g******4
发帖数: 6339 | 1
.
---------------------------------
发信人: dynthia (能干就自己干,能省就一定省), 信区: Chicago
标 题: Re: 我对芝加哥公校的理解是否对？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 24 11:44:26 2011, 美东)
......
再说，这里评价学校好坏有统一考试，你知道标准么？６０分！你所谓的grad level.
就是说...孩子们一个班１００％的学生达到６０分，这个学校就是１０分...你那个
grad level是没有意义的，鬼子的标准非常之低 ... 我很清楚什么叫grad level.:)
[2] "For a decade, the Chicago Sun-Times has based its exclusive rankings of
public schools on average scores on state achievement tests, not on the
percent who meet state standards -- a measure that's come under criticism."
From "How we ranked the schools"
http://www.suntimes.com/news/education/1853681,how-schools-were
[3] Online, you will find another ranking:
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/IL/schoolrank.aspx
It said:
** The values used in the ISAT columns are % met standard. | g******4
发帖数: 6339 | | g******4
发帖数: 6339 | 3
.
On the following page, it says
% meeting or exceeding standards
http://www.greatschools.org/modperl/achievement/il/2237
---------------------------------------
虽然在州100名
---------------------------------
发信人: dynthia (能干就自己干,能省就一定省), 信区: Chicago
标 题: Re: 我对芝加哥公校的理解是否对？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 24 11:44:26 2011, 美东)
......
再说，这里评价学校好坏有统一考试，你知道标准么？６０分！你所谓的grad level.
就是说...孩子们一个班１００％的学生达到６０分，这个学校就是１０分...你那个
grad level是没有意义的，鬼子的标准非常之低 ... 我很清楚什么叫grad level.:)
of |
|
