green
card" cannot be denied U.S. citizenship for lawfully receiving any public
benefits for which they are eligible. | e******u
发帖数: 3206 | 2 博导用奥巴马时代的司法解释来说明川普的新政策，高明。前朝的剑也能使用？
川普总统令说了，他要rescind and replace关于这个public charge的解释to include
any means of benefits
years
likely
【在 e******u 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
: 发信人: daemonself (mit行为艺术专业博士后导师), 信区: USANews
: 标 题: 让左x high一晚上，现在开始进入打脸时刻
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 26 08:44:54 2017, 美东)
: https://www.uscis.gov/news/fact-sheets/public-charge-fact-sheet
: Public Charge Fact Sheet
: Released April 29, 2011
: Introduction
: Public charge has been part of U.S. immigration law for more than 100 years
: as a ground of inadmissibility and deportation. An individual who is likely
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 3 你是不识字还是回帖不看贴，这里面那条法律是大统领的eo？
include
【在 e******u 的大作中提到】
: 博导用奥巴马时代的司法解释来说明川普的新政策，高明。前朝的剑也能使用？
: 川普总统令说了，他要rescind and replace关于这个public charge的解释to include
: any means of benefits
:
: years
: likely
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 4 In determining inadmissibility, USCIS defines “public charge”as an
individual who is likely to become “primarily dependent on the government
for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash
assistance for income maintenance, or institutionalization for long-term
care at government expense.” See “Field Guidance on Deportability and
Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). In
determining whether an alien meets this definition for public charge
inadmissibility, a number of factors are considered, including age, health,
family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills.
No single factor, other than the lack of an affidavit of support, if
required, will determine whether an individual is a public charge.
1999年是obama时代么?
include
【在 e******u 的大作中提到】
: 博导用奥巴马时代的司法解释来说明川普的新政策，高明。前朝的剑也能使用？
: 川普总统令说了，他要rescind and replace关于这个public charge的解释to include
: any means of benefits
:
: years
: likely
| e******u
发帖数: 3206 | 5 这解释是很久了，不论哪个党上来都认可，巴马也完全承认所以放在网上。可惜你家床
王的狗头军师bannon看不过去，觉得你合法移民也不能吃福利 ，要全部推到重来。
,
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: In determining inadmissibility, USCIS defines “public charge”as an
: individual who is likely to become “primarily dependent on the government
: for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash
: assistance for income maintenance, or institutionalization for long-term
: care at government expense.” See “Field Guidance on Deportability and
: Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). In
: determining whether an alien meets this definition for public charge
: inadmissibility, a number of factors are considered, including age, health,
: family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills.
: No single factor, other than the lack of an affidavit of support, if
| y****i
发帖数: 12114 | | d********f
发帖数: 8289 | 7 说的好
【在 y****i 的大作中提到】
: 术版不谈政治，要谈去军版或者美新。
| r****z
发帖数: 12020 | 8 1999 不是克林顿时代吗？用克林顿证明川普，有意思。
,
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: In determining inadmissibility, USCIS defines “public charge”as an
: individual who is likely to become “primarily dependent on the government
: for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash
: assistance for income maintenance, or institutionalization for long-term
: care at government expense.” See “Field Guidance on Deportability and
: Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). In
: determining whether an alien meets this definition for public charge
: inadmissibility, a number of factors are considered, including age, health,
: family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills.
: No single factor, other than the lack of an affidavit of support, if
| r****z
发帖数: 12020 | 9 难啊，主要是左右两派都以为对方是最大 Joke
【在 y****i 的大作中提到】
: 术版不谈政治，要谈去军版或者美新。
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 10 着什么叫解释了很久了？这个是移民局根据ina，which is美国最新的移民法作出的
guideline，没有任何人可以歪曲，及时任何eo否定其中的任何内容也都是不可追溯，
这是最基本的美国法律常识。你们这些左x每天躲在唐人街地下室里发明出一大堆美国
法律法规，国会给你们发工资么
【在 e******u 的大作中提到】
: 这解释是很久了，不论哪个党上来都认可，巴马也完全承认所以放在网上。可惜你家床
: 王的狗头军师bannon看不过去，觉得你合法移民也不能吃福利 ，要全部推到重来。
:
: ,
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 11 托姐。我又给你普法了，请赶快从象牙塔的梦境里醒来吧
【在 r****z 的大作中提到】
: 1999 不是克林顿时代吗？用克林顿证明川普，有意思。
:
: ,
| r****z
发帖数: 12020 | 12 我正在接受你洗脑呐，就是觉得用声明一用的是克林顿时代的文件而不是Obama时代文
件来证明川普英明神武挺有喜感的，嘻嘻。
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 托姐。我又给你普法了，请赶快从象牙塔的梦境里醒来吧
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 13 请你批判
着什么叫解释了很久了？这个是移民局根据ina，which is美国最新的移民法作出的
guideline，没有任何人可以歪曲，及时任何eo否定其中的任何内容也都是不可追溯，
这是最基本的美国法律常识。你们这些左x每天躲在唐人街地下室里发明出一大堆美国
法律法规，国会给你们发工资么
【在 r****z 的大作中提到】
: 我正在接受你洗脑呐，就是觉得用声明一用的是克林顿时代的文件而不是Obama时代文
: 件来证明川普英明神武挺有喜感的，嘻嘻。
| r****z
发帖数: 12020 | 14 没打算批判呀，我这不是正在学习嘛。这不是 Trump 签的，你的意思是 Trump 如果想
改是不可能的？他要发总统令改也不行，这摊总统说不上话？
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 请你批判
: 着什么叫解释了很久了？这个是移民局根据ina，which is美国最新的移民法作出的
: guideline，没有任何人可以歪曲，及时任何eo否定其中的任何内容也都是不可追溯，
: 这是最基本的美国法律常识。你们这些左x每天躲在唐人街地下室里发明出一大堆美国
: 法律法规，国会给你们发工资么
|
|
