b******g
发帖数: 16 | 1 VEHICLE #2 WAS TRAVELING NORTH ON COBB PARKWAY IN THE CENTER TURN LANE.
VEHICLE #1 WAS EXITING A PRIVATE DRIVE, WESTBOUND ONTO COBB PARKWAY.
VEHICLE #1 FAILED TO YIELD TO RIGHT OF WAY TRAFFIC WHILE TURNING LEFT, AND
STRUCK VEHICLE #2
AT AN ANGLE IN THE LEFT REAR PASSENGER DOOR, WITH THE RIGHT FRONT PART OF
THE BUMPER OF
VEHICLE #1.
VEHICLES SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE POINT OF IMPACT. |
M******k
发帖数: 27573 | 2 #1, "Failed to yield the right of way...." |
b******g
发帖数: 16 | 3 但是最后一句是双方都有相同的影响。 我是vehicle 2。 对方说全部是我的责任
【在 M******k 的大作中提到】
: #1, "Failed to yield the right of way...."
|
i****a
发帖数: 36252 | 4 who is "对方"?
don't talk to the driver, talk to his insurance company
police report is not bible, often insurance companies draw their own
conclusion and ignore police report
【在 b******g 的大作中提到】
: 但是最后一句是双方都有相同的影响。 我是vehicle 2。 对方说全部是我的责任
|
b***n
发帖数: 590 | 5 一个律师告诉我说，警察永远把自己认为的肇事车放在#1。
这样即使足够证据判定责任保险公司也能了解警察的倾向性。 |
n****n
发帖数: 281 | 6 这英文...
最后一句话的意思是，两辆车的碰撞点相近。如四楼所说，不要跟对方废话，直接找保
险公司，讲好事情经过就好。 |
k**t
发帖数: 1968 | 7 ...
【在 n****n 的大作中提到】
: 这英文...
: 最后一句话的意思是，两辆车的碰撞点相近。如四楼所说，不要跟对方废话，直接找保
: 险公司，讲好事情经过就好。
|
n********y
发帖数: 66 | 8 保险公司（state farm agent）也说了，
一般看 accident report 的时候， unit 1 Fault |
k**t
发帖数: 1968 | 9 百分之百VEHICLE #1的错.不用担心.没有任何保险公司会否认这样明显的错.
你只需要和保险公司打交道.
【在 b******g 的大作中提到】
: VEHICLE #2 WAS TRAVELING NORTH ON COBB PARKWAY IN THE CENTER TURN LANE.
: VEHICLE #1 WAS EXITING A PRIVATE DRIVE, WESTBOUND ONTO COBB PARKWAY.
: VEHICLE #1 FAILED TO YIELD TO RIGHT OF WAY TRAFFIC WHILE TURNING LEFT, AND
: STRUCK VEHICLE #2
: AT AN ANGLE IN THE LEFT REAR PASSENGER DOOR, WITH THE RIGHT FRONT PART OF
: THE BUMPER OF
: VEHICLE #1.
: VEHICLES SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE POINT OF IMPACT.
|
