由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Automobile版 - 德日美韩Sedan Safety Rank Based on IIHS
相关主题
[合集] 德日美韩Sedan Safety Rank Based on IIHS今天去看了一辆Mazda Tribute
世界上最坚固的树经验分享:购买Ford车系(Ford/Mazda/Volvo等)的优惠
IIHS为啥没有单挑的测试我的Malibu 总评。
ALTIMA这车怎样啊别克GL8陆尊维修手册
SUV pk Minivan的相互优势?只有小孩子气的不懂车的穷人才整天美车,欧车,日车的互喷。
XC90 vs GLE 350 roof strength 测试,XC90被甩几条街买车求建议
忠实美车份也要了give up了菜市场买菜有感。
最近买车Credit Score要多少才能拿到最好的rate?连续看车有感慨
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: iihs话题: 4dr话题: model话题: better话题: safety
1 (共1页)
r********o
发帖数: 1423
1
俺老汉昨天中午lunch break自己做的。最后根据各车系所有sedan model的评分得出各
车系在large, mid 以及small 三种category上面的平均得分。
分数按照IIHS的substantial better, better, average, worse, substantial worse
,依次为2, 1, 0,-1,-2。最后各车系的评分排列大家自己比较。
声明,俺老汉不是做统计的。只是看大家这么各个国家大概的比不如量化了比,没其他
目的。有什么错误遗漏指出烦请指出来。
统计的excel附件在文章末尾。
最后得分为:
German Japan USA Korea
Scores for Large Model 1.64 1.50 0.89 0.00
Scores for Mid Model 0.48 -0.74 -0.82 -1.50
Scores for Small Model 0.33 -1.78
t*f
发帖数: 7
2
"分数按照IIHS的substantial better, better, average, worse, substantial worse
,依次为2, 1, 0,-1,-2。最后各车系的评分排列大家自己比较。"
I am not sure how meaningful this analysis is.
first of all, no one sane person buys a fleet of cars from a given maker. so
"averaging" doesn't make much sense.
2ndly, is "substantially better" twice as good as "better"? consider three
makers who produce two models each. Maker A's two models score "subtantially
better" and "substantially worse"; Maker B's two models "better" and "worse
",
r****y
发帖数: 26819
3
这个数据其实也是有商榷余地的。
比如:
Brand Injury Collision Theft
Mazda Tribute 4dr 72 66
Jeep Wrangler 2dr 74 75 109
Subaru Forester 4dr 76 76 12
Mercury Mariner 4dr 76 66
Ford Escape 4dr 78 67 20
BMW X3 4dr 80 80 31
Hyundai Santa Fe 4dr 86 70 26
Saturn VUE 4dr 87 81 27
Land Rover Freelander4dr89 100
Honda CR-V

【在 r********o 的大作中提到】
: 俺老汉昨天中午lunch break自己做的。最后根据各车系所有sedan model的评分得出各
: 车系在large, mid 以及small 三种category上面的平均得分。
: 分数按照IIHS的substantial better, better, average, worse, substantial worse
: ,依次为2, 1, 0,-1,-2。最后各车系的评分排列大家自己比较。
: 声明,俺老汉不是做统计的。只是看大家这么各个国家大概的比不如量化了比,没其他
: 目的。有什么错误遗漏指出烦请指出来。
: 统计的excel附件在文章末尾。
: 最后得分为:
: German Japan USA Korea
: Scores for Large Model 1.64 1.50 0.89 0.00

r*****g
发帖数: 9999
4
There is no strong evidence showing that euro car drivers are better than
jap car drivers. So the difference between driver should not be significant,
if there is any.
In addition, the ability of avoiding an accident should also be counted as
safety features. Airbags, strong frames provide passvie protection, while
ESC, ABS provide active protection. You can't based on your safety argument
on passive safety only.
If you really want to know the frequency of accident, you can look at the
next colu

【在 t*f 的大作中提到】
: "分数按照IIHS的substantial better, better, average, worse, substantial worse
: ,依次为2, 1, 0,-1,-2。最后各车系的评分排列大家自己比较。"
: I am not sure how meaningful this analysis is.
: first of all, no one sane person buys a fleet of cars from a given maker. so
: "averaging" doesn't make much sense.
: 2ndly, is "substantially better" twice as good as "better"? consider three
: makers who produce two models each. Maker A's two models score "subtantially
: better" and "substantially worse"; Maker B's two models "better" and "worse
: ",

1 (共1页)
相关主题
连续看车有感慨SUV pk Minivan的相互优势?
请教一个问题XC90 vs GLE 350 roof strength 测试,XC90被甩几条街
BMW 多久换一次机油!忠实美车份也要了give up了
投票说说看,砸砖也欢迎最近买车Credit Score要多少才能拿到最好的rate?
[合集] 德日美韩Sedan Safety Rank Based on IIHS今天去看了一辆Mazda Tribute
世界上最坚固的树经验分享:购买Ford车系(Ford/Mazda/Volvo等)的优惠
IIHS为啥没有单挑的测试我的Malibu 总评。
ALTIMA这车怎样啊别克GL8陆尊维修手册
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: iihs话题: 4dr话题: model话题: better话题: safety