p*****w 发帖数: 429 | | s***e 发帖数: 284 | 2 cvpr, eccv, ...
【在 p*****w 的大作中提到】 : iccv其他?呢 : 3x
| b***y 发帖数: 157 | 3 and some conf in other areas also accept vision papers like
ACM MM and SIGGRAPH
【在 s***e 的大作中提到】 : cvpr, eccv, ...
| l******e 发帖数: 153 | 4 NIPS also accept vision papers.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】 : and some conf in other areas also accept vision papers like : ACM MM and SIGGRAPH
| p*****w 发帖数: 429 | 5 thanks u all
for all, iccv is of the most importance, right?
【在 s***e 的大作中提到】 : cvpr, eccv, ...
| w****a 发帖数: 186 | 6 iccv and cvpr are equally important, in my opinion...
【在 p*****w 的大作中提到】 : thanks u all : for all, iccv is of the most importance, right?
| F**p 发帖数: 1046 | 7 maybe CVPR is hotter now. ICCV was used to very good.
【在 w****a 的大作中提到】 : iccv and cvpr are equally important, in my opinion...
| l******e 发帖数: 153 | 8 It's harder to say. CVPR gets higher and higher accept ratio ...
【在 F**p 的大作中提到】 : maybe CVPR is hotter now. ICCV was used to very good.
| b*******s 发帖数: 14 | 9 don't think so. if only consider computer vision,
ICCV and ECCV should be better than CVPR.
【在 F**p 的大作中提到】 : maybe CVPR is hotter now. ICCV was used to very good.
| c******m 发帖数: 98 | 10 cvpr好像正在扩招,质量大概会下降
iccv是single track吧,感觉好一点
Can not see you iccv presentation, 555
【在 w****a 的大作中提到】 : iccv and cvpr are equally important, in my opinion...
| l******e 发帖数: 153 | 11 My rank is
CVPR,ICCV > ECCV > BMVC,WACV > ACCV,ICASSP,ICIP,ICPR
【在 c******m 的大作中提到】 : cvpr好像正在扩招,质量大概会下降 : iccv是single track吧,感觉好一点 : Can not see you iccv presentation, 555
| r*****y 发帖数: 507 | 12 ICASSP is not CV conference bah. if ICASSP can be counted as CV conference,
then siggraph just has too many reasons to be called a CV conference too.
ICIP? image = vision?
【在 l******e 的大作中提到】 : My rank is : CVPR,ICCV > ECCV > BMVC,WACV > ACCV,ICASSP,ICIP,ICPR
| l******e 发帖数: 153 | 13 I know ICASSP is good for speech. However, for vision, as far as I know, there
is a lot of vision guys publish papers there, and it seems quite easy (accept
rate is around 50, if not above).
I think you are right, I should also include SIGGRAPH, and NIPS, it should be
like
CVPR,ICCV,SIGGRAPH,NIPS > ECCV > BMVC,WACV > ACCV,ICASSP,ICIP,ICPR
BTW, I don't think image=vision, they have different focus, though overlapped
quite some.
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】 : ICASSP is not CV conference bah. if ICASSP can be counted as CV conference, : then siggraph just has too many reasons to be called a CV conference too. : ICIP? image = vision?
| r*****y 发帖数: 507 | 14 hehe...
I have different opinions in terms of "top" definition.
Average quality of the accepted papers is one important factor, the other
important factor is the "visibility" of this conference for the right CIRCLE -
it means, "how many people in the circle will attend this conference and read
the proceeding".
ICASSP is one of the top and "comprehensive" conference in speech and signal
processing. (close to 2K submission, 1K accepted), the number of attendees is
huge too. I would say it is a hig
【在 l******e 的大作中提到】 : I know ICASSP is good for speech. However, for vision, as far as I know, there : is a lot of vision guys publish papers there, and it seems quite easy (accept : rate is around 50, if not above). : I think you are right, I should also include SIGGRAPH, and NIPS, it should be : like : CVPR,ICCV,SIGGRAPH,NIPS > ECCV > BMVC,WACV > ACCV,ICASSP,ICIP,ICPR : BTW, I don't think image=vision, they have different focus, though overlapped : quite some.
|
|