B*****t
发帖数: 3012 | 1 嗯，不知道这次准确性如何。去年好像全错的说orz
play-in game
Whitesox over Twins
ALDS
Redsox 2-3 Angels
Rays 3-1 Whitesox
NLDS
Brewers 3-2 Phillies
Cubs 3-1 Dodgers
ALCS
Rays 4-3 Angels
NLCS
Brewers 4-3 Cubs
WS
Rays 4-2 Brewers |
M******k
发帖数: 27573 | |
b*********n
发帖数: 1938 | 3 I am sure you wanna jinx halo and rays.
【在 B*****t 的大作中提到】
: 嗯，不知道这次准确性如何。去年好像全错的说orz
: play-in game
: Whitesox over Twins
: ALDS
: Redsox 2-3 Angels
: Rays 3-1 Whitesox
: NLDS
: Brewers 3-2 Phillies
: Cubs 3-1 Dodgers
: ALCS
|
B*****t
发帖数: 3012 | 4 I think any sensible analyst would favor Halo and Rays in the divisional
series.
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
: I am sure you wanna jinx halo and rays.
|
b*********n
发帖数: 1938 | 5 Lol, I am not analyst, but first time player to win a ws is too much a drama
for me.
【在 B*****t 的大作中提到】
: I think any sensible analyst would favor Halo and Rays in the divisional
: series.
|
B*****t
发帖数: 3012 | 6 I saw that happened twice (2001 and 2002) already, and also two teams that
had never won a ws title in my grandfather's life time finaly won (2004 and
2005), no longer any dramatic for me.
drama
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
: Lol, I am not analyst, but first time player to win a ws is too much a drama
: for me.
|
r**********e
发帖数: 2821 | 7 sheets有伤，靠CC一个也不一定行，去年CC不是被红袜爆得很惨？俺觉得WS rays对
cubs
【在 B*****t 的大作中提到】
: 嗯，不知道这次准确性如何。去年好像全错的说orz
: play-in game
: Whitesox over Twins
: ALDS
: Redsox 2-3 Angels
: Rays 3-1 Whitesox
: NLDS
: Brewers 3-2 Phillies
: Cubs 3-1 Dodgers
: ALCS
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 8 我看猴子还是有无数的先天缺陷。
【在 B*****t 的大作中提到】
: I think any sensible analyst would favor Halo and Rays in the divisional
: series.
|
j******o
发帖数: 82 | 9 Don't think the brew crew can get past DS.
【在 B*****t 的大作中提到】
: 嗯，不知道这次准确性如何。去年好像全错的说orz
: play-in game
: Whitesox over Twins
: ALDS
: Redsox 2-3 Angels
: Rays 3-1 Whitesox
: NLDS
: Brewers 3-2 Phillies
: Cubs 3-1 Dodgers
: ALCS
|
t********t
发帖数: 5415 | 10 brew过第一轮的机会还是有的，我倒是觉得TB过关的可能性成问题...还有红袜。天使
今年实在不好对付。重演一下04年吧。 |
G*******s
发帖数: 248 | |
