n****e
发帖数: 226 | 1 巴马会还么？
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557 | v*****o
发帖数: 113 | | n****e
发帖数: 226 | 3 obama got more than Hillary and McCain combined from Goldman
【在 v*****o 的大作中提到】
: 两边都捐了吧
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 4 几百万的捐款算个屁. Goldman Saches一年就赚几千亿。
It is like I donate 1 cents to Obama.
拿着$994,795说事多不觉得搞笑。
【在 n****e 的大作中提到】
: 巴马会还么？
: University of California $1,591,395
: Goldman Sachs $994,795
: Harvard University $854,747
: Microsoft Corp $833,617
: Google Inc $803,436
: Citigroup Inc $701,290
: JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
: Time Warner $590,084
: Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 5 gop已经把捐款都退给GS了.
obama呢?
什么时候把狗屎吐出来?
我慢慢发现你Y是有任务在身的.不是什么脑残.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 几百万的捐款算个屁. Goldman Saches一年就赚几千亿。
: It is like I donate 1 cents to Obama.
: 拿着$994,795说事多不觉得搞笑。
| O*****g
发帖数: 1257 | 6 "Goldman Saches一年就赚几千亿"
又来一个信口开河的
epic fail
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 几百万的捐款算个屁. Goldman Saches一年就赚几千亿。
: It is like I donate 1 cents to Obama.
: 拿着$994,795说事多不觉得搞笑。
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 7 又一个信口开河的, 您太搞笑了.
Goldman Sach 2009 给雇员发了1400亿的花红,不包括日常的工资, 加上1140亿的纯利
润, 共收入2340亿,这还不包括工资.
So learn something before open your filth month.
【在 O*****g 的大作中提到】
: "Goldman Saches一年就赚几千亿"
: 又来一个信口开河的
: epic fail
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 8 $%&*(%^)@#*
我他妈要晕倒了,哪个好心人给我点水.
我知道你加减法不会做,没想到,你连数数也不会.
http://www.google.com/finance?fstype=ii&q=NYSE:GS&axs=1
3 months____2009-12-31____2009-09-25____2009-06-26___2009-03-27
Net Income__4,948.00______3,188.00______3,435.00_____1,814.00
14 billion是多少个零啊? 你Y数的清吗?
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 又一个信口开河的, 您太搞笑了.
: Goldman Sach 2009 给雇员发了1400亿的花红,不包括日常的工资, 加上1140亿的纯利
: 润, 共收入2340亿,这还不包括工资.
: So learn something before open your filth month.
| t***e
发帖数: 3601 | 9 He's using RMB as unit.
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: $%&*(%^)@#*
: 我他妈要晕倒了,哪个好心人给我点水.
: 我知道你加减法不会做,没想到,你连数数也不会.
: http://www.google.com/finance?fstype=ii&q=NYSE:GS&axs=1
: 3 months____2009-12-31____2009-09-25____2009-06-26___2009-03-27
: Net Income__4,948.00______3,188.00______3,435.00_____1,814.00
: 14 billion是多少个零啊? 你Y数的清吗?
| O*****g
发帖数: 1257 | 10 It's so easy to debate Libtards, just use logic and facts.
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: $%&*(%^)@#*
: 我他妈要晕倒了,哪个好心人给我点水.
: 我知道你加减法不会做,没想到,你连数数也不会.
: http://www.google.com/finance?fstype=ii&q=NYSE:GS&axs=1
: 3 months____2009-12-31____2009-09-25____2009-06-26___2009-03-27
: Net Income__4,948.00______3,188.00______3,435.00_____1,814.00
: 14 billion是多少个零啊? 你Y数的清吗?
| | | O*****g
发帖数: 1257 | 11 Well, consider the original title used dollar as unit, it is mighty stupid
of him/her to use RMB. And he/she didn't specify as so in his/her post
either.
【在 t***e 的大作中提到】
: He's using RMB as unit.
| t***e
发帖数: 3601 | 12 Ditto
【在 O*****g 的大作中提到】
: Well, consider the original title used dollar as unit, it is mighty stupid
: of him/her to use RMB. And he/she didn't specify as so in his/her post
: either.
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 13 不管你怎么spin,对高盛来说,1百万就是个屁.
还有一些人就拿 net profit当收入.高盛50%的收入是用来发年终奖金的. Net profit
就是个零头. 就跟这些人拿 insurance 3% profit当成本一样,事实上保险公司的成本
更接近 30%. 不要拿Rove的那一套就想着这样spin.拿着GOP的托 写的保护insurance
company的那一套 又用来保护.华尔街
【在 n****e 的大作中提到】
: 巴马会还么？
: University of California $1,591,395
: Goldman Sachs $994,795
: Harvard University $854,747
: Microsoft Corp $833,617
: Google Inc $803,436
: Citigroup Inc $701,290
: JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
: Time Warner $590,084
: Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 14 你居然还有脸回这个贴,libtards脸皮真tm是金刚石炼的.
profit
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 不管你怎么spin,对高盛来说,1百万就是个屁.
: 还有一些人就拿 net profit当收入.高盛50%的收入是用来发年终奖金的. Net profit
: 就是个零头. 就跟这些人拿 insurance 3% profit当成本一样,事实上保险公司的成本
: 更接近 30%. 不要拿Rove的那一套就想着这样spin.拿着GOP的托 写的保护insurance
: company的那一套 又用来保护.华尔街
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 15 我在想那些支持保险公司的纯利润只有3%,保险公司就是好的人就因该支持 国家 的
medicare.medicare的纯利润是0%. 3%>>0%.我们立即就可以省好多钱.而且medicare 的人头费要远低于保险公司.
profit
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 不管你怎么spin,对高盛来说,1百万就是个屁.
: 还有一些人就拿 net profit当收入.高盛50%的收入是用来发年终奖金的. Net profit
: 就是个零头. 就跟这些人拿 insurance 3% profit当成本一样,事实上保险公司的成本
: 更接近 30%. 不要拿Rove的那一套就想着这样spin.拿着GOP的托 写的保护insurance
: company的那一套 又用来保护.华尔街
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 16 not only does medicare not make any money, they are losing money, losing big
!
but the key is,
they dont get to lose their own money, what they lose is our tax payer's
money, the money collected by government mafia through guns and machines.
的人头费要远低于保险公司.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 我在想那些支持保险公司的纯利润只有3%,保险公司就是好的人就因该支持 国家 的
: medicare.medicare的纯利润是0%. 3%>>0%.我们立即就可以省好多钱.而且medicare 的人头费要远低于保险公司.
:
: profit
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 17 你说说Goldma内员工收入多少.Goldman的捐款时Goldman的员工给的,Golman的员工年终
奖金6-7十万美元,>>golman net profit. 又是一个拿net profit 当成本的主.不奇怪
GOP托写的文章多是这样的. Insurance profit is 3% so insurance companies are
not the problem of health care,. Laughable.
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: 你居然还有脸回这个贴,libtards脸皮真tm是金刚石炼的.
:
: profit
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 18 how much i make is non of your business, you communist LIBTARD, do you
understand?
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 你说说Goldma内员工收入多少.Goldman的捐款时Goldman的员工给的,Golman的员工年终
: 奖金6-7十万美元,>>golman net profit. 又是一个拿net profit 当成本的主.不奇怪
: GOP托写的文章多是这样的. Insurance profit is 3% so insurance companies are
: not the problem of health care,. Laughable.
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 19 Insurance companies lose much more money than medicare. Insurance companies
collect $1 money (tax) from us and pay out only 70 cents. Steal 30 cents
from us. For medicare, government collects $1 from us, pay out 87 cents and
steal 13 cents. Insurance companies are worse than government.
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: not only does medicare not make any money, they are losing money, losing big
: !
: but the key is,
: they dont get to lose their own money, what they lose is our tax payer's
: money, the money collected by government mafia through guns and machines.
:
: 的人头费要远低于保险公司.
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 20 if you dont like it, dont buy it, isn't that simple?
companies
and
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: Insurance companies lose much more money than medicare. Insurance companies
: collect $1 money (tax) from us and pay out only 70 cents. Steal 30 cents
: from us. For medicare, government collects $1 from us, pay out 87 cents and
: steal 13 cents. Insurance companies are worse than government.
| | | m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 21 Naive. Can you not buy your meal if you feel the meal is overpriced? In your
logic, you can move to other country, if you do not like current policy.
Please do not bitch then
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: if you dont like it, dont buy it, isn't that simple?
:
: companies
: and
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 22 SO I understand now. For GOP support, it is ok to have a expensive health
insurance policy. high cost of health care is good as long as it is driven
by the private monopoly insurance companies. Because you still have "freedom
" not to buy your insurance. But lots of people do not think so. So comes
reform.
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: if you dont like it, dont buy it, isn't that simple?
:
: companies
: and
| m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 23 So let the private industries monopoly the agriculture products. They can
charge you $100 per lb of chicken, $200 for pork and $1000 for beaf. it is
absolutely fine because it is from the private companies. You have the "
freedom" not to buy those products. Yep, Free market at work.
driven
freedom
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: SO I understand now. For GOP support, it is ok to have a expensive health
: insurance policy. high cost of health care is good as long as it is driven
: by the private monopoly insurance companies. Because you still have "freedom
: " not to buy your insurance. But lots of people do not think so. So comes
: reform.
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 24 what do you mean?
if the meal is too expensive to buy, i go cook myself.
your
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: Naive. Can you not buy your meal if you feel the meal is overpriced? In your
: logic, you can move to other country, if you do not like current policy.
: Please do not bitch then
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 25 I am not a gop supporters, before you start your smear, get your facts
straight.
driven
freedom
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: SO I understand now. For GOP support, it is ok to have a expensive health
: insurance policy. high cost of health care is good as long as it is driven
: by the private monopoly insurance companies. Because you still have "freedom
: " not to buy your insurance. But lots of people do not think so. So comes
: reform.
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 26 no, monopoly is not free market, given it is government monopoly or private
monopoly.
government role as a judge is to prevent that happen, like they try to do
with microsoft. while government as a judge shall not join the market as a
player.
this is politics 101.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: So let the private industries monopoly the agriculture products. They can
: charge you $100 per lb of chicken, $200 for pork and $1000 for beaf. it is
: absolutely fine because it is from the private companies. You have the "
: freedom" not to buy those products. Yep, Free market at work.
:
: driven
: freedom
| y****t
发帖数: 10233 | 27 不知道说过多少遍的东西了.
这帮libtards果然无大脑,既没有思考功能,也没有存储功能,除了跟着复读talking
points,
like obama repeating teleprompters.
private
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】
: no, monopoly is not free market, given it is government monopoly or private
: monopoly.
: government role as a judge is to prevent that happen, like they try to do
: with microsoft. while government as a judge shall not join the market as a
: player.
: this is politics 101.
| n****e
发帖数: 226 | 28 Well, I have no problem with Goldman's donation, or Obama taking it for that
matter. But he took the money, then now acted so high and mighty. Just
feel it is a little hypocritical. That's all.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 几百万的捐款算个屁. Goldman Saches一年就赚几千亿。
: It is like I donate 1 cents to Obama.
: 拿着$994,795说事多不觉得搞笑。
|
|
