l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 Imagine That: Supposedly Mythical 'No-Go Zones' Are Back in the News — But
Not at U.S. Media Outlets
By Tom Blumer | January 11, 2016 | 10:27 AM EST
Despite reports and statements containing the term coming out of Germany
during the past week, searches at the Associated Press on "no-go zones," and
even on "no-go," return nothing. The New York Times has no recent report
identifying European no-go zones, but has at least demonstrated that it
might be getting over its nearly allergic reaction to the term by observing
that parts of Ramadi, Iraq recently liberated from Islamic State control are
"no-go zones because they have yet to be searched for booby traps left by
the jihadists."
"No-go zones" again became news because, despite U.S. media outlets
continued denial of their existence, several officials in Germany once again
used the term.
After the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris a year ago, Andrew McCarthy
usefully and succinctly described no-go zones as follows:
Islamic enclaves ... (in France are) referred to as "no go zones"
because the indigenous populations discourage the presence of non-Muslims
who do not conform to Islamic standards of dress and social interaction, and
of public officials - police, fire-fighters, emergency medical teams, and
building inspectors - who are seen as symbols of the state's effort to
exercise sovereignty in areas Muslims seek to possess adversely.
As Breitbart London reported on December 30, German officials acknowledged
the problem even before the wave of "migrant" sexual assaults which took
place on New Year's Eve (bolds are mine throughout this post, and links are
in originals):
No-Go Zones: German Police Admit To Losing Control Of Immigrant ‘
Problem Neighbourhoods’
The development of so-called “problem neighbourhoods” or “lawless
neighbourhoods” in Germany over the course of 2015 has made law enforcement
impossible in some areas, according to police reports.
The latest admission of the developing problem of no-go zones in Europe
comes from state police in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), a west German state
that borders Belgium and the Netherlands. Here, an inquiry by a
Conservative Democratic Union (CDU) politician into the state of policing
has elicited an embarrassing admission of failure by local police to keep
the situation under control.
In Germany, state police are responsible for local law enforcement, but
in emergencies can call upon Federal police and appeal to neighbouring
states for support. The CDU parliamentary deputy Gregor Golland’s question
had revealed 78 per cent of all local regions within NRW have had to bring
in external re-enforcements this year due to migrant criminal gangs, reports
the Rheinische Post.
... CDU deputy Gregor Golland has criticised the political establishment
in NRW for allowing this state of affairs for developing, where “criminal
parallel societies are seeking the upper hand, or those already solidifying
”. He said police must be better equipped to deal with the problem.
This is not by far the first time politicians and police officers have
spoken out about no-go zones and rising migrant crime and violence. High-
profile woman police officer Tania Kambouri remarked on the subject during
an interview this month, as she discussed the lack of respect young Muslim
men displayed towards their new home, and the officers who keep the law in
it.
Stating that young Muslim men proudly proclaim “shit on Germany”, Mrs.
Kambouri said police had already lost control in some areas of the country.
The officer also expressed concern that anyone who brought up these issues
was instantly discredited by being denounced as a “Nazi”.
After the New Year's Even chaos in Cologne — just one of many events
during as a result of which "hundreds of reports of assault (were) made to
police across Germany" — an official spoke the truth, with what would
appear to be some political risk:
Speaking of the broader problems faced by NRW, ... (Angela Merkel ally
and local Christian Democratic Union party vice-chair Armin) Laschet also
spoke of the “no-go zones” in the state. Rejecting the suggestion using
such terms was alarmist, he said: “There are in this state no-go areas…
even today police in the districts of Duisberg and Gelsenkirchen no longer
have the situation under control. There are lawless areas.
In what should be another slap in the face at those in the U.S. press who
refuse to acknowledge the term, it turns out that no-go zones have existed
and acknowledged in Germany for at least four years:
In 2011, the commander of the German Police, Bernhard Witthaut,
described police "no-go zones" in the country. "In these areas, crimes no
longer result in charges. They are left to themselves. Only in the worst
cases do we in the police learn anything about it. The power of the state is
completely out of the picture." When it turned out that parts of the city
of Duisburg, not far from Cologne, are police "no-go zones,” local
officials stressed that "anyone who tries anything, is immediately branded
as a radical right-winger."
Yet the term "no-go zone" has been virtually blacklisted by the U.S.
establishment press.
Perhaps the latest no-go zone development might break the ice, given its
potential effect on U.S. citizens who might consider attending public events
in Germany:
“The truth is, the Cologne Central Station and the area around Cologne
Cathedral on New Year’s Eve was a no-go area, a legal vacuum for women.
This is not acceptable”.
Well, it may not be "acceptable," but, until further notice, it apparently
is the current situation that women put their personal safety at risk any
time they choose to attend or participate in any public event or celebration
in the named area, or in other similar areas in other German cities.
Elaborating further on this state of affairs, Carol Brown at American
Thinker, reacting to Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker's remarks effectively
blaming female victims themselves for what transpired, made the following
sadly accurate analogy:
Anyone who suggests that all would be well if only Germany’s women and
girls would take greater care not to bring rape upon themselves is not fit
to serve in public office. (That would be you.)
And how might they better prepare themselves, as you suggest? By not
going out alone? That’s sharia. Or by going out with a male chaperone in
order “to be more protected”? That’s sharia. Or by avoiding Western dress
? That’s sharia.
How dare this mayor put the onus on women to make sure they’re not
raped? This is the essence of dhimmitude. This is how the West is handing
over the keys to the kingdom. The enemy is not named. The enemy is not held
responsible. Instead, the enemy is welcomed and indulged.
Part of that indulgence is involves the press's deliberate failure to tell
its readers, listeners and viewers what "the enemy" is doing — including
establishing "no-go zones."
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com. | T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 2 如果法律还是老大的话，就不应该有这种no go zone。无论是以什么善，美的名义。
和AA一样，明明是宗族歧视，打着对一部分人“善”的旗号（同时对一部分人恶就没人
提了）就可以横行无忌。 |
|
