c****t
发帖数: 36 | 1 sure, if you had that much time. Reading != understanding. | f*****r
发帖数: 229 | 2
And understanding != you can find new/exciting things.
The main problem is what is the most effecient way to get into one field/one
problem. From my experience, if you want to build some background knowledge,
it is better to read some jounal articles/Ph.D thesis. Then you can read some
latest conference/workshop papers to know the state of the art.
【在 c****t 的大作中提到】
: sure, if you had that much time. Reading != understanding.
| c****t
发帖数: 36 | 3 sure. Einstein said there are four shapes of "researchers";
1) triangle,
this type of researchers own solid backgound and very acute
sense of creativity. Newton, Einstein, Gauss are among this category.
For them, Reading --> Understanding --> creating something new.
2) diamand,
weak background but very acute creativity. Creating things without
much reading.
3) trapezia, solid background, but not very smart,
Reading --> Understanding --> sometimes create something.
But
【在 f*****r 的大作中提到】
:
: And understanding != you can find new/exciting things.
: The main problem is what is the most effecient way to get into one field/one
: problem. From my experience, if you want to build some background knowledge,
: it is better to read some jounal articles/Ph.D thesis. Then you can read some
: latest conference/workshop papers to know the state of the art.
| r********n
发帖数: 75 | 4 exactly, conf. papers just make u catching the cutting edge. that's all.
【在 f*****r 的大作中提到】
:
: And understanding != you can find new/exciting things.
: The main problem is what is the most effecient way to get into one field/one
: problem. From my experience, if you want to build some background knowledge,
: it is better to read some jounal articles/Ph.D thesis. Then you can read some
: latest conference/workshop papers to know the state of the art.
|
|
