由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - Economists, Scientists Debate Research Efficiency
相关主题
How science goes wrong -- From The Economist文章求助
Re: 谁有sequence cosmid的经验?求期刊“biotechniques”2015年7月份的纸质版,不胜感激!
Journal Listpaper help, thanks.
有介于Nature Biotech和两三分杂志的方法学杂志吗?问个realtime efficiency的问题
不想在实验室让老外占便宜Feeling very uncomfortable!
求一个好用的给genotyping PCR 的DNA isolation protocol寻找 Tips for your experiments 的出处
有两类人讨厌抱怨贴菜鸟请教 RNA-seq
paper help please!! 发bao zi!生物能源 利与弊
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: research话题: nature话题: efficiency话题: stephan话题: marty
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
g********0
发帖数: 6201
1
04/10/2012 Tanya Lewis
In a series of comments in Nature, economists suggest ways to reduce
financial inefficiency in academic research, but some researchers don’t
believe science should be managed like a business.
In today’s economic climate, academic institutions are seeking to maximize
their investment in research. While financial and productivity experts agree
that inefficiencies exist within the system, their suggestions for
improvement vary.
Last week, Nature published three commentaries (1–3) on research efficiency
by authors from academia and consulting.
Academic research, like other fields, could improve its efficiency,
consultants say. Source: Aaron Logan
In one of these articles, economist Paula Stephan from Georgia State
University argues that the problem lies with damaging incentives that do not
accurately reflect career prospects. Stephan brought up a familiar dilemma
for many young scientists: an ever-decreasing chance of obtaining a tenured
faculty or research position at an academic university. In her opinion,
research faculty hire postdoctoral researchers and graduate students as
cheap labor, while perpetuating false hopes of promising, fulfilling careers
in science.
“It’s like a pyramid scheme,” Stephan said. “The system doesn’t really
seem to worry about whether there are jobs for these people when they
graduate or when they leave a postdoctoral position. We’re producing these
people who are trained to do research... and then we seed them out.”
Geneticist Gholson Lyon from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York
agrees. “Too many people are being trained to become Ph.D.s in biomedical
research right now in America, without adequate notification that there are
very few job opportunities in academia,” he wrote in an email to
BioTechniques.
In another of the commentaries, academic consultant Marty Thomas from the
Swiss consulting firm Berinfor claimed academics waste time on
administrative duties that could be handled better by adopting models from
business.
“Efficiency is largely about saving time and effort, not reducing
expenditures,” wrote Marty in his article that was commissioned by Nature.
“Adapting concepts from private business will help academic institutions to
address inefficiencies and get faculty members back to teaching and
research.”
But here Lyon and other online commentators strongly disagreed. In a comment
on Marty’s article, Lyon wrote: “I am very surprised that Nature allowed
this advertisement to appear as a commentary in their pages.”
Physicist Igor Litvinyuk from Kansas State University dismissed the article
as well. He wrote that “scientific research is not a conveyor-belt output-
generating factory but a creative pursuit more akin to art than to business.

And in the final Nature comment, associate professor Pierre Azoulay from the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology proposed using a scientific approach
for evaluating research funding models themselves. Azoulay wrote that “this
vision will sound utopian to some,” but cited several examples of how such
studies might proceed.
“Experimenting on ourselves may well lay bare some shortcomings of the
scientific community,” he wrote.
References
1. Stephan, P. 2012. Research efficiency: Perverse incentives. Nature 484(
7392):29-31.
2. Marty, T. 2012. Research efficiency: Clean up the waste. Nature 484(7392)
:27-28.
3. Azoulay, P. 2012. Research efficiency: Turn the scientific method on
ourselves. Nature 484(7392):31-32.
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
生物能源 利与弊不想在实验室让老外占便宜
paper request求一个好用的给genotyping PCR 的DNA isolation protocol
Academia's Crooked Money zz有两类人讨厌抱怨贴
申请博后时的research proposal怎么写合适?paper help please!! 发bao zi!
How science goes wrong -- From The Economist文章求助
Re: 谁有sequence cosmid的经验?求期刊“biotechniques”2015年7月份的纸质版,不胜感激!
Journal Listpaper help, thanks.
有介于Nature Biotech和两三分杂志的方法学杂志吗?问个realtime efficiency的问题
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: research话题: nature话题: efficiency话题: stephan话题: marty