b*********t 发帖数: 877 | 1 这个东西很难说,只有自己衡量着办。永远都是速度与质量的较量。不过要我说无论如何
不能投jbc。不是说jbc不好,而是被cell 送去review的东西,怎么着都是很有质量的,
投jbc太亏了。
我自己的故事说给你听:投了一个journal,被打回来。怕不行,转投另一个档次低点的
,结果打了6个月的持久站,来回拉锯4,5次,修改增加无数数据,终于接受。在长舒口气
的同时也不由得wonder:如果把后来这些都算上,兴许头一个高点档次的也搞定了?
所以呀,还是尽可能的投高点吧。其实要我说,一旦有review回来,而且不是直接句的,
接受的可能就已经很大了。comments不是每个都要满足的,只要满足一定数量,别的要有
理由的拒绝就可以了。
当然还有个考虑是你自己的打算。如果就想混个paper毕业无妨。如果这个paper对你以后
生涯很重要,还是越高越好。
good luck.
series
points
can
comments, | c**********r 发帖数: 109 | 2 I think citation is also important. That means speed is
important. The earlier you get published, the more
citation you got.
If that PNAS paper is from a competing group, definitely
move fast. In a hot area, speed is evry important. There
are good papers in JBC which have been cited many times.
if your boss is member of NAS, or he knows NAS members,
then you may consider PNAS (Track I or track III).
My boss usually try a high journal first, if rejected,
he will go to JBC directly. He said, the m |
|