s******9
发帖数: 1451 | 1 那些以为有了警察保护，自己就可以免受歹徒伤害的，不要做梦妄想了，警察不是你的
私人保镖。保护你和家人的安全，是你自己的责任。你可以不拥枪，但不要散布谎言误
导别人。否则到时候哭都来不及。
https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html
https://fee.org/articles/just-dial-911-the-myth-of-police-protection/
“Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone”
“The Police Have No Obligation To Protect You. Yes, Really.”
“Police protection must be recognized for what it is: only an auxiliary
general deterrent.”
“Professor Don B. Kates, Jr., eminent civil rights lawyer and criminologist
, states:
Even if all 500,000 American police officers were assigned to patrol, they
could not protect 240 million citizens from upwards of 10 million criminals
who enjoy the luxury of deciding when and where to strike. But we have
nothing like 500,000 patrol officers; to determine how many police are
actually available for any one shift, we must divide the 500,000 by four (
three shifts per day, plus officers who have days off, are on sick leave,
etc.). The resulting number must be cut in half to account for officers
assigned to investigations, juvenile, records, laboratory, traffic, etc.,
rather than patrol.” | s******9
发帖数: 1451 | 2 The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them,
but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that
it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its
agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police
protection, to any individual citizen." [4] There are many similar cases
with results to the same effect. | f****l
发帖数: 8042 | 3 警车上写的protection那是啥子意思
that
police
【在 s******9 的大作中提到】
: The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them,
: but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that
: it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its
: agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police
: protection, to any individual citizen." [4] There are many similar cases
: with results to the same effect.
| n****g
发帖数: 14743 | 4 车门上刷的叫“标语”
them,
its
【在 f****l 的大作中提到】
: 警车上写的protection那是啥子意思
:
: that
: police
| s**********d
发帖数: 36899 | 5 逗你玩的
【在 f****l 的大作中提到】
: 警车上写的protection那是啥子意思
:
: that
: police
| s******9
发帖数: 1451 | 6 等于中国的“构建和谐社会”，“中国梦”。
【在 f****l 的大作中提到】
: 警车上写的protection那是啥子意思
:
: that
: police
| j****3
发帖数: 2836 | 7 这个教授的解释其实已经美化了，把警察没有义务保护个人安全归因于警力有限，因而
即使想保护每个人也做不到。其实冷酷的真相是，即使警察碰上了正在进行的犯罪，也
没义务一定要制止犯罪。警察的工作就是把犯法的人捉拿归案，现场抓获或者事后抓获
并不重要。所以在奥兰多夜总会还有其他一些的场合，我们都看见警察到了现场后也是
慢悠悠的，确定对自己风险最小后才会进去。自己没枪完全指望警察的人，就等着警察
来收尸吧。
Someone”
criminologist
【在 s******9 的大作中提到】
: 那些以为有了警察保护，自己就可以免受歹徒伤害的，不要做梦妄想了，警察不是你的
: 私人保镖。保护你和家人的安全，是你自己的责任。你可以不拥枪，但不要散布谎言误
: 导别人。否则到时候哭都来不及。
: https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html
: https://fee.org/articles/just-dial-911-the-myth-of-police-protection/
: “Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone”
: “The Police Have No Obligation To Protect You. Yes, Really.”
: “Police protection must be recognized for what it is: only an auxiliary
: general deterrent.”
: “Professor Don B. Kates, Jr., eminent civil rights lawyer and criminologist
|
|
