d********1 发帖数: 1698 | 1 没有比P838 更准确的了, 至于组织嘛, 也就是从大局上给大家侃侃, 不会有什么效果
的.
VB 不动-P838 已经说了.
消息其实没有价值, 但奇怪的是大家总在等消息:绝望中充满希望.
比如我这题目, 就会让很多人来看, 如果大家回帖多, 看得人就更多了.
我每天来这里10多次, 总希望有奇迹..但总失望. 但还总来, 直到哪天被裁了...或绿
了.
所以在这里大家说说, 开个玩笑都没有什么, 但别欺骗大家( 比如那个P8838).也别骂
人骂过头,
大家心情都不好.. |
|
s****r 发帖数: 126 | 2 Be realistic and not emotional, take a look at 485 pending inventory, it
should be clear that, though I understand a lot of guys here are waiting for
submit EAD & AP, the Oct VB for EB2C/I should be around May 01 2006. |
|
g*******t 发帖数: 552 | 3 赞理性分析.考虑到9月排期为了不浪费名额放宽了些,10月VB 5月22是最好结果.
=
21 |
|
I******6 发帖数: 500 | 4 如果 像 P838 说的。 中国9月 未批的 “少于750”. 那么 NOV VB 不 会 到 6/8号的 |
|
|
H****g 发帖数: 342 | 6 不对, VB 是 瞎蹦的·。有时过于保守,有时过头。 如果 11不动,12 月就会小蹦一
下· |
|
i*****g 发帖数: 8 | 7 P838 predicted no movement for October VB as well. We all know how good
that prediction was.
Didn't Mr. O said slow movement (1-2 weeks at a time) for the next few
VBs?
My guess is 6/1 for EB2, but who knows. Just wait till the end of the
week and you will see. |
|
o********8 发帖数: 142 | 8 我也来拿包子.
NOV VB预测: EB2 C: June 08, 2006 |
|
|
y****i 发帖数: 1504 | 10 这样太夸张了,12月VB就coming soon了。 |
|
g*******t 发帖数: 552 | 11 if not this Dec VB, then Jan 2011 for sure, no big difference. |
|
l*****f 发帖数: 2198 | 12 guys, come back after 2 weeks to check the December VB.
it's too early now. |
|
l*****f 发帖数: 2198 | 13 上个月的DEMAND DATA就是十二号才出的。。比VB晚了三天。 |
|
|
g*****7 发帖数: 324 | 15 1月 VB: Sept. 1, 2006
To be confirmed in a few days.
大家要给移民局施加压力。 |
|
g*****7 发帖数: 324 | 16 1月 VB: Sept. 1, 2006
To be confirmed in a few days.
大家要给移民局施加压力。 |
|
k****2 发帖数: 211 | 17 copy from VB:
Employment-based: At this time it is unlikely that there will be any cut-off
dates in the Employment First preference during the coming months. It also
appears unlikely that it will be necessary to establish a cut-off date other
than those already in effect for the Second preference category. Cut-off
dates continue to apply to the China and India Second preference categories
due to heavy demand.
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off
date moveme... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******0 发帖数: 1340 | 18 老O不早说了,VB每月前进0-2周,还做什么前进3周的梦? |
|
N*********L 发帖数: 517 | 19 Regarding Feb VB, here is response from Mr. O.
"I provided projections for the coming months in the bulletin with the
December dates. I do not expect any forward movement in the Family dates
for at least several months, and hope that I do not have to retrogress those
dates further. Employment is fine."
We will continue following up with Mr. O provide you the updates.
Your suggestion is highly appreciated.
NIU |
|
f*******e 发帖数: 4531 | 20 没有专门问FB,问的是VB的今后走势,O就把FB和EB分别介绍了一下。 |
|
m*******e 发帖数: 44 | 21 March VB EB2 08 July , 2006
EB3 22Jan 04 |
|
m*******e 发帖数: 44 | 22 Apr VB EB2 July 22, 2006 EB3 March 01, 2004 |
|
|
c******m 发帖数: 1140 | 24 我还以为4月vb排到2010年7月22号!!!!!!!!! |
|
m********7 发帖数: 1791 | 25 I guess,
US government may shut down after Apr 8th for about 7-14 days.
May VB may be out after Apr 21th with big movement in date
EB2I and EB2C to Nov/8/2006
just guess. |
|
|
p**8 发帖数: 3883 | 27 真新闻 May VB = Aug 1, 2006 |
|
p**8 发帖数: 3883 | 28 发信人: p838 (失去自由的矿工), 信区: EB23
标 题: Re: 今夏VB能到2006年底吗?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 6 19:32:17 2011, 美东)
if your PD is Oct, 100%
if your PD is Nov, 85%
if your PD is first half of Dec, 70%.
if your PD is second half of Dec, 50%.
Good Luck! |
|
j*e 发帖数: 1987 | 29 May Demand Data has not been out. Usually Demand Data is out a couple of
days before VB it out. |
|
zg 发帖数: 113 | 30 Since there is the possibility of government shut down, to avoid
interruption of USCIS work, very possibly DOS will rush out VB on Friday.
It is just a guess by P838, I think. |
|
b*******l 发帖数: 1737 | 31 对不对等VB出来了不久知道了嘛。你现在怎么早攻击他干啥? |
|
k****a 发帖数: 7077 | 32 O傻刚才的答复是也许要等很久VB才能出来,要么P838撒谎,要么O傻装傻。 |
|
|
k****a 发帖数: 7077 | 34 说是government shutdown几成定局。
又说打电话问VB的人太多,推迟IT决定, WTF。 |
|
e******u 发帖数: 3206 | 35 没事不要都去打电话,添乱。
说是government shutdown几成定局。又说打电话问VB的人太多,推迟IT决定, WTF。
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs 6.82 - iPad Lite |
|
s****l 发帖数: 16457 | 36 不明白,不出vb就不用处理EB3转的了?他们就占不了EB2的名额了? |
|
r****e 发帖数: 3109 | 37 vb always falls on 1, 8, 15, 22 |
|
zg 发帖数: 113 | 38 When the AILA post came out, some cheered it as good news.
I said it is bad news, and it was paving the way for Mr.O's May VB which
would favor Indian.
It turned out true. |
|
j*e 发帖数: 1987 | 39 这段是奥本在5月VB里面添加的新料,以前没见过。"Since under INA Section 203(e)
such numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of
chargeability, greater number use by one country would indicate greater
demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates. Based
on amount and priority dates of pending demand and year-to-date number use,
a different cut-off date could be applied to each oversubscribed country,
for the purpose of assuring that the maximum amount of available number... 阅读全帖 |
|
zg 发帖数: 113 | 40 Solomon knew the internal news of Indian reached limit in April. Mr.O used
solomon's argument in his VB, and he has chosen a way to benefit Indian the
most while limiting Chinese benefit to the least.
Now it almost sounds like a conspiracy to me.
Yesterday, I suggested that we should fight the AILA posting by Solomon... |
|
m*****t 发帖数: 3477 | 41 这是显而易见的。O就是为了不让VB倒退,所以尽量保证EB2I的PD能够有效前进,而
EB2C本质上就是原地踏步等着EB2I。
这样的话,SO绝大部分给了EB2I,今年C&I也就是一起前进到 NOV 06。然后下个年度松
开让C自己领先个把月,夏天再绑起来。
几年下来,看来就这样了。 |
|
s******0 发帖数: 1340 | 42 "making that determination in June" means no allocation in May for June VB? |
|
d*********g 发帖数: 349 | 43 请问p838, 照这个趋势7月vb能不能排到06年9月中旬阿?
谢过! |
|
p**8 发帖数: 3883 | 44 July VB.
12K -> Oct 2006.
in
of |
|
|
s******0 发帖数: 1340 | 46 估计6月VB到8/8/06.继续重复本财年的pattern. |
|
p**8 发帖数: 3883 | 47 寄信人: d*****
标 题: Re: 等七月VB吧。今年别希望太高了。
发信站: 未名空间 (Mon May 2 23:18:56 2011)
来 源: 68.55.
Hopefully he'll buy it. Thanks for your continuous efforts.
blackberry. |
|
d******8 发帖数: 1972 | 48 Thanks, wish big jump in JNLY VB. |
|
s******0 发帖数: 1340 | 49 我猜还是重复本财年的pattern, June VB 到8/8/2006.7月开始大幅前进. |
|
n**********s 发帖数: 236 | 50 My lawyer has connections, told me the June VB should be 9/1/2006.
I am not sure whether it's accurate or not.
Just for your reference. |
|