N********n
发帖数: 13236 | 1 旧文重发，今天我查了一下：
google: "gun successfully defense" About 7,390,000 results (0.46 seconds)
google: "gun accidentally shoot" About 41,700,000 results (0.44 seconds) | N********n
发帖数: 13236 | | b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 3 你这个逻辑有问题. "gun successfully defense"是说明 Gun制止了犯罪, 防止了好人
受害.
"gun accidentally shoot" 是因为owner没有正常遵守枪支的安全使用而造成的.
正因为这样, 才需要学习正确的使用方法和保管方法.
除非能把黑枪都给禁了, 收了, 否则就是废话, 都是左煤的傻逼鸵鸟政策.
google的结果更说明一个问题, 左煤的导向问题. 没有人care gun defense case. 人
家只关心criminal被打伤, 不管多少人被criminal杀掉. | p***o
发帖数: 1252 | 4 说明google很烂，你用bing试试?
194,000,000 results vs. 27,400,000 results
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: 旧文重发，今天我查了一下：
: google: "gun successfully defense" About 7,390,000 results (0.46 seconds)
: google: "gun accidentally shoot" About 41,700,000 results (0.44 seconds)
| N********n
发帖数: 13236 | 5 好吧，摆个事实你说事实偏激，google出来的结果你说左煤印象，你真的应该回农村老
家，在这多鳖屈啊，言论都不自由的~~~~
【在 b*x 的大作中提到】
: 你这个逻辑有问题. "gun successfully defense"是说明 Gun制止了犯罪, 防止了好人
: 受害.
: "gun accidentally shoot" 是因为owner没有正常遵守枪支的安全使用而造成的.
: 正因为这样, 才需要学习正确的使用方法和保管方法.
: 除非能把黑枪都给禁了, 收了, 否则就是废话, 都是左煤的傻逼鸵鸟政策.
: google的结果更说明一个问题, 左煤的导向问题. 没有人care gun defense case. 人
: 家只关心criminal被打伤, 不管多少人被criminal杀掉.
| a***x
发帖数: 26368 | 6 hehe
)
【在 p***o 的大作中提到】
: 说明google很烂，你用bing试试?
: 194,000,000 results vs. 27,400,000 results
| b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 7 看到了??? 尼大叔?
【在 p***o 的大作中提到】
: 说明google很烂，你用bing试试?
: 194,000,000 results vs. 27,400,000 results
| N********n
发帖数: 13236 | 8 you are too late, bmx大叔说了，google严重偏左，它的数据我们不看了，所以拿
bing出来辩驳也没有必要了，大家都知道bing是最最中立的。。。
【在 p***o 的大作中提到】
: 说明google很烂，你用bing试试?
: 194,000,000 results vs. 27,400,000 results
| b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 9 In 2010, unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of 606 people.18
From 2005-2010, almost 3,800 people in the U.S. died from unintentional
shootings.19
Over 1,300 victims of unintentional shootings for the period 2005–2010 were
under 25 years of age.20
People of all age groups are significantly more likely to die from
unintentional firearm injuries when they live in states with more guns,
relative to states with fewer guns. On average, states with the highest gun
levels had nine times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to
states with the lowest gun levels.21
A federal government study of unintentional shootings found that 8% of such
shooting deaths resulted from shots fired by children under the age of six.
22
The U.S. General Accounting Office has estimated that 31% of unintentional
deaths caused by firearms might be prevented by the addition of two devices:
a child-proof safety lock (8%) and a loading indicator (23%).23
A. Guns save more lives than they take; prevent more injuries than they
inflict
* Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. Law-abiding citizens
use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times
every year -- or about 6,850 times a day. [1] This means that each year,
firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of
honest citizens than to take lives. [2]
* Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves
every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a
warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a
citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]
* As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against
sexual abuse.[4]
* Even anti-gun Clinton researchers concede that guns are used 1.5 million
times annually for self-defense. According to the Clinton Justice Department
, there are as many as 1.5 million cases of self-defense every year. The
National Institute of Justice published this figure in 1997 as part of "Guns
in America" -- a study which was authored by noted anti-gun criminologists
Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig.[5]
* Armed citizens kill more crooks than do the police. Citizens shoot and
kill at least twice as many criminals as police do every year (1,527 to 606)
.[6] And readers of Newsweek learned that "only 2 percent of civilian
shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal.
The 'error rate' for the police, however, was 11 percent, more than five
times as high."[7]
* Handguns are the weapon of choice for self-defense. Citizens use handguns
to protect themselves over 1.9 million times a year. [8] Many of these self-
defense handguns could be labeled as "Saturday Night Specials." | N********n
发帖数: 13236 | 10 发信人: Nietschean (尼大叔 之 真为你们的智商着急), 信区: Chicago
标 题: Re: 支持拥枪的来回答一下这个问题吧
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 5 14:10:50 2014, 美东)
you are too late, bmx大叔说了，google严重偏左，它的数据我们不看了，所以拿
bing出来辩驳也没有必要了，大家都知道bing是最最中立的。。。
任何你google出来的文章都是中立的，只有我的第一篇google统计是错的，跪安吧。。。
were
gun
to
【在 b*x 的大作中提到】
: In 2010, unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of 606 people.18
: From 2005-2010, almost 3,800 people in the U.S. died from unintentional
: shootings.19
: Over 1,300 victims of unintentional shootings for the period 2005–2010 were
: under 25 years of age.20
: People of all age groups are significantly more likely to die from
: unintentional firearm injuries when they live in states with more guns,
: relative to states with fewer guns. On average, states with the highest gun
: levels had nine times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to
: states with the lowest gun levels.21
| | | b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 11 我老来给你教育一下.
2010年, 枪支走火使得606死亡. 31%都是可以通过 a child-proof safety lock (8%)
and a loading indicator (23%)避免的.
一年有200,000女人因为有枪而没有被强奸. 因为有枪没有被杀死的没法统计, 以为,
罪犯不是被打死, 就是自己跑掉了. 或者给脑残律师无罪了, 或者给人满为患的监狱放
掉了.
尼大叔会数数了吧? | N********n
发帖数: 13236 | 12 http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Chicago/31888567.html
%)
,
【在 b*x 的大作中提到】
: 我老来给你教育一下.
: 2010年, 枪支走火使得606死亡. 31%都是可以通过 a child-proof safety lock (8%)
: and a loading indicator (23%)避免的.
: 一年有200,000女人因为有枪而没有被强奸. 因为有枪没有被杀死的没法统计, 以为,
: 罪犯不是被打死, 就是自己跑掉了. 或者给脑残律师无罪了, 或者给人满为患的监狱放
: 掉了.
: 尼大叔会数数了吧?
| b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 13 尼大叔真是文科生啊, google的搜索机制不懂的话, 就不要丢丑了.
google严重偏左? 我说过了?
google只是report有多少个链接, 媒体对很多东西的过滤才是重要的. 一个同样的TM的
case可以全世界都是链接, 自卫的新闻两个肤色都不说.
一个gun successfully defense都可以说成是自卫的人是criminal.
这样统计出来当然不对了, 你得把重复的报道去掉才行. | b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 14 尼大叔的理解力领教了, 看了google就知道了, 明明我说的左煤的偏向报道问题.
结果尼大叔粗暴的认为search engine google是左煤是元凶..
同样的是, 明明是黑枪和不正当使用枪支的问题, 结果尼大叔粗暴的认为是工具-枪的
问题. | m**********j
发帖数: 8645 | 15 不是支持不支持的问题。
而是国家机器有胆量没胆量把流散民间的枪械子弹都收上来的问题。
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: 旧文重发，今天我查了一下：
: google: "gun successfully defense" About 7,390,000 results (0.46 seconds)
: google: "gun accidentally shoot" About 41,700,000 results (0.44 seconds)
| h*********n
发帖数: 11319 | 16 尼大叔不是智力不行，而是脑子里有根弦不对，看问题颠三倒四的
我随便一google，就发现1000多个用枪自卫的案例
http://gunssavelives.net/incident-map/
这些案例，99.9%都没有上全国性的媒体。
安居乐业的守法公民（基本上都是白人大叔），每天老老实实上班，兢兢业业的照顾自
己家人。用保有
多年，熟能生巧的看家枪，合法击毙刚磕过药的黑天使。这样的故事，一丁点新闻价值
都没有。
吸毒，玩黑枪，逃学斗殴的Trayvon Martin被毙，他一个人贡献的google 搜索条目就
比这1000个
案子加起来还多。
seconds)
seconds)
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: 旧文重发，今天我查了一下：
: google: "gun successfully defense" About 7,390,000 results (0.46 seconds)
: google: "gun accidentally shoot" About 41,700,000 results (0.44 seconds)
| F*I
发帖数: 2896 | 17 尼大叔，这里有个问题就是gun accidentally shoot里多少是黑枪，也就是根本没有持
枪证的nigger们自己搞的？记得当年giants那个WR吗？在酒吧里朝自己jj搞了一枪？
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: 旧文重发，今天我查了一下：
: google: "gun successfully defense" About 7,390,000 results (0.46 seconds)
: google: "gun accidentally shoot" About 41,700,000 results (0.44 seconds)
| s********0
发帖数: 398 | 18 其实只说明了gun successfully defense这三个词一起用不常见.
举个例子:
car successfully arrive --> 13,000,000 results
car tragically crash --> 59,500,000 results
难道说明开车crash的比安全arrive的还多？
呵呵，那赶紧反对“拥车”吧，别管“拥枪”了。
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
: 旧文重发，今天我查了一下：
: google: "gun successfully defense" About 7,390,000 results (0.46 seconds)
: google: "gun accidentally shoot" About 41,700,000 results (0.44 seconds)
|
|
