p**p
发帖数: 10318 | 1 感谢那么多人给我出谋划策，提供各种数据和治疗， 就不一一感谢了！！！
我想了下， 如果双方各自的论据不同，又互不不信任的话，上来提供这些资料意义不
大，都不一定看， 所以我强调了一部分数据后，更多的是强调， 兼听则明， 这个观
点对一个学者来说是很容易接受的。贴过来，大家指出，多提意见， 晚上就发了。英
文大不如从前，语法什么有误，也一并给我指出。
鄙人回信如下：
Mr.XXXX,
Thanks for the reply.
"How have they been treated by Chinese colonialists for over fifty years?", that is really a good question, and the answer completely depends upon whom you are asking, the monasteries, nobles and governing officials Tibetans who once occupied only 5 percent Tibetan populations yet own | c****t
发帖数: 1262 | 2 上面有人提到西方人写的关于 1950s前的西藏
我没有去查来看，也许可以做reference
http://www.swans.com/library/art9/mparen01.html#19
引用了
19。Gelder and Gelder, The Timely Rain, 113. (back)
20. A. Tom Grunfeld, The Making of Modern Tibet rev. ed. (Armonk, N.Y. and
London: 1996), 9 and 7-33 for a general discussion of feudal Tibet; see also
Felix Greene, A Curtain of Ignorance (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1961),
241-249; Goldstein, A History of Modern Tibet 1913-1951, 3-5; and Lopez,
Prisoners of Shangri-La, passim. (back)
21.
【在 p**p 的大作中提到】
: 感谢那么多人给我出谋划策，提供各种数据和治疗， 就不一一感谢了！！！
: 我想了下， 如果双方各自的论据不同，又互不不信任的话，上来提供这些资料意义不
: 大，都不一定看， 所以我强调了一部分数据后，更多的是强调， 兼听则明， 这个观
: 点对一个学者来说是很容易接受的。贴过来，大家指出，多提意见， 晚上就发了。英
: 文大不如从前，语法什么有误，也一并给我指出。
: 鄙人回信如下：
: Mr.XXXX,
: Thanks for the reply.
: "How have they been treated by Chinese colonialists for over fifty years?", that is really a good question, and the answer completely depends upon whom you are asking, the monasteries, nobles and governing officials Tibetans who once occupied only 5 percent Tibetan populations yet own
|
|
