h******g
发帖数: 600 | 1 选个小SUV不好选啊。不想要CVT transmission的，安全比较好的，本来看中了RAV 4，
现在又发现不安全。只有CX-5和equinox能选了。US news 给出的CX-5 reliability不
好（2.5/5 https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/mazda/cx-5），也不知道为啥评分
这么差。是不是只能买equinox了。
ou probably don’t need the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) to
tell you that large SUVs are safer than small cars. Just look at a Smart
fortwo compared to a Chevy Suburban and imagine which passengers would
emerge better off after a crash.
On the other hand, car shoppers do need the IIHS to break down the safety
performance of each vehicle every model year. That’s the purpose IIHS crash
tests serve, and the best models of the bunch win Top Safety Pick+ awards.
(For 2018, advanced headlights also became mandatory for the highest safety
honor.)
Most SUVs did well in these tests. However, several models scored “poor” (
the lowest rating) in various crash tests for the 2018 model year. Here are
the five utility models that fared the worst.
1. Ford Explorer
2017 Ford Explorer
2018 Ford Explorer | Ford
Poor rating: Small overlap front, passenger side
There were a few trouble spots for the 2018 Ford Explorer. In the small
front overlap driver-side test, the IIHS gave it a “marginal” rating. The
headlights rated “poor.”
However, there was one crash test that Explorer also got the lowest rating:
the passenger side of the small overlap front. Testing notes described the
passenger space as “seriously compromised” with right hip injuries “
likely” in a high-speed crash.
2. Jeep Grand Cherokee
2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee | Jeep
Poor rating: Small overlap front, passenger side
The 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee also had its share of flaws. In the small front
overlap test, the driver’s side got a “marginal” rating while the
passenger side rated “poor.”
An IIHS blog on midsize SUV shortcomings added some alarming details. “
Measures from the dummy indicated that right leg injuries would be likely in
a crash of this severity and a head injury would be possible.”
3. Dodge Journey
View of gray 2017 Dodge Journey from front three quarter angle
2018 Dodge Journey | Dodge
Poor rating: Small overlap front, driver side
While most vehicles on this list struggled with the passenger-side crash
tests of the small overlap front variety, you’ll find the weakest part of
the 2018 Dodge Journey on the driver’s side. (Note: For this model, the
IIHS did not run tests on the passenger side.)
In that test, the IIHS described the driver’s space as “seriously
compromised,” with the crash-test dummy’s leg skin “gouged and torn by
the intruding parking brake pedal.”
4. Ford Escape
2018 Ford Escape | Ford
Poor rating: Small overlap front, passenger side
Ford’s compact SUV did not fare much better than the Blue Oval’s larger
model in the small overlap front test. While the driver’s side test
received an “acceptable” rating, the passenger’s side rated “poor.”
While injuries to the passenger’s right would be likely in a crash at high
speed, other areas of the body would remain safe, the IIHS found.
5. Toyota RAV4
2018 Toyota Rav4 Limited | Toyota
Poor rating: Small overlap front, passenger side
Finally, there was one oddity in the IIHS crash tests for crossovers and
SUVs. That came in the ratings for the 2018 RAV4. Though this model received
a Top Safety Pick award, it rated poorly in small overlap front test on the
passenger side.
For this year, the IIHS did not include the passenger side test in its
consideration for its lower safety award. (Top Safety Pick+ winners need an
“acceptable” or “good” rating here.)
By acing the rest of the tests, RAV4 made it out with an award. We’d bet
the 2019 model will improve upon this performance. | M****u
发帖数: 17708 | 2 婊子媒体的话不要
：选个小SUV不好选啊。不想要CVT transmission的，安全比较好的，本来看中了RAV 4
，现在又发现不安全。只有CX-5和equinox能选了。US news 给出的CX-5 reliability不
：好（2.5/5 https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/mazda/cx-5），也不知道为啥评
分这么差。是不是只能买equinox了。 | a***u
发帖数: 36 | 3 连接贴不上,去看刚顶上来的
普通家庭中小型suv 懒人选购小结
: 婊子媒体的话不要
: ：选个小SUV不好选啊。不想要CVT transmission的，安全比较好的，本来看中
了RAV 4
: ，现在又发现不安全。只有CX-5和equinox能选了。US news 给出的CX-5
reliability不
: ：好（2.5/5 https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/mazda/cx-5），也不知道
为啥评
: 分这么差。是不是只能买equinox了。
【在 M****u 的大作中提到】
: 婊子媒体的话不要
:
: ：选个小SUV不好选啊。不想要CVT transmission的，安全比较好的，本来看中了RAV 4
: ，现在又发现不安全。只有CX-5和equinox能选了。US news 给出的CX-5 reliability不
: ：好（2.5/5 https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/mazda/cx-5），也不知道为啥评
: 分这么差。是不是只能买equinox了。
| M*******A
发帖数: 1 | 4 RAV4 是销量第一的神车
可以放心购买
to
【在 h******g 的大作中提到】
: 选个小SUV不好选啊。不想要CVT transmission的，安全比较好的，本来看中了RAV 4，
: 现在又发现不安全。只有CX-5和equinox能选了。US news 给出的CX-5 reliability不
: 好（2.5/5 https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/mazda/cx-5），也不知道为啥评分
: 这么差。是不是只能买equinox了。
: ou probably don’t need the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) to
: tell you that large SUVs are safer than small cars. Just look at a Smart
: fortwo compared to a Chevy Suburban and imagine which passengers would
: emerge better off after a crash.
: On the other hand, car shoppers do need the IIHS to break down the safety
: performance of each vehicle every model year. That’s the purpose IIHS crash
| f******o
发帖数: 2469 | | v****r
发帖数: 11 | 6 那个reliability的我感觉不准
我买了半年的cx5，一万迈了啥事没有，当然略短，我觉得至少比equinox靠谱 | s**********h
发帖数: 436 | 7 I read the CR (November) in the local library a couple of days ago. The
projected reliability for CX-5 2019 is better than that for CRV. It actually
got the highest point. This suggests CX-5 2018, 2017 are not bad. | s**********h
发帖数: 436 | 8 I read the CR (November) in the local library a couple of days ago. The
projected reliability for CX-5 2019 is better than that for CRV. It actually
got the highest point. This suggests CX-5 2018, 2017 are not bad. |
|
