x*o
发帖数: 10 | 1 实在拿不定主意。。请大家帮我出出主意把！谢谢！！ |
n******h
发帖数: 2482 | 2 Chicago. No part-time program will help your career much. At Chicago, at
least you will learn something.
【在 x*o 的大作中提到】
: 实在拿不定主意。。请大家帮我出出主意把！谢谢！！
|
z***g
发帖数: 538 | 3 Why cant you learn something in Kellogg? |
n******h
发帖数: 2482 | 4 Of course you can also learn at Kellogg. The thing is, the stuff taught at
Kellogg tend to be "softer". In my humble opinion, the soft skills can
hardly be learned and practiced without a full-time immersion. (I actually
think most of the soft skills can't be learned -- either you have it or
not, but that's a different story. Opinions vary. I won't dispute.)
【在 z***g 的大作中提到】
: Why cant you learn something in Kellogg?
|
N********o
发帖数: 203 | 5 Agreed.
And Booth's curriculum flexibility is second to none.
【在 n******h 的大作中提到】
: Of course you can also learn at Kellogg. The thing is, the stuff taught at
: Kellogg tend to be "softer". In my humble opinion, the soft skills can
: hardly be learned and practiced without a full-time immersion. (I actually
: think most of the soft skills can't be learned -- either you have it or
: not, but that's a different story. Opinions vary. I won't dispute.)
|
x*o
发帖数: 10 | 6 But Kellogg seems to have better career service for Part-time students: if
you pay tuition out of your own pocket, which is what I am going to do, you
can participate in on-campus recruiting with full-time's in your last year.
With Chicago, from what I understand, you MAY participate in OCR even if you
pay your tuition since you can't bid for interviews. Do I miss something
here? :) |
B**********r
发帖数: 544 | 7 I agree with narazeth and nyuchicago . Again, you may want to ask yourself
what your concentration would be. Booth is particularly strong in finance.
As to the part time program, Kellogg just started two years ago and it is a
more strict cohort program. The part time students have to attend same
classes at the same pace for the first year. You can not skip any quarter in
the first year，unless you want to wait for a whole year to join next year'
s cohorts.
Booth has way more flexible curriculum a |
x******i
发帖数: 477 | 8 这个问题我最近也一直在考虑，看来这里的人更喜欢BOOTH，不过我还是更加倾向于
KELLOGG。
砸这么多钱进去，不知道回报会怎么样，真是纠结啊。
【在 x*o 的大作中提到】
: 实在拿不定主意。。请大家帮我出出主意把！谢谢！！
|
n******h
发帖数: 2482 | 9 MBA is over-rated. Part-time program is even more so. Choose a program
based on fit rather than ROI because the ROI is more likely correlated to
individual rather than specific program.
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】
: 这个问题我最近也一直在考虑，看来这里的人更喜欢BOOTH，不过我还是更加倾向于
: KELLOGG。
: 砸这么多钱进去，不知道回报会怎么样，真是纠结啊。
|
k**u
发帖数: 698 | 10 if you want it so much to the point that you don't think about money anymore
, then go for it.
otherwise, you will have buyers remorse one way or another.
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】
: 这个问题我最近也一直在考虑，看来这里的人更喜欢BOOTH，不过我还是更加倾向于
: KELLOGG。
: 砸这么多钱进去，不知道回报会怎么样，真是纠结啊。
|
|
|
x******i
发帖数: 477 | 11 恩，最近研究了一下，发现要是想走management这个track的话，一个MBA的学位还是很
有帮助的。比如我现在做analytical consulting, 发现要是想去大公司做director of
analytics, 很多公司都是MBA preferred.
另外就是那些soft skills还是很重要的。虽然说很难学会，但是很多人还是需要开发
一下。
anymore
【在 k**u 的大作中提到】
: if you want it so much to the point that you don't think about money anymore
: , then go for it.
: otherwise, you will have buyers remorse one way or another.
|
x*o
发帖数: 10 | 12 谢谢nazareth,BountyHunter和各位的热心回答.决定去UC了:) |
l***o
发帖数: 57 | 13 恭喜！你是evening还是weekend program？ |
x*o
发帖数: 10 | |
d*****2
发帖数: 16 | 15 可能并不是很RELEVANT,但是芝加哥EVENING PROGRAM 曾出过两个大人物，高盛以前的
CEO，现在的NEW JERSEY州长。另外一个是LONG-TERM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 的FOUNDER.
【在 x*o 的大作中提到】
: evening. 楼上是同学吗？ :)
|
b***y
发帖数: 554 | 16 I think chinese over emphasize hard skills. i often see chinese vent their
anger on how their "weaker" indian colleagues got ahead in the work place.
what the chinese didn't understand is that while the indians may have weaker
hard skills, they are much stronger in soft skills.
as for Booth, I think the school is beefing up the soft side. I see quite a
few younger professors teaching some very interesting strategy/OB courses.
more interesting is that the indian:chinese ratio in these classes a
【在 n******h 的大作中提到】
: Of course you can also learn at Kellogg. The thing is, the stuff taught at
: Kellogg tend to be "softer". In my humble opinion, the soft skills can
: hardly be learned and practiced without a full-time immersion. (I actually
: think most of the soft skills can't be learned -- either you have it or
: not, but that's a different story. Opinions vary. I won't dispute.)
|
n******h
发帖数: 2482 | 17 On the contrary, I can't emphasize more on soft skills. I think, at the
end of the day, what makes you successful is your soft skills rather
than the hard ones.
However, I think Chinese tend to place too much weight on classroom
learning. I, for one, believe soft skills are best to be acquired from
our daily work and life, if those can ever be learned and acquired. Get
out of our office/home, play/social with people, take initiatives and
risks, and charge ourselves responsibilies and leadership
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: I think chinese over emphasize hard skills. i often see chinese vent their
: anger on how their "weaker" indian colleagues got ahead in the work place.
: what the chinese didn't understand is that while the indians may have weaker
: hard skills, they are much stronger in soft skills.
: as for Booth, I think the school is beefing up the soft side. I see quite a
: few younger professors teaching some very interesting strategy/OB courses.
: more interesting is that the indian:chinese ratio in these classes a
|
l***o
发帖数: 57 | 18 嗯，我也是9月入学。
【在 x*o 的大作中提到】
: evening. 楼上是同学吗？ :)
|
e****g
发帖数: 126 | 19 I lost to my Caucasian American colleague in the last promotion due to soft
skills. So, guys, move on and focus on that department. |
