t*******e
发帖数: 53 | 1 played 10 matches so far...50% win ratio in 3.5 matches..and 100% win in 3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
. |
S***e
发帖数: 4426 | 2 that should be 3.5, definitely.
3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: played 10 matches so far...50% win ratio in 3.5 matches..and 100% win in 3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
: .
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 3 Should be fairly close.
3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: played 10 matches so far...50% win ratio in 3.5 matches..and 100% win in 3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
: .
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 4 No, 3.5 means you can win at least 70% matches in USTA 3.5 league.
【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: that should be 3.5, definitely.
:
: 3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
|
S***e
发帖数: 4426 | 5 interesting. then there's a math problem: how much percentage of 3.5
league players are actually 3.5?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: No, 3.5 means you can win at least 70% matches in USTA 3.5 league.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 6 Your dynamic rating should be between 3.0 and 3.5. The exact number depends
on the competitiveness of the matches you played and the rating of your
opponent. It is not necessary to be 3.25.
3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: played 10 matches so far...50% win ratio in 3.5 matches..and 100% win in 3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
: .
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 7 At most 30% in mathematical sense.
The rule is: if you are NTRP 3.5, you can play anywhere 3.5 or
above, but cannot play 3.0 or below.
However, 3.25 is just about 3.5 in reality, not too much different
in techniques. So you may say most people in 3.5 league are roughly
3.5 or slightly below, and they are definitely above 3.0.
【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: interesting. then there's a math problem: how much percentage of 3.5
: league players are actually 3.5?
|
t*******e
发帖数: 53 | 8 I see. I think 3.0 rating including everyone from 3.0~3.49...and 3.5
includes 3.5~3.99 players...so i am self-rated 3.0 is correct...
depends
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Your dynamic rating should be between 3.0 and 3.5. The exact number depends
: on the competitiveness of the matches you played and the rating of your
: opponent. It is not necessary to be 3.25.
:
: 3.0 matches...so i am 3.25?..
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 9 I believe the average rating of a 3.0 league should be slightly
below 3.0. Same to 3.5.
Your self rating is correct though. But likely you will be bumped
up by the computer next season.
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: I see. I think 3.0 rating including everyone from 3.0~3.49...and 3.5
: includes 3.5~3.99 players...so i am self-rated 3.0 is correct...
:
: depends
|
S***e
发帖数: 4426 | 10 agree, though that sounds more like a 3.5 to me.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: At most 30% in mathematical sense.
: The rule is: if you are NTRP 3.5, you can play anywhere 3.5 or
: above, but cannot play 3.0 or below.
: However, 3.25 is just about 3.5 in reality, not too much different
: in techniques. So you may say most people in 3.5 league are roughly
: 3.5 or slightly below, and they are definitely above 3.0.
|
|
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 11 3.0: 2.51 ~ 3.0
3.5: 3.01 ~ 3.5
4.0: 3.51 ~ 4.0
...
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: I see. I think 3.0 rating including everyone from 3.0~3.49...and 3.5
: includes 3.5~3.99 players...so i am self-rated 3.0 is correct...
:
: depends
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 12 Where are the sandbaggers?
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 3.0: 2.51 ~ 3.0
: 3.5: 3.01 ~ 3.5
: 4.0: 3.51 ~ 4.0
: ...
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 13 Where does this 70% come from? 又是你这个工科男拍脑袋想出来的?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: No, 3.5 means you can win at least 70% matches in USTA 3.5 league.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 14 CC说的。
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Where does this 70% come from? 又是你这个工科男拍脑袋想出来的?
|
t*******e
发帖数: 53 | 15 Found this on USTA site:
Here is an example that applies to all skill levels:
Not all 3.5s are equal.
A 3.5 rating is any rating from 3.01 to 3.50. One 3.5 player may be a 3.49,
about to move into 4.0 territory, another may have just come up from the 3.0
level and is a 3.01.
This also means that if a 3.5 player wins all his matches, he is not
necessarily a 4.0. That 3.49 will probably beat a 3.01 and that does not
make him a 4.0. He should beat weaker players. If he consistently beats
other 3.49 |
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 16 正好这两天刚刚研究了一下NTRP dynamic rating.发现用胜率来衡量很不靠谱呀~~
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: CC说的。
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 17 Wow, in that sense even I will be rated 3.5 if I attend USTA? @_@
,
.0
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: Found this on USTA site:
: Here is an example that applies to all skill levels:
: Not all 3.5s are equal.
: A 3.5 rating is any rating from 3.01 to 3.50. One 3.5 player may be a 3.49,
: about to move into 4.0 territory, another may have just come up from the 3.0
: level and is a 3.01.
: This also means that if a 3.5 player wins all his matches, he is not
: necessarily a 4.0. That 3.49 will probably beat a 3.01 and that does not
: make him a 4.0. He should beat weaker players. If he consistently beats
: other 3.49
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 18 What's your ratio now? Still 100%?
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 正好这两天刚刚研究了一下NTRP dynamic rating.发现用胜率来衡量很不靠谱呀~~
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 19 Yes.
Here are more about how the rating is calculated:
- Ratings are directly affected by: 1) Your partner; 2) Your opponent's
dynamic rating; 3) Your current dynamic rating; 4) The closeness of the
match (regardless of whether it was a win or a loss).
- Ratings are not directly affected by: 1) What position you play; 2) Your
wins and losses; 3) Team standings; 4) Age
Remember win or loss doesn't matter. It is about the competitiveness. So if
you really want to move up:
- Destroy the weaker or c
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: Found this on USTA site:
: Here is an example that applies to all skill levels:
: Not all 3.5s are equal.
: A 3.5 rating is any rating from 3.01 to 3.50. One 3.5 player may be a 3.49,
: about to move into 4.0 territory, another may have just come up from the 3.0
: level and is a 3.01.
: This also means that if a 3.5 player wins all his matches, he is not
: necessarily a 4.0. That 3.49 will probably beat a 3.01 and that does not
: make him a 4.0. He should beat weaker players. If he consistently beats
: other 3.49
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 20 What happens if I win a weak opponent 7:6, 7:6, then win
a strong opponent 6:1, 6:2 (say that guy is sick that day)?
if
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Yes.
: Here are more about how the rating is calculated:
: - Ratings are directly affected by: 1) Your partner; 2) Your opponent's
: dynamic rating; 3) Your current dynamic rating; 4) The closeness of the
: match (regardless of whether it was a win or a loss).
: - Ratings are not directly affected by: 1) What position you play; 2) Your
: wins and losses; 3) Team standings; 4) Age
: Remember win or loss doesn't matter. It is about the competitiveness. So if
: you really want to move up:
: - Destroy the weaker or c
|
|
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 21 after 76 76, your rating may not be changed or just drop a little bit. but after 61 61, your rating should have a big jump. so overall it is up.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: What happens if I win a weak opponent 7:6, 7:6, then win
: a strong opponent 6:1, 6:2 (say that guy is sick that day)?
:
: if
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 22 Compare with a more normal scenario:
6:1, 6:2 weak opponent, then 7:6 7:6 strong opponent.
Which one has higher rating in the end?
after
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: after 76 76, your rating may not be changed or just drop a little bit. but after 61 61, your rating should have a big jump. so overall it is up.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 23 not sure. but i prefer the first case :)
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Compare with a more normal scenario:
: 6:1, 6:2 weak opponent, then 7:6 7:6 strong opponent.
: Which one has higher rating in the end?
:
: after
|
t*******e
发帖数: 53 | 24 i won most 3.0 matches 6:1 or 6:2...lost my 3.5 matches on third set and
sometimes lost at 7:5...but not sure if they are high 3.5 or weak 3.5...i need to workout more...i am out of gas on 3rd set and produce more UEs :(... |
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 25 be careful man!
If you are self-rated and won most of matches 61 62, it is very likely you will get strikes and then disqualified. You gotta win 64 64 la!
need to workout more...i am out of gas on 3rd set and produce more UEs :(...
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: i won most 3.0 matches 6:1 or 6:2...lost my 3.5 matches on third set and
: sometimes lost at 7:5...but not sure if they are high 3.5 or weak 3.5...i need to workout more...i am out of gas on 3rd set and produce more UEs :(...
|
t*******e
发帖数: 53 | 26 i thought self-rated 2.5 can beat 4.0...so....//run... :-))...but there was one 3.5 guy who beat me at 6:1 6:3...which makes me feel really a 3.0...all other 3.5 matches are close matches..
will get strikes and then disqualified. You gotta win 64 64 la!
..
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: be careful man!
: If you are self-rated and won most of matches 61 62, it is very likely you will get strikes and then disqualified. You gotta win 64 64 la!
:
: need to workout more...i am out of gas on 3rd set and produce more UEs :(...
|
S***e
发帖数: 4426 | 27 then he must be a sandbagger...
was one 3.5 guy who beat me at 6:1
6:3...which makes me feel really a 3.0...all other 3.5 matches are close
matches..
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: i thought self-rated 2.5 can beat 4.0...so....//run... :-))...but there was one 3.5 guy who beat me at 6:1 6:3...which makes me feel really a 3.0...all other 3.5 matches are close matches..
:
: will get strikes and then disqualified. You gotta win 64 64 la!
: ..
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 28 a self-rated 2.5 can play up without any strike problem. but if he plays at 2.5, there may be the issue.
Losing a match badly doesn't matter as long as your overall performance is competitive. So don't let one big win or one bad lose make yourself up or down often.
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: i thought self-rated 2.5 can beat 4.0...so....//run... :-))...but there was one 3.5 guy who beat me at 6:1 6:3...which makes me feel really a 3.0...all other 3.5 matches are close matches..
:
: will get strikes and then disqualified. You gotta win 64 64 la!
: ..
|
d*******e
发帖数: 589 | 29 co-ask...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Where are the sandbaggers?
|
f**********g
发帖数: 1056 | 30 插一句行不？
我觉得讨论小数点后的rating没有意义的。对于4.0以下的业余选手，客观条件对比赛
的影响超过了选手本身的技术。比赛时的身体状态，心情，天气，球场环境等的客观影
响，远超过了所谓0.25的技术区别。 |
|
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 31 你讲的这些东西对所有地球人都有影响...
【在 f**********g 的大作中提到】
: 插一句行不？
: 我觉得讨论小数点后的rating没有意义的。对于4.0以下的业余选手，客观条件对比赛
: 的影响超过了选手本身的技术。比赛时的身体状态，心情，天气，球场环境等的客观影
: 响，远超过了所谓0.25的技术区别。
|
