z*********n
发帖数: 94654 | 1 呵呵，今天日也盼夜也盼的球拍终于来了
掂了掂，没太觉出来比我这个oversize的典型big 5球拍重多少
一查数据，差个两oz的样子，呵呵
这一点点重量，究竟有啥差别呢？
当然我知道球拍的性能多去了，重量只是其中一点
就是有点不太能想得通为啥很多人说轻的球拍使不上力啥的
说到底就差那么一点点... |
w********u
发帖数: 1865 | 2 2oz差别非常大！
oversize是握起来觉得重，因为head heavy。
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，今天日也盼夜也盼的球拍终于来了
: 掂了掂，没太觉出来比我这个oversize的典型big 5球拍重多少
: 一查数据，差个两oz的样子，呵呵
: 这一点点重量，究竟有啥差别呢？
: 当然我知道球拍的性能多去了，重量只是其中一点
: 就是有点不太能想得通为啥很多人说轻的球拍使不上力啥的
: 说到底就差那么一点点...
|
z*********n
发帖数: 94654 | 3 的确
oversize的打起来非常沉重
【在 w********u 的大作中提到】
: 2oz差别非常大！
: oversize是握起来觉得重，因为head heavy。
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 4 Not always true. It's just that your hammer OS happens to be heavy
swinging.
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: 的确
: oversize的打起来非常沉重
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 5 Originally I thought you were talking about 0.2-0.3oz.
I was like "yeah, maybe not too much a big deal."
Now I realize you were talking about 2oz... That's like 25%
heavier.
I can't wait to see your report on the new racket, hehe.
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，今天日也盼夜也盼的球拍终于来了
: 掂了掂，没太觉出来比我这个oversize的典型big 5球拍重多少
: 一查数据，差个两oz的样子，呵呵
: 这一点点重量，究竟有啥差别呢？
: 当然我知道球拍的性能多去了，重量只是其中一点
: 就是有点不太能想得通为啥很多人说轻的球拍使不上力啥的
: 说到底就差那么一点点...
|
b*****t
发帖数: 758 | 6 i guess it depends. When i changed from a 280g racquet to a 320g racquet. I
can hardly feel the weight difference.
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，今天日也盼夜也盼的球拍终于来了
: 掂了掂，没太觉出来比我这个oversize的典型big 5球拍重多少
: 一查数据，差个两oz的样子，呵呵
: 这一点点重量，究竟有啥差别呢？
: 当然我知道球拍的性能多去了，重量只是其中一点
: 就是有点不太能想得通为啥很多人说轻的球拍使不上力啥的
: 说到底就差那么一点点...
|
Y**s
发帖数: 1632 | 7 the balance of the racket will result in significant differences in swing
weight. Even though your new racket is heavier, it's got a more head-light
design so that when you swing it it doesn't feel like a big head0-heavy '
hammer'. The smaller head also cuts through the air a little better so that
probably also helps you with the perception.
How do you like it so far? Keep in mind that the strings on this thing is
freaking ancient... lol I played with it like 2 times before putting it
away, |
b**k
发帖数: 11850 | 8 还要加上swing weight difference
挥得动->挥得快，中间好大一块呢
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，今天日也盼夜也盼的球拍终于来了
: 掂了掂，没太觉出来比我这个oversize的典型big 5球拍重多少
: 一查数据，差个两oz的样子，呵呵
: 这一点点重量，究竟有啥差别呢？
: 当然我知道球拍的性能多去了，重量只是其中一点
: 就是有点不太能想得通为啥很多人说轻的球拍使不上力啥的
: 说到底就差那么一点点...
|
a****n
发帖数: 4734 | 9 2, 3个oz 如果加在拍柄，差别可能不大。
如果加在拍头，那就不能说不大。 |
z*********n
发帖数: 94654 | 10 还没玩，昨晚又有事。今天玩
空挥了一下，貌似挥起来比我那个大头快多了，哈哈
light
that
【在 Y**s 的大作中提到】
: the balance of the racket will result in significant differences in swing
: weight. Even though your new racket is heavier, it's got a more head-light
: design so that when you swing it it doesn't feel like a big head0-heavy '
: hammer'. The smaller head also cuts through the air a little better so that
: probably also helps you with the perception.
: How do you like it so far? Keep in mind that the strings on this thing is
: freaking ancient... lol I played with it like 2 times before putting it
: away,
|
h*******s
发帖数: 8454 | 11 第一段完全同意
light
that
【在 Y**s 的大作中提到】
: the balance of the racket will result in significant differences in swing
: weight. Even though your new racket is heavier, it's got a more head-light
: design so that when you swing it it doesn't feel like a big head0-heavy '
: hammer'. The smaller head also cuts through the air a little better so that
: probably also helps you with the perception.
: How do you like it so far? Keep in mind that the strings on this thing is
: freaking ancient... lol I played with it like 2 times before putting it
: away,
|
h*e
发帖数: 10233 | |
