o******l 发帖数: 3125 | |
b******5 发帖数: 1415 | |
V**D 发帖数: 2869 | 3 有这个可能性,只要两个队商量好了就行。不过勇士下一场赢的几率应该有80%,除非
故意输掉。 |
M********t 发帖数: 5032 | 4 从历史上看应该不是防水啦
2000 Los Angeles Lakers (1)dagger 4–2 Indiana Pacers (1) [78]
2001 Los Angeles Lakers (2) 4–1 Philadelphia 76ers (1) [79]
2002 Los Angeles Lakers (3) 4–0 New Jersey Nets (1) [80]
2003 San Antonio Spurs (1)dagger 4–2 New Jersey Nets (2) [81]
2004 Los Angeles Lakers (2) 1–4 Detroit Pistons (3) [82]
2005 San Antonio Spurs (2) 4–3 Detroit Pistons (2) [83]
2006 Dallas Mavericks (4) 2–4 Miami Heat (2) [84]
2007 San Antonio Spurs (3) 4–0 Cleveland Cavaliers (2) [85]
2008 Los Angeles Lakers (1) 2–4 Boston Celtics (1)dagger [86]
2009 Los Angeles Lakers (1) 4–1 Orlando Magic (3) [87]
2010 Los Angeles Lakers (1) 4–3 Boston Celtics (4) [88]
2011 Dallas Mavericks (3) 4–2 Miami Heat (2) [89]
2012[f] Oklahoma City Thunder (2) 1–4 Miami Heat (2) [92]
2013 San Antonio Spurs (2) 3–4 Miami Heat (1)dagger [93]
2014 San Antonio Spurs (1)dagger 4–1 Miami Heat (2) [94]
【在 o******l 的大作中提到】 : 玩个刺激
|
r********3 发帖数: 306 | 5 哪能每次都放水啊
【在 M********t 的大作中提到】 : 从历史上看应该不是防水啦 : 2000 Los Angeles Lakers (1)dagger 4–2 Indiana Pacers (1) [78] : 2001 Los Angeles Lakers (2) 4–1 Philadelphia 76ers (1) [79] : 2002 Los Angeles Lakers (3) 4–0 New Jersey Nets (1) [80] : 2003 San Antonio Spurs (1)dagger 4–2 New Jersey Nets (2) [81] : 2004 Los Angeles Lakers (2) 1–4 Detroit Pistons (3) [82] : 2005 San Antonio Spurs (2) 4–3 Detroit Pistons (2) [83] : 2006 Dallas Mavericks (4) 2–4 Miami Heat (2) [84] : 2007 San Antonio Spurs (3) 4–0 Cleveland Cavaliers (2) [85] : 2008 Los Angeles Lakers (1) 2–4 Boston Celtics (1)dagger [86]
|
V**D 发帖数: 2869 | 6 的确如此,做假不能每次都做,那样的话连傻子都能看出来就没意思了。
通常来说两队相差越悬殊越好做假。像这次的勇士和骑士,勇士完全可以4:0横扫,这
样球迷和联盟都不希望。
【在 r********3 的大作中提到】 : 哪能每次都放水啊
|