p*****a
发帖数: 3634 | 1 and advance again at the beginning of FY2013 |
|
|
s******t
发帖数: 926 | 3 Given the tiny oversupply, 10-20k, I doubt O would even bother to retro it.
Holding it steady is a good approach for his "excellent" job performance.
Theoretically, the "TRUE" PD should be in 2009, but we are not in an ideal
world. |
|
l****i
发帖数: 3339 | 4 我觉得o傻不会花大功夫去算这个mid of 2009
感觉Jan 01, 09 对o傻来讲更简单 更保险啊 |
|
p*****a
发帖数: 3634 | 5 He might take some risk to waster visa number if he sets VB at 1/1/09. |
|
|
a*******8
发帖数: 156 | 7 I dont believe so. no one likes retro and 10-20k is not too much. If retro
back to 09 in july and move advance 2 years in NOV, too much chaos and
become a joke. |
|
p*****a
发帖数: 3634 | 8 If retro back to 09 in July, there is on reason to advance 2 years in Nov. |
|
i****d
发帖数: 724 | 9 O怎么样也是名校出身，再说VB倒退到1/1/2009基本上是要浪费一些名额了。 |
|
|
|
h********s
发帖数: 256 | 12 那如果再前进能前进到哪儿？2013排期到2011.05?
pd 2009 -> geen in 2013
pd 2010 -> green in 2014
pd 2011 -> green in 2015? |
|
|
a*****9
发帖数: 293 | 14 我觉得VB大幅倒退的可能性不大。在接下来的半年时间里，VB很可能停滞或缓慢前进，
而到了2013财年又会继续稳步前进。我觉得O傻不傻，他掌握的数据比我们多且准确，
近期的VB日期都是经过精心考虑和计算的。季度27%指标使得SO不再被浪费，而且3012
众院海过，使得VB快速前进。即使现在3012不死不活，他也会预留部分名额，以防3012
万一通过而造成名额浪费。所以我认为VB不会大幅倒退，停止或缓慢前进最有可能。一
家之言，欢迎讨论。 |
|
