a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 1 IMPs
2 over 1 GF
S 9753
H K87
D KQ83
C K6
you deal and pass, you pd opens 1C, what's your call? | w****b
发帖数: 623 | 2 1S, and plan to raise pd's 1N response gently to 2N. What's the problem?
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: IMPs
: 2 over 1 GF
: S 9753
: H K87
: D KQ83
: C K6
: you deal and pass, you pd opens 1C, what's your call?
| c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 3 1S. I do play walsh style response.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: IMPs
: 2 over 1 GF
: S 9753
: H K87
: D KQ83
: C K6
: you deal and pass, you pd opens 1C, what's your call?
| g**********y
发帖数: 14569 | 4 I would think this way: if there is game for this hand,
it is 3NT or 4S. If there is no game, I hope to stop
at lowest level.
So I would bid 1D, if p has 4 spades, he still has 1S to show it.
【在 c****u 的大作中提到】
: 1S. I do play walsh style response.
| a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 5 You give the anwser which I think is right. But seems you still
need a better reason to choose 1D instead of 1S when you are
playing walsh style response.
when pd opens 1C, walsh style prefers a major response to
1D when they are in a 4-4, 4-5 or 4-6 distribution.
But why you want to do that?
The fundamental reason is that your hand
is not good enough to mention both of your suits legitimately
in a natural auction sequence. Thus you favor the majors.
Now you can see my point here. Because you ha
【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】
: I would think this way: if there is game for this hand,
: it is 3NT or 4S. If there is no game, I hope to stop
: at lowest level.
: So I would bid 1D, if p has 4 spades, he still has 1S to show it.
| c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 6 the back bone of walsh style response is that the system allows opener
to rebid 1NT without mentioning his major suits.
If you bid 1D, over pd's 1NT you would have no good rebid.
2S shows at least 4-5 distribution.
2C/2D are both sign off.
Actually now I play modified walsh response over 1C.
We bid 1D with 4-5 distribution and invitational hand, because
we have some gadget over 1NT rebid.
1C 1D
1NT:
now 2C relays to 2D, then responder can bid his 4 card major suit to show
a invitational hand.
2D
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: You give the anwser which I think is right. But seems you still
: need a better reason to choose 1D instead of 1S when you are
: playing walsh style response.
: when pd opens 1C, walsh style prefers a major response to
: 1D when they are in a 4-4, 4-5 or 4-6 distribution.
: But why you want to do that?
: The fundamental reason is that your hand
: is not good enough to mention both of your suits legitimately
: in a natural auction sequence. Thus you favor the majors.
: Now you can see my point here. Because you ha
| a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 7
That's good gadget, works well with New minor forcing.
BTW, what is 1C - 2D in your system?
First, I didn't say I want to reverse spade at all.
Second, if you mention 2 suits, in whatever order, unless you can do it both
in one level, pd will always assume you are in 5-4 distribution and the first
one is longer.
【在 c****u 的大作中提到】
: the back bone of walsh style response is that the system allows opener
: to rebid 1NT without mentioning his major suits.
: If you bid 1D, over pd's 1NT you would have no good rebid.
: 2S shows at least 4-5 distribution.
: 2C/2D are both sign off.
: Actually now I play modified walsh response over 1C.
: We bid 1D with 4-5 distribution and invitational hand, because
: we have some gadget over 1NT rebid.
: 1C 1D
: 1NT:
| c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 8 if you don't bid your spade, you may miss spade fit sometimes.
if you bid 1S, you can always rebid NT over pd's raise to show a weak
sp suit and suggestions to NT.
The logic is similiar to this one;
when you hold
Sxxx HKxx DQTx DATxx
if pd opens 1S, you can always raise him to 2S then later
rebid NT if possible to show your NT oriented hand.
but if you don't raise pd, you might not show your 3 card support
at all which can be critical sometimes if pd holds strong sp suit and
unbalanced hand.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
:
: That's good gadget, works well with New minor forcing.
: BTW, what is 1C - 2D in your system?
: First, I didn't say I want to reverse spade at all.
: Second, if you mention 2 suits, in whatever order, unless you can do it both
: in one level, pd will always assume you are in 5-4 distribution and the first
: one is longer.
| g**********y
发帖数: 14569 | 9 sigh, you guys play too complicated system for me. As a ameteur fan, I think I
will sign off :-)
Remember Zia said: all conventions should be waived except Stayman, if you
have that much time, why not enjoy woman and wine?
There are two trends in modern bidding which I saw: one is as delicate as
possible, one is as rough as possible. Guess I can only enjoy the latter one |
|
