s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 1 我的Droid，12.2秒，贴图，顺便跟一个图对比。 |
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | |
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 3 偶得14.8 N1
Droid performance不错嘛
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 我的Droid，12.2秒，贴图，顺便跟一个图对比。
|
s****c
发帖数: 11300 | 4 我台式机是532ms啊
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 网址在这里。
: 另外，我的台式机Chrome 结果是 676.4毫秒。
: http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 5 笔记本1613ms, t61/firefox
【在 s****c 的大作中提到】
: 我台式机是532ms啊
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 6 my N1 on 3G:
14262.8 ms
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: 偶得14.8 N1
: Droid performance不错嘛
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 7 toshiba t4200 cpu laptop/firefox 1649ms
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: 笔记本1613ms, t61/firefox
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 8 靠,偶要把这个t61扔了
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: toshiba t4200 cpu laptop/firefox 1649ms
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 9 我写错了。t4200 cpu的toshiba L305-S5945..
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: 靠,偶要把这个t61扔了
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 10 t61 chrome 715.8ms
貌似chrome针对js优化很强哦
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: toshiba t4200 cpu laptop/firefox 1649ms
|
|
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 11 t4200 cpu的toshiba chrome, 666ms.
看来chrome比ff快了一倍以上啊。以后要多用chrome
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: 我写错了。t4200 cpu的toshiba L305-S5945..
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 12 用惯了ff了,改不过去了
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: t4200 cpu的toshiba chrome, 666ms.
: 看来chrome比ff快了一倍以上啊。以后要多用chrome
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 13 是啊。FF有很多extension, chrome还是很少用
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: 用惯了ff了,改不过去了
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 14 这个是超频了的结果。不超频的话，我再测一个一会儿。应该不如N1好。
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: 偶得14.8 N1
: Droid performance不错嘛
|
e***y
发帖数: 4472 | 15 台机chrome 379.6ms
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 网址在这里。
: 另外，我的台式机Chrome 结果是 676.4毫秒。
: http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 16 超频也就1G吧? N1 default 1G啊
这个比较才客观点
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 这个是超频了的结果。不超频的话，我再测一个一会儿。应该不如N1好。
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 17 wow. so fast! what cpu?
【在 e***y 的大作中提到】
: 台机chrome 379.6ms
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 18 终于回到厂家设置啦。22.3秒。差不少啊。
Droid, 2月10号要OTA. 过了那时候还得超啊。
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: 超频也就1G吧? N1 default 1G啊
: 这个比较才客观点
|
s********e
发帖数: 158 | |
y****d
发帖数: 396 | 20 Desktop
chrome: 430.2ms
firefox 3.6: 858.4ms
ie8: 4868.4ms
ie8 lose; chrome win！ |
|
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 21 ie8太让人跌眼镜了,虽然chrome必胜
【在 y****d 的大作中提到】
: Desktop
: chrome: 430.2ms
: firefox 3.6: 858.4ms
: ie8: 4868.4ms
: ie8 lose; chrome win！
|
e***y
发帖数: 4472 | 22 q93而已, 不知i7能多少
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: wow. so fast! what cpu?
|
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 23 你这droid超频了测出来的结果吧
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 我的Droid，12.2秒，贴图，顺便跟一个图对比。
|
t******e
发帖数: 2009 | |
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 25 Safari on MBP
493.2ms +/- 0.8% hehe
【在 s****c 的大作中提到】
: 我台式机是532ms啊
|
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 26 Second run, after closing all other Safari windows and tabs:
421.8ms +/- 0.6%
And the last reboot of my MBP was 2 weeks ago. hehe
【在 L********e 的大作中提到】
: Safari on MBP
: 493.2ms +/- 0.8% hehe
|
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 27
【在 L********e 的大作中提到】
: Second run, after closing all other Safari windows and tabs:
: 421.8ms +/- 0.6%
: And the last reboot of my MBP was 2 weeks ago. hehe
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 28 是。我前面提到了。不超：22。4秒
【在 Z****e 的大作中提到】
: 你这droid超频了测出来的结果吧
|
t*n
发帖数: 14458 | 29 俺的firefox 3.0.5 3226.8ms
//ft
Desktop
chrome: 430.2ms
firefox 3.6: 858.4ms
ie8: 4868.4ms
ie8 lose; chrome win！
【在 y****d 的大作中提到】
: Desktop
: chrome: 430.2ms
: firefox 3.6: 858.4ms
: ie8: 4868.4ms
: ie8 lose; chrome win！
|
w******3
发帖数: 1662 | |
|
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 31 Chrome: 473.8
Safari: 485.4
Firefox:886
IE: why bother?
All newest version. |
s**********x
发帖数: 4593 | 32 IBM t43
1094.0ms +/- 17.8% |
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 33 看来safari很牛啊。和chrome相当。我觉得chrome快是因为他是个stripped down ligh
t weight browser. 想不到safari比FF还快了近一倍
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: Chrome: 473.8
: Safari: 485.4
: Firefox:886
: IE: why bother?
: All newest version.
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 34 Safari and Chrome are brothers. Same webkit engine. JavaScript engines are
different. Clearly Apple and
Google are on top of the game interms of JavaScript performance.
IPhone 3gs' performance is quite impressive considering it is half year
older than nexus. Droid did fine tor
its first true smartphone of Motor.
ligh
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: 看来safari很牛啊。和chrome相当。我觉得chrome快是因为他是个stripped down ligh
: t weight browser. 想不到safari比FF还快了近一倍
|
a******e
发帖数: 36306 | 35 这个droid超频了不会disable warranty巴？
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 是。我前面提到了。不超：22。4秒
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 36 我又返回了。等OTA到2.1后再超。800M super stable。电子产品还没等warranty过就
自己过气
啦。
【在 a******e 的大作中提到】
: 这个droid超频了不会disable warranty巴？
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 37 啥机器啊？
【在 t*n 的大作中提到】
: 俺的firefox 3.0.5 3226.8ms
: //ft
:
: Desktop
: chrome: 430.2ms
: firefox 3.6: 858.4ms
: ie8: 4868.4ms
: ie8 lose; chrome win！
|
s******a
发帖数: 517 | 38 Desktop with Firefox3.6 1291.6ms
Same desktop with IE6 38526.6ms |
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 39 sunspider主要测JS性能，Safari现在用SquirrelFish Extreme引擎，跟Chrome的V8性
能差不多
ligh
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: 看来safari很牛啊。和chrome相当。我觉得chrome快是因为他是个stripped down ligh
: t weight browser. 想不到safari比FF还快了近一倍
|
t*n
发帖数: 14458 | 40 c2d t7250
2GB RAM
是不是开的其他网页多了也有影响
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 啥机器啊？
|
|
|
p****t
发帖数: 11416 | 41 我的desktop，IE8 5240ms，FF 1.5 1870ms……
这东西鬼知道怎么写的程序，IE8上面CPU根本没有Load，FF 1.5看到
只有一个Core full load，其它依然闲着
【在 Z****e 的大作中提到】
: sunspider主要测JS性能，Safari现在用SquirrelFish Extreme引擎，跟Chrome的V8性
: 能差不多
:
: ligh
|
i***d
发帖数: 1077 | 42 TP2 225s!
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 我的Droid，12.2秒，贴图，顺便跟一个图对比。
|
g***u
发帖数: 5413 | 43 我现在用的台式机的IE8 9801.8ms，4个核倒是都差不多，不过才刚过10%
【在 p****t 的大作中提到】
: 我的desktop，IE8 5240ms，FF 1.5 1870ms……
: 这东西鬼知道怎么写的程序，IE8上面CPU根本没有Load，FF 1.5看到
: 只有一个Core full load，其它依然闲着
|
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 44 Two observations:
1 sui's bench results were prb from a Windows machine. The comparison was
not a good one. Not fair for Chrome
because it was run on an inferior Operating System. Not fair for Safari
because Safari was designed to best run on a
Mac. There is only so much you can do with Windows. Neither browser can
demo its full potential.
2 It seems the Chrome scores ppl get on a Windows desktop is about the same
I got from a Mac laptop using Safari.
All other browsers are 2-10 times slo
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: 看来safari很牛啊。和chrome相当。我觉得chrome快是因为他是个stripped down ligh
: t weight browser. 想不到safari比FF还快了近一倍
|
s*****n
发帖数: 2174 | 45 Desktop (奔4, 双核3.4G, 3G RAM, Windows XP Professional):
Firefox 3.6: 1584.4ms
Chrome 4.0: 939.6ms
IE 6.0: 53356.2ms (版本太旧了, 大家见笑)
Laptop (MacBook Pro, 双核2.26G, 4G RAM, Mac OS X 10.5.8)
Firefox 3.5.7: 1295.2 ms
Chrome 4.0: 542.6 ms
Safari 4.0: 582.2 ms
Droid:
Dolphin Browser: 39838.2ms
Built-in Browser: 36498.0ms |
N*C
发帖数: 1987 | 46 我的139s。malrom.
【在 i***d 的大作中提到】
: TP2 225s!
|
l*****e
发帖数: 16384 | 47 Pentium 双核，1.5G内存
IE8内核，用Maxthon2测的，9978.0ms +/- 2.0%
Chrome 986.8ms +/- 9.3%
FF 1686.6ms +/- 5.6%
Sprint Htc hero: 太慢，不爱等了 |
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 48 Now this test is more interesting. :)
The same version of Chrome is 42% faster on a Mac laptop than on a PC
desktop, even the PC has a faster
CPU. Safari is slightly slower than Chrome on Mac, but the difference is
small. I got a better Safari bench
than you because my MBP has a 2.66G CPU and running Snow Leopard.
So the conclusion seems to be that if you are using a PC, Chrome is your
best choice if speed is your major
concern. However the speed gain by choosing a faster browser is not as
【在 s*****n 的大作中提到】
: Desktop (奔4, 双核3.4G, 3G RAM, Windows XP Professional):
: Firefox 3.6: 1584.4ms
: Chrome 4.0: 939.6ms
: IE 6.0: 53356.2ms (版本太旧了, 大家见笑)
: Laptop (MacBook Pro, 双核2.26G, 4G RAM, Mac OS X 10.5.8)
: Firefox 3.5.7: 1295.2 ms
: Chrome 4.0: 542.6 ms
: Safari 4.0: 582.2 ms
: Droid:
: Dolphin Browser: 39838.2ms
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 49 OK. Just downloaded Dolphin.
Three browsers: stock (builtin), Dophin, and xScope:
【在 s*****n 的大作中提到】
: Desktop (奔4, 双核3.4G, 3G RAM, Windows XP Professional):
: Firefox 3.6: 1584.4ms
: Chrome 4.0: 939.6ms
: IE 6.0: 53356.2ms (版本太旧了, 大家见笑)
: Laptop (MacBook Pro, 双核2.26G, 4G RAM, Mac OS X 10.5.8)
: Firefox 3.5.7: 1295.2 ms
: Chrome 4.0: 542.6 ms
: Safari 4.0: 582.2 ms
: Droid:
: Dolphin Browser: 39838.2ms
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 50 This is actually very much related to the clock rate. Take xScope's
performance for example:
Normal clock 550M: -> score: 22.9
Over clocked:1000M --> score: 12.2
1000/550 = 1.81
22.9/12.2 = 1.87. |
|
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 51 ff+chrome is good enough for PC users
safari sometimes has problem with Flash, I still install ff since it has
many good add-ons.
seldom use chrome, since JS speed is not critical for most users like me.
IE is dead, no matter what
【在 L********e 的大作中提到】
: Now this test is more interesting. :)
: The same version of Chrome is 42% faster on a Mac laptop than on a PC
: desktop, even the PC has a faster
: CPU. Safari is slightly slower than Chrome on Mac, but the difference is
: small. I got a better Safari bench
: than you because my MBP has a 2.66G CPU and running Snow Leopard.
: So the conclusion seems to be that if you are using a PC, Chrome is your
: best choice if speed is your major
: concern. However the speed gain by choosing a faster browser is not as
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 52 sure
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: This is actually very much related to the clock rate. Take xScope's
: performance for example:
: Normal clock 550M: -> score: 22.9
: Over clocked:1000M --> score: 12.2
: 1000/550 = 1.81
: 22.9/12.2 = 1.87.
|
b********p
发帖数: 875 | 53 firefox: 945.4ms
Safari: 365.8ms |
S****M
发帖数: 2198 | 54 台式机FF 3.6：885.4ms +/- 2.6% |
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 55 Sure I understand ppl are used to certain browsers and old habit trumps all.
But we have seen firefox consistently underperform when compared
with Safari and Chrome, often by 200%-300%.
My take is that free and open source software, contrary to popular opinions,
often produces crappy software.
The best softwares are written by elite, professional companies. Firefox is
the second worst performing
browser of all the browsers tested above, across all platforms, only
underperformed by IE. Micros
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: ff+chrome is good enough for PC users
: safari sometimes has problem with Flash, I still install ff since it has
: many good add-ons.
: seldom use chrome, since JS speed is not critical for most users like me.
: IE is dead, no matter what
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 56 Nothing can be implied for what you have listed.
IE: non-open source, worst of all.
all.
opinions,
Firefox is
【在 L********e 的大作中提到】
: Sure I understand ppl are used to certain browsers and old habit trumps all.
: But we have seen firefox consistently underperform when compared
: with Safari and Chrome, often by 200%-300%.
: My take is that free and open source software, contrary to popular opinions,
: often produces crappy software.
: The best softwares are written by elite, professional companies. Firefox is
: the second worst performing
: browser of all the browsers tested above, across all platforms, only
: underperformed by IE. Micros
|
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 57 I just said, Microsoft is an exception.
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: Nothing can be implied for what you have listed.
: IE: non-open source, worst of all.
:
: all.
: opinions,
: Firefox is
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 58 其它也不对啊。Webkit，Safari和Chrome的Engine，就是open source的。
【在 L********e 的大作中提到】
: I just said, Microsoft is an exception.
|
L********e
发帖数: 90 | 59 That's just my take, you can disagree. But as for Webkit, it is hard to
say whether Webkit contributes more
to Apple, or Apple contributes more to Webkit, and now of course google.
Same thing with Linux. Linux as a open source OS, its distributions are
chaotic, its usability is terrible.
Chrome builds on Linux, and I bet given some time, Chrome will be a much
more popular OS than Linux.
Same thing as Mach/FreeBSD and OSX.
Free software are free therefore anarchic. They morph anyway th
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 其它也不对啊。Webkit，Safari和Chrome的Engine，就是open source的。
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 60 above test is just for Javascript, not overall performance
Safari&Chrome are better at JS, not means better at extendability
ff still has big advantage on add ons, and Chrome may follow, Safari is
doomed for this
all.
opinions,
is
【在 L********e 的大作中提到】
: Sure I understand ppl are used to certain browsers and old habit trumps all.
: But we have seen firefox consistently underperform when compared
: with Safari and Chrome, often by 200%-300%.
: My take is that free and open source software, contrary to popular opinions,
: often produces crappy software.
: The best softwares are written by elite, professional companies. Firefox is
: the second worst performing
: browser of all the browsers tested above, across all platforms, only
: underperformed by IE. Micros
|
|
|
f*****Q
发帖数: 1912 | |
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 62 MBP 2.53Ghz C2D
latest webkit/safari
402ms +/- 4.1%
iPhone 3GS 17110 +/- 3%
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: 我的Droid，12.2秒，贴图，顺便跟一个图对比。
|
b*******g
发帖数: 418 | 63 Total: 311.4ms +/- 1.6% |
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 64 all of them are using WebView, so there should not be big difference in
performance
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: OK. Just downloaded Dolphin.
: Three browsers: stock (builtin), Dophin, and xScope:
|
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 65 there's also V8 benchmark, but it runs too long on Android browser and the
Javascript will get killed
【在 f*****Q 的大作中提到】
: 再给你们两个别的测试
: http://dromaeo.com/
: http://jsastar.tapirpirates.net/dfdemo/JSAStarBenchmark.html
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 66 OTA后,第一件事就是删了dolphin
【在 Z****e 的大作中提到】
: all of them are using WebView, so there should not be big difference in
: performance
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 67 That's what I THOUGHT too.
I didn't test with stock and dolphin browsers. Only after Sunwukong said
his testing scores on them are much worse than xScope, I decided to give
all three a fair test. Result is pretty consistent.
Any one here with a Droid, please download xScope and tell us your score.
【在 Z****e 的大作中提到】
: all of them are using WebView, so there should not be big difference in
: performance
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 68 you are fooled for sure, that is AD, man
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: That's what I THOUGHT too.
: I didn't test with stock and dolphin browsers. Only after Sunwukong said
: his testing scores on them are much worse than xScope, I decided to give
: all three a fair test. Result is pretty consistent.
: Any one here with a Droid, please download xScope and tell us your score.
|
s*i
发帖数: 5025 | 69 Faint! What AD?
I AM the author of xScope app and it is the #3 top paid in Communication
category. I simply think it is a good idea that a third party can confirm
what I have tested.
【在 l**t 的大作中提到】
: you are fooled for sure, that is AD, man
|
l**t
发帖数: 10440 | 70 this is interesting,hehe
【在 s*i 的大作中提到】
: Faint! What AD?
: I AM the author of xScope app and it is the #3 top paid in Communication
: category. I simply think it is a good idea that a third party can confirm
: what I have tested.
|
