k******a
发帖数: 389 | 1 现在有两辆，一辆是2010年的，53,386迈，LR2 价格是$17,500
另外一辆是2008年的，40,848迈，LR2，价格是$17,499，买哪一辆比较好？另外，路虎
容易坏吗？买这种车划算吗？比Lexus呢？ | w****2
发帖数: 936 | 2 Land Rovers have been the least reliable vehicles in US for many many years.
Have you ever wondered why used Land Rovers have so enticing prices? | w****2
发帖数: 936 | 3 Read this article:
http://dougdemuro.kinja.com/one-year-with-a-carmax-warranty-and
In essence, the LR cost more than two thousand to fix in one year.
If you can't afford a new LR, I don't think you are ready for that kind of
expense to keep the LR running.
One Year In A Carmax Range Rover
Miles: 12,162 (58,219 to 70,381)
Out-of-pocket cost: $582.21 (two oil changes, two wiper blades, two $50
warranty deductibles, one tire patch, one hole drilled in my taillight)
Carmax cost: $1,842.15 (new radiator, new lower control arm bushings, new
steering wheel memory module) | k******a
发帖数: 389 | | w****2
发帖数: 936 | 5 According to LR owners, only keep a LR with warranty.
Otherwise, get a non-luxury vehicle, much more reasonable with cost. | E*********o
发帖数: 5965 | 6 奔驰，二手没问题
【在 k******a 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢！唉，真头疼，到底应该选一辆什么样的车呢？
| k******a
发帖数: 389 | 7 真的吗？我去看看去。谢谢！
【在 E*********o 的大作中提到】
: 奔驰，二手没问题
| f*****h
发帖数: 4489 | 8 我有个同事2年前搞了辆二手路虎，基本每个月修一次，但人家坚持修，貌似现在越开
越好，人家说了，每个月总有那几天车旷特别好，他就是享受那几天
再说了，再怎么修也比新车便宜多了，就是麻烦
【在 k******a 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢！唉，真头疼，到底应该选一辆什么样的车呢？
| m*y
发帖数: 1778 | 9 靠普！
handy 的老美周末都在找project 做，车要不坏，他们周末都没法过了
这类车的forum 都有个sticky post：what do you do to your xxx today?
【在 f*****h 的大作中提到】
: 我有个同事2年前搞了辆二手路虎，基本每个月修一次，但人家坚持修，貌似现在越开
: 越好，人家说了，每个月总有那几天车旷特别好，他就是享受那几天
: 再说了，再怎么修也比新车便宜多了，就是麻烦
| b****e
发帖数: 287 | 10 lr2就算了,你到任何一个dealer那里,lr4, rr sports, rr基本没有现车,只有大量的
lr2还有极光,这车不好卖不是没有道理的.2.0T的发动机,又有路虎质量名声.价钱还不
低.
我自己开路虎,2013 lr4 v8 5.0. | C*******l
发帖数: 323 | 11 For most of us, best way to enjoy a Land Rover is to lease one. If you
really want to own one without warranty and you can't fix cars youself, be
ready to pay thousands for repair each year.
Used luxury SUVs: go for Benz, Audi, BMW. cheaper to repair, not much though
. |
|
