s********n
发帖数: 26222 | 1 Dear Shi-min Fang,
Thank you for admitting your error in failing to cite my article in your
initial online essay, and for the apology regarding it. I do not, however,
believe that your response adequately addresses the points I made in my open
letter. The issue is not a matter of a missing citation, which, since you
have corrected it, would be a minor matter indeed. The issue is that you
have appropriated my entire argument and most of the examples that I use to
support it. Whether we want to label this "plagiarism" or "copyright
infringement" or some combination of the two is irrelevant. The fact is that
you did not alter my argument in any way; you did not mix it or modify it
with other peoples's arguments; and you presented it in exactly the same
order and (and here I must insist on this) using the same language. Now you
add the additional insult in arguing that I am mis-using the concepts of
plagiarism and copyright infringement in making my accusations. And you do
so without justifying this attack upon my supposed ignorance. So how,
exactly, do you define plagiarism and copyright infringement? At what point
did you inquire of me or of Oxford University Press the right to use a large
portion of my article, or even to popularize it?
Please note that I am sending this to all of the people who have expressed
interest in this issue. As I said in my open letter to you, I want to use
this as an educational forum. Your attempt to prevent those who you consider
your "enemies" from having a voice in this discussion undermines the
openness with which I approached you and is counter-productive.
Sincerely,
Bob Root-Bernstein | m*****e
发帖数: 10963 | | s********n
发帖数: 26222 | 3 是， 这事发生在方舟子身上就不算事， 发生在别人身上就是大事。 方舟子就是典型
的双重标准， 只许打别人假， 不许别人打他的假。
瞧这jb如何善终
【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
: 鸡巴，，多大点事啊，，
: 那鸡毛当零件。。
| m*****e
发帖数: 10963 | 4 鸡巴双重标准。。。
方舟子打假打的大快人心，没冤打一个，打的都是一群鸡巴罪有应得的傻逼。
支持。
这些鸡巴用一些可有可无的小草小写来抹黑方舟子的傻逼，再努力也没鸡巴用。一毛钱
也不能美白那些被方舟子痛打的傻逼。。。一点机会也没有。。 | s********n
发帖数: 26222 | 5 方舟子做了下列事情：
1， 打假
2， 剽窃他人著作多次
3， 一搞多投多次， 国内投稿至少8稿投22次， 骗取稿酬
4， 收受转基因粮食利益集团收买， 多次鼓吹转基因粮食无害论， 其代表作《我为什
么选择转基因》
功归功， 过归过， 打他没商量
【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
: 鸡巴双重标准。。。
: 方舟子打假打的大快人心，没冤打一个，打的都是一群鸡巴罪有应得的傻逼。
: 支持。
: 这些鸡巴用一些可有可无的小草小写来抹黑方舟子的傻逼，再努力也没鸡巴用。一毛钱
: 也不能美白那些被方舟子痛打的傻逼。。。一点机会也没有。。
|
|
