q**x
发帖数: 1636 | 1 nba rule:
There are two types of Flagrant Fouls, as follows:
Flagrant "1" (FFP1) - unnecessary contact committed by a player against an
opponent. The opposing team is awarded two (2) free throws and possession.
Flagrant "2" (FFP2) - unnecessary and excessive contact committed by a
player against an opponent. The opposing team is awarded two (2) free throws
and possession and the player committing the foul is automatically ejected.
wikipedia term:
In basketball, a flagrant foul is a serious personal foul. A foul is
considered flagrant when it involves excessive or violent contact that could
injure the fouled player. A flagrant foul may be unintentional or
purposeful; the latter type is simultaneously known as an "intentional foul"
in the NCAA. However, most intentional fouls are not considered "flagrant"
and are performed safely as a necessity for time management.
The NBA flagrant foul rule was enacted in the 1990s as an attempt to deter
contact which, in addition to being against the rules, puts an opponent's
safety and health at risk. According to the NBA rulebook, it applies to
contact that puts safety and health at risk.
The NBA defines two levels of flagrant fouls, typically referred to as "
Flagrant 1" and "Flagrant 2". Referees have discretion in determining which
level to call, but the primary distinction is that a Flagrant 2 results in
the immediate ejection of the offender. A player who receives two Flagrant 1
fouls in a single game is also ejected upon the second foul.
video here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSQn_NSJ4C8
the motion of full arm downward swing was not necessary at all. if green
wants to defense the ball, he would aim high to block the ball and would try
to keep his hand in front of the ball. instead, he did 1) full body contact
with James. 2)left arm push down/drag james 3) right arm swing hard
downward on james. you may argue that green was going for the ball. but, he
knew he would not be able to block the ball. so he gave the hard foul with
or without intention to hurt james. since he gave the hard foul, he takes
the risk of being called on flagrant foul. the refs did not rule the foul as
flagrant, so he got away without it. different views on the same foul are
common. i think it should be called flagrant foul. such
hard foul was very dangerous (side impact on player while in the air and
apparently face
slapping occurred) and could easily cause fighting or cause serious injuries
. imagine what would happen if it's curry instead of james and it's mosgov
instread of green. of course, mosgov would not foul like that for sure. |
|
