m****s
发帖数: 18160 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Tue Mar 22 18:47:29 2011, 美东) 提到:
投诉人： Whiteclouds
投诉对象：我爱宝宝版主mitbbx及版副catdoudou
投诉标题：投诉我爱宝宝版主mitbbx及版副catdoudou大搞新闻网禁误导广大家长
投诉目标：罢免
投诉理由：
1. 事关每个人身心健康。你们凭什么封禁医药界的负面消息和非主流消息？
2. 关于疫苗利弊的讨论早已进入主流媒体了。你凭什么不让大家看到？
3. 药品（包括疫苗）近年屡有recall. 你凭什么禁止有关信息来误导家里有小宝宝的父母去盲目迷信药品质量？
4. 美加庸医遍地都是，医疗事故屡见不鲜。你凭什么制造版面气氛让家长对处方和诊断不过脑子的去盲信？
5. 凡事要听多方面意见，有点科学精神，你们动辄删贴封人缺乏领导版面的基本素质
6. 为人父母要首先自己要学会尊重不同意见，不然以后怎么教育好孩子？
7. 综上所述，建议罢免！
发信人: whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /), 信区: Parenting
标 题: CDC to Study Vaccines and Autism
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 22 18:44:33 2011, 美东)
CDC to Study Vaccines and Autism
HuffingtonPost.com
David Kirby
Author/Journalist
Posted: March 18, 2011 05:46 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wants to study autism as a
possible clinical outcome of immunization, as part of its newly adopted 5-
year research agenda for vaccine safety, the agency said on its website.
The CDC will also study mitochondrial dysfunction and the potential risk for
post-vaccine "neurological deterioration," and convene an expert panel on
the feasibility of studying health outcomes such as autism among vaccinated
and unvaccinated children.
The CDC plan adopts recommendations approved by the National Vaccine
Advisory Committee of the US Department of Health and Human Services. It
also comes one month after the federal government's leading autism body, the
Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), signaled a shift in
research priorities toward environmental triggers for autism, which the IACC
said could include toxins, biological agents and "adverse events following
immunization."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Immunization Safety Office
Scientific Agenda indentified the need to research "Neurodevelopmental
disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD)" as a possible clinical
outcome of vaccination.
The plan also seeks to deternine if the mercury-based preservative
thimerosal is associated with increased risk for "clinically important tics
or Tourette syndrome." The CDC cited one study (Thompson, NEJM, 2007), which
"found that increasing exposure to mercury from birth to age 7 months was
associated with motor and phonic tics in boys," and added that "an
association between exposure to thimerosal and tics was found in two earlier
studies (Andrews, Pediatrics, 2004; Verstraeten, Pediatrics, 2003)."
And, noting that the IACC federal autism panel "suggested several studies
including vaccinated versus unvaccinated children to determine if there are
differences in health outcomes," the CDC said it will convene an "external
expert committee to offer guidance on the feasibility of conducting such
studies and additional studies related to the immunization schedule,
including studies that may indicate if multiple vaccinations increase risk
for immune system disorders."
Meanwhile, the IACC has signaled a shift in research priorities into the
causes of autism, moving away from genetic studies in favor of investigating
the interaction between genes and environmental factors, which it said
could include toxins, biological agents and vaccines.
The IACC, among other things, helps direct millions of federal dollars into
autism research. Until now, the IACC's updated strategic plan noted, "the
majority of this funding (was) directed toward the identification of genetic
risk factors (with) less funding and attention toward environmental
research."
A number of environmental factors are now being researched, the IACC said,
adding that, "Recent studies suggest that factors such as parental age and
exposure to infections, toxins, and other biological agents may confer
environmental risk. These findings require further investigation."
As for vaccines, "Numerous epidemiological studies have found no
relationship between ASD and vaccines containing the mercury based
preservative thimerosal," the IACC noted. "These data, as well as subsequent
research, indicate that the link between autism and vaccines is unsupported
by the epidemiological research literature. However, the Institute of
Medicine report acknowledged that the existing population-based studies were
limited in their ability to detect small susceptible subpopulations that
could be more genetically vulnerable to environmental exposures."
There are several new research initiatives that the IACC has proposed,
including:
* Support at least three studies of special populations and
environmental risk factors for ASD in pregnancy and the early postnatal
period, such as toxic exposures and "adverse events following immunization (
such as fever and seizures), and mitochondrial impairment."
* Support at least three studies that focus on the role of epigenetics (
the environmental impact on genes) in the etiology of ASD.
* Initiate studies on at least 10 environmental factors identified in
the recommendations from the 2007 IOM report "Autism and the Environment:
Challenges and Opportunities for Research."
And, the IACC once again took note that:
Although the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) stressed that
the temporal occurrence of this regression and the immunization schedule is
not evidence of a causal relationship, regressive autism warrants further
research in rigorously defined subsets of ASD. In addition, the NVAC
recommended that studies assess whether adverse events following
immunization (e.g., fever and seizures) correlate with risk of ASD.
The strategic plan also renews the IACC's support for funding at least two
studies "to determine if there are subpopulations that are more susceptible
to environmental exposures (e.g., immune challenges related to infections,
vaccinations, or underlying autoimmune problems)."
Autism has become a "national health emergency," the IACC added.
That federal panel, along with the CDC's Immunization Safety Office, HHS's
National Vaccine Advisory Committee, and even the national Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP) now all support further research into a possible
association between autism and immunization.
For years, thousands of parents have been exhorting the government to study
adverse events following immunization such as fever and seizures, in
addition to mitochondrial impairment and "subpopulations that are more
susceptible to damage from infections, vaccines and autoimmune disorders."
Perhaps now they may finally get their wish.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Tue Mar 22 19:06:19 2011, 美东) 提到:
医药界唯利是图，大家有权知道负面消息，新生儿家长更无例外。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Tue Mar 22 21:12:40 2011, 美东) 提到:
投诉人： Whiteclouds
投诉对象：我爱宝宝版主mitbbx及版副catdoudou
投诉标题：投诉我爱宝宝版主mitbbx及版副catdoudou大搞新闻网禁误导广大家长
投诉目标：罢免
投诉理由：
1. 事关每个人身心健康。你们凭什么封禁医药界的负面消息和非主流消息？
2. 关于疫苗利弊的讨论早已进入主流媒体了。你凭什么不让大家看到？
3. 药品（包括疫苗）近年屡有recall. 你凭什么禁止有关信息来误导家里有小宝宝的父母去盲目迷信药品质量？
4. 美加庸医遍地都是，医疗事故屡见不鲜。你凭什么制造版面气氛让家长对处方和诊断不过脑子的去盲信？
5. 凡事要听多方面意见，有点科学精神，你们动辄删贴封人缺乏领导版面的基本素质
6. 为人父母要首先自己要学会尊重不同意见，不然以后怎么教育好孩子？
7. 综上所述，建议罢免！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Regina (猫宝宝) 于 (Wed Mar 23 02:10:53 2011, 美东) 提到:
钻风呢？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wayofflying (小破熊) 于 (Wed Mar 23 16:01:37 2011, 美东) 提到:
ding
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
honde (天地有正气，杂然赋流形) 于 (Wed Mar 23 17:35:04 2011, 美东) 提到:
附议，要求罢免外F mitbbx及catdoudou
的父母去盲目迷信药品质量？
诊断不过脑子的去盲信？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mitbbx (未知空间) 于 (Wed Mar 23 23:29:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
你的思想太偏激了把，药品recall你就不吃药了？奶粉recall你就不吃奶了？
谁当斑竹都会删除你的帖子。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Thu Mar 24 01:41:58 2011, 美东) 提到:
没看懂：你是说思想偏激的人贴的无论什么贴子都得被删掉？
什么不吃药不喝奶？你摘摘清楚谁不让病人适当吃药婴儿正常哺乳了？
原本到底怎么回事？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Thu Mar 24 04:52:00 2011, 美东) 提到:
办新版是个好主意可以慢慢考虑，但是NG版又不是版主板斧他们家的，凭什么就不去也
罢呢？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
catdoudou (豆豆猫) 于 (Thu Mar 24 11:01:53 2011, 美东) 提到:
歇着吧，您老。在宝宝版混，就要遵守宝宝版的规矩。不然，就请出门，拐弯儿，爱上
哪儿去上哪儿去。你说你换着马甲自己顶自己，自说自话，有意思么。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wayofflying (小破熊) 于 (Thu Mar 24 13:11:07 2011, 美东) 提到:
展开说说，我的帖子违反了什么规矩
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wayofflying (小破熊) 于 (Fri Mar 25 02:56:09 2011, 美东) 提到:
你还没有回答我的问题呢，究竟违反了哪条版规？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mitbbx (未知空间) 于 (Fri Mar 25 14:47:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
whiteclouds deserves to get blocked all mitbbs board
的父母去盲目迷信药品质量？
诊断不过脑子的去盲信？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
catdoudou (豆豆猫) 于 (Sat Mar 26 13:31:12 2011, 美东) 提到:
钻风，这个投诉到底处理不处理啊？？？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Sun Mar 27 02:52:27 2011, 美东) 提到:
对呀？对我们这些处理品们处理不处理呀？
我看钻风正偷着乐哪。。。。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mitbbs (未名空间) 于 (Thu Mar 31 04:51:30 2011, 美东) 提到:
查看过您的发文，版务组做出封禁处理也是按版规行事，详见宝宝版置顶帖版规中第一条
catdoudou Jul 16 ● 宝宝版版规——请大家自觉遵守
的父母去盲目迷信药品质量？
诊断不过脑子的去盲信？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Thu Mar 31 07:42:04 2011, 美东) 提到:
一条
"在宝宝版进行人身攻击的，种族歧视的，口出污言秽语的，扰乱版面秩序的，版务有权
一律封禁14天。的，"
Which one apply to the recent news article I posted there? if news report
about vaccine side effects is considered "扰乱版面秩序" then this "秩序"
deserves to be "扰乱".
Vaccine news is most important to NG and PT board, if they don't allow
these info to be posted there, something is wrong.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Thu Mar 31 07:54:59 2011, 美东) 提到:
------ 疫苗产业与洛克菲乐集团 -------
Jeffry John Aufderheide
vactruth.com
05/25/2010
http://vactruth.com/2010/05/25/vaccines-rockefeller-social-cont
PART I.
History books proclaim with absolute certainty that the pinnacle of public
health is defined by the polio vaccine program. Disease finally conquered by
science. The polio effort was a benchmark for the public to mentally accept
the concept “shots prevent disease.” However, hidden to most Americans
was an elaborate Public Relations scheme being carefully applied by
Rockefeller interests intended for social control.
Three central institutions where at the forefront of the polio war: the
Roosevelt Warm Springs Foundation, the National Foundation of Infantile
Paralysis or March of Dimes, and the Rockefeller Institute for Medical
Research. Through these foundations and organizations, polio transmogrified
into a major childhood disease. The massive public relations campaign
pushing the polio agenda targeting the American people was organized by Carl
Byoir, propagandist extraordinaire.
“When you set out to influence and persuade people to action, when the
campaign is tremendous, nation-wide [sic] in scope, don’t think that it
just happens; something has to be done to get millions of people to think
the thought you want them to think and then to get them to act on that
thought.”
-Carl Byoir
The PR campaign was intended to tug at the heart string of Americans by
using stars such as Sammy Davis Junior, Tennessee Ernie, Lucile Ball and
others. Why would the Rockefeller Institute, March of Dimes, and the
Roosevelt Warm Springs Foundation use someone as powerful and costly as Carl
Byoir simply to propagandize a childhood disease?
The big picture is that the Polio scare campaign would provide the
everlasting foundation for all the future vaccine programs. Is it by chance
the hypnotic words “life saving” and “effective” became synonymous with
the word “vaccine” after the polio campaign?
The motive of these organizations is perhaps the best understood by author
and researcher Lily E. Kay. She wrote about the motives of the Rockefeller
family in her book, “The Molecular Vision of Life.” On page 8 she wrote,
“The motivation behind the enormous investment in the new (“Science of Man
”) agenda was to develop the human sciences as a comprehensive explanatory
and applied framework for social control grounded in the natural, medical,
and social sciences.” (notation mine)
“Applied social control”, simply stated, is the misuse of any branch of
commerce, science, law, politics, or religion for compliance to an ulterior
motive held by those in power. Examples, such as the Rockefeller-backed
Federal Reserve Bank, is a perfect model of applied economic social control.
Lily Kay continues to elaborate, “With that agenda, the new biology (
originally named “psychobiology”) was erected on the bedrock of the
physical sciences in order to rigorously explain and eventually control the
fundamental mechanisms governing human behavior, placing a particularly
strong emphasis on (eugenics) heredity.” (notation on eugenics mine)
Ye shall know them by their fruits.
The success of the polio vaccine program was instrumental in implementing
what euphemistically has become known as the “Gold Standard” in allopathic
medicine: The American Childhood Vaccine Schedule. The vaccines listed
within this program are predicated on the sole belief that polio was
eradicated with a vaccine.
With strategically planned and executed applied social control systems as
the backdrop, what are some of the unintended consequences of adopting a
policy of “shots preventing disease?”
Firstly, parents are consistently, relentlessly, and blatantly lied to that
their children must be up to date on their vaccines in order to attend
school. Rarely are they informed that they have the option to apply for a
vaccine exemption (religious, medical or philosophical depending on the
state). However, new pharmaceutical-backed School Based Health Clinics are
being implemented around the country and parents may soon find that they no
longer have a choice in the matter.
Secondly, what about going to the pediatrician? The “Polio Question” is
unsheathed immediately by many “brave” pediatricians to pierce through any
parental doubt on vaccination. They constantly remind parents of the
graphical pictures with children in iron lungs; memories which are etched in
our collective consciousness. Parents are then scolded, “You don’t want
polio to come back, do you?” When many sincere parents continue to ask
questions the pediatrician cannot answer, they are encouraged to be promptly
slain.
Third, the “Polio Question” has become a potent weapon of social ridicule.
Parents attempting to offer “valid opinions”, empirical observations, and
anecdotal stories of their personal experiences with their vaccine injured
children have become the object of ridicule. They are marginalized as not “
adequately educated” by a bonafide, scientific medical institution. More
over, “rebellious parents” are regularly accused of child neglect and free
loading on society. They are maliciously threatened with the heavy hand of
Child Protective Services and the Judicial System. It matters not that a
majority of the parents and family members who are actively questioning
vaccines have observed first hand a life threatening reaction to vaccines.
Which brings us to the most egregious strategy of vaccine compliance:
persecuting families with vaccine injured children. In the United Kingdom it
is called Munchhausen by Proxy. In the United States it is called Shaken
Baby Syndrome (SBS). How many parents have had their children snatched away
by social services after an adverse reaction from a vaccine? Victimized
parents have likened this to organized kidnapping.
Wisdom can be found in the adage, “Those who cannot learn from history are
doomed to repeat it.” The new undercurrent in today’s society worships the
type of science and authority that brought us the polio vaccine. Thus,
understanding the motive of those in power is a primary principle.
After all, Dorthy didn’t discover who the “real” Wizard of Oz was until
she pulled back the curtain and found one man pulling the levers. Throwing
back the curtains of the Polio Vaccine Program, we will certainly see the
Rockefeller’s masquerading as Oz.
PART II.
You’re sweating.
You anticipate the knock on the door. It could come at any moment now and
your mind went blank. The doctor just left the room to get a vaccine for
your child. Ringing in your ears were the final words he spoke while leaving
, “Responsible parents vaccinate their children.”
Reservations are setting in. You remember a fellow mother who has an injured
child following their vaccinations. “Will this vaccine harm my child?”
you contemplate. Your family doesn’t get the flu vaccine because your
family eats relatively healthfully. You are second-guessing yourself,
justifying why you are at the doctor’s office. “But what about polio?”
you say. You scan your brain quickly for an answer, “Vaccines eradicated
polio, right?” Read on.
The year 1952 marked the worst polio epidemic in the United States – ever.
Thousands of children and adults contracted paralytic polio that year. Many
died. America demanded swift answers. In response to the outcry, the
National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (NFIP) and March of Dimes
launched a major public relations campaign. The answer was a vaccine.
There was a problem with the approach, though. The vaccine was touted as the
only answer to the “childhood crippler”. Put into perspective, their
stance did make logical sense. Many scientists had worked on a polio vaccine
for more than fifteen years with no fruitful solution.
This is where our story begins.
Secret Revealed
The secret may surprise you. In fact, if my hunches are correct, simply
reading this article may change your idea about vaccines for the rest of
your life. Here’s why.
The most prominent public figures and scientists researching and developing
the polio vaccine had one thing in common: The Rockefeller Institute. Before
I tell you some of their names, it may be useful to know about the
privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. Let me explain.
Many people understand the Rockefellers, along with corporate interests,
manipulate the United States money supply through the private Federal
Reserve Bank. The scam “The Fed” uses goes by many names: Fractional
Reserve Banking, The Fiat Money System or Ponzi Scheme.
They print the money out of thin air that is then lent to banks on interest.
The reason the scheme is so sinister is because there is no mathematical
way to repay the loan. Some believe the Federal Reserve Bank scam is the
Root Cause of our nation’s current financial ills.
Where’s the connection between the Rockefeller Family, Federal Reserve Bank
, and the polio vaccine? As I noted above, the common thread of this concept
is financial influence through Rockefeller coffers. This influence directly
extends to the National Foundation of Infantile Paralysis.
In 1955 Time Magazine wrote of the National Foundation for Infantile
Paralysis blowing the danger of polio out of proportion. But why would
anyone blow out of proportion something as serious as polio? Here is a
snippet from that article:
“All week the air was full of brickbats for Secretary Hobby and her
department, although President Eisenhower defended her (see NATIONAL AFFAIRS
). In retrospect, a good deal of the blame for the vaccine snafu also went
to the National foundation (for Infantile Paralysis), which, with years of
publicity, had built up the danger of polio out of all proportion to its
actual incidence, and had rushed into vaccinations this year with patently
insufficient preparation.” emphasis added
Medicine: Vaccine Snafu. Monday, May 30, 1955
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,866421-2,00.ht
As a researcher I had to force myself to rethink the implications. I asked
myself the question, “If the Rockefellers helped create the Federal Reserve
Bank and now manipulate our wealth, are they doing the same through
vaccines in order to manipulate our health?”
Delicious Poison
It’s a plausible question. In retrospect many health problems have been
attributed to the polio vaccine. For example, the cancer-causing Simian
Virus 40 (SV40), made in part from ground up monkey kidneys, contaminated
the original polio vaccine. Moreover, the polio vaccine manufactured by
Cutter Laboratories and Wyeth was actually causing paralysis!
Even the original cause of polio has been questioned. Documented evidence
shows neurotoxic pesticides, such as DDT, sprayed on crops and livestock as
a more likely cause of the polio epidemic. Even the vaccine literature
states many things that could cause symptoms indistinguishable from polio.
So where does knowing this information leave us?
There is enough information available to conclude that scientific
discoveries financially supported by the Rockefellers are used for the
purpose of social control. You’re going to discover one of the ways the
Rockefeller Institute “stacked the deck” in their favor.
After this article, I provide a brief summary of major players on the polio
scene. William Welch, Simon Flexner, Karl Landsteiner, Tom Rivers, Thomas
Francis, Henry Kumm, Jonas Salk, Albert Sabin, Hilary Koprowski, and Oveta
Culp Hobby were all tied to the Rockefellers in some fashion.
As you begin to consider the summaries as a whole, it will radically change
your perspective on vaccines and their purpose. Finally, you will know the
great depths of the Rockefeller Institution’s involvement pushing through a
vaccine as the only answer to the false-flag polio epidemic.
***
“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor
does truth become error because nobody sees it.” -Mahatma Gandhi
1. William Henry Welch
The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (RIMR) was created in 1901
through an endowment by the despised Oil Baron, John D. Rockefeller. William
Welch was selected to serve as chairman of the advisory medical board of
the RIMR. Several years later Welch also became a trustee to the Carnegie
Institution in 1906 and chairman of the executive committee in 1909 making
him the “…greatest Influential of medicine and biology and a leading
figure in the physical sciences as well.” [1]
http://web.archive.org/web/20031229063348/http://www.amphilsoc. (Susan and Archie with William Welch, looking at rabbits being used for poliomyelitis research, Summer 1887 Link: http://web.archive.org/web/20031229063348/http://www.amphilsoc.org/lib
mole/r/rivers.htm)
Welch had an archived photo at the American Philosophical Society’s website
, since taken down. The label appeared to infer Welch was involved in
poliomyelitis research dating as early as 1887.
If this is the case, Welch was experimenting with polio twenty years prior
to Simon Flexner officially doing so at the Rockefeller Institute. [2] The
plausibility of Welch having such knowledge is likely because it was two
years prior to his becoming “First Pathologist-in-Chief” at The Johns
Hopkins Hospital. [3]
To top it off, Welch was a member of the Skull and Bones Fraternity [3] at
Yale University and a member of the Board of Scientific Directors of the
Eugenics Record Office (ERO). [4] John Rockefeller dutifully donated sums of
$35 million and $65 million dollars respectively, the first two years of
the ERO’s existence. [5]
2. Simon Flexner
William Henry Welch chose Simon Flexner, his favorite pupil, as director of
the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Flexner joined Welch as a
trustee to the Carnegie Institution. [6]
Simon Flexner was able to adapt the polio virus to tissue in 1908, thus
replicating the discoveries of Karl Landsteiner, the “discoverer of polio”
. Historians note that research pertaining to poliomyelitis at the
Rockefeller Institute required prior approval from Mr. Flexner himself.
On March 9, 1911, Simon Flexner defended animal tests performed for
poliomyelitis research. He was quoted by The New York Times stating, “…we
have learned where it [polio] resides, how the disease is spread, how the
germ enters the body, the main sources from which infection is acquired, and
the available means of combatting [sic] the disease.” However he lamented
at the time, “… there is no specific remedy or cure.” [7]
Simon’s brother, Abraham, is best known as author of the notorious “
Flexner Report” that closed over half of the medical schools in this
country, which taught homeopathy.[8] Petro-chemically based remedies were
selected as the new medicine of choice, and precipitated the current
allopathic medical profession that promotes and administers vaccines. [9]
3. Karl Landsteiner
“[Landsteiner] also showed that the cause of poliomyelitis could be
transmitted to monkeys by injecting into them material prepared by grinding
up the spinal cords of children who had died from this disease, and, lacking
in Vienna monkeys for further experiments, he went to the Pasteur Institute
in Paris, where monkeys were available. His work there, together with that
independently done by Flexner and Lewis, laid the foundations of our
knowledge of the cause and immunology of poliomyelitis.” [10]
However, Karl Landsteiner is best known for discovering blood groups A, B,
and O. Simon Flexner recruited Landsteiner for further research at the
Rockefeller Institute.
4. Tom Rivers
Paul Offit writes in his book, The Cutter Incident, “[Tom Rivers] was head
of the laboratory for the study of viral diseases at the Rockefeller
Institute… By 1935 the Rockefeller Institute was the center for viral
research in the United States. Almost everyone who trained in the field of
virology trained in Thomas River’s laboratory.” [11]
Rivers helped develop the polio vaccine in addition to serving as chairman
of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis Committee of Scientific
Research. [12]
5. Thomas ‘Tommy’ Francis
Tom Francis graduated from Yale University in 1925. Shortly after graduation
, he joined the Rockefeller Institute. It is cited in his biographical
memoir that, “Among his prominent “private patients” were members of the
Rockefeller family, and for a time he almost rated as their private
physician.” [13]
Shortly after the end of World War II, Francis helped establish the School
of Public Health at the University of Michigan. Jonas Salk, the creator of
the Inactivated Polio Vaccine, learned from Francis how to formulate
vaccines.
Francis would then be in charge of determining if the Salk vaccine was “
safe and efficacious” during the polio vaccine trials. [14] 1,800,000
children participated in the “experiment,” and by Francis’ account, there
were amazingly no adverse reactions. [15]
By today’s standard, Francis evaluating his student’s vaccine is a blatant
and major conflict of interest. Why? If Salk’s vaccine proved to cause
paralysis or cancer, which it did, it would reflect poorly upon Francis’
reputation.
Switching gears to an almost seemingly unrelated topic… Dr. Richard Shope
of the Rockefeller University, and a good friend of Francis, discovered the
Cottontail Rabbit Papilloma Virus (CRPV), which is better known as the Shope
papilloma virus, a close cousin to the Human Papilloma Virus. [16]
To bring this discussion full circle to the polio vaccine, we look at a
presentation given at the 1954 Third International Poliomyelitis Conference.
In it, Nobel Prize winner John Enders demonstrated how the polio virus can
be grown on Human Papilloma Cells “affectionately” known as HeLa cells. [
17]
HeLa cells were mass produced by the National Foundation for Infantile
Paralysis at the Tuskegee Institute and eventually contaminated cell lines
used to produce the Salk vaccine. [18][19] This brings us back to Francis.
According to his memoir, “We (Peyton Rous and Thomas Francis) went to the
library where he (Rous) told me they had just found that a number of rabbits
they had kept for a long period after inoculation with the Shope papilloma
had developed genuine cancers.” [20] emphasis added
*Note: Vaccine inserts clearly state vaccines are not tested for causing
cancer (carcinogenesis).
6. Henry Kumm
Henry Kumm worked at the International Health Division of the Rockefeller
Foundation for Medical Research in 1928. During the Second World War, Kumm
experimented with larvicides containing DDT, a known neurotoxin often
related to polio-like symptoms, to control the spread of malaria in Italy. [
21] The pesticide DDT is often implicated as a likely cause of the polio
epidemic in the 1950s.
As touched upon in the article, livestock and crops were heavily sprayed
with DDT in the 1950s.
According to the Medical Archives at John Hopkins, “In 1951, he resigned
from the Rockefeller Foundation to accept a position as assistant director
of research at the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis. He conducted
field trials in the study of gamma globulin and the Salk vaccine and became
the director of research in 1954. Rejoining the Rockefeller Foundation in
1959, Kumm retired as an associate professor in 1964.” [22]
7. Jonas Salk
Jonas Salk is best known for creating the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV).
Thomas Francis [see #5] was Salk’s mentor and trained Jonas on how to
formulate vaccines. Salk tested the IPV on crippled and deformed children at
the D.T. Watson Home for Crippled Children. This paved the way for larger
trials. [23]
The larger vaccine trials were deemed a “success” by Thomas Francis after
testing the vaccine on millions of school children. Afterward, Salk was
proclaimed a National Hero through a carefully planned public relations
campaign sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company, a research / pharmaceutical
company founded in May 1876 by Colonel Eli Lilly.
Yet there were problems with the vaccine; they were causing polio. Salk’s
scientific “arch nemesis”, Albert Sabin, called Salk’s IPV vaccine “
dangerous” in congressional testimony as the vaccine was causing acute
flaccid paralysis. [24]
Both Albert Sabin and Jonas Salk were members of the National Foundation of
Infantile Paralysis Committee on Virus Research.
8. Albert Sabin
Albert went to work at the Rockefeller Institute from 1935 through 1939.
Albert Sabin created the Oral Polio Vaccine, which was tested on over tens
of millions in the USSR between 1955 through 1960 – the largest medical
experiment in world history. [25] Albert also tested his vaccine on federal
prisoners in Chillicothe, Ohio and on mentally “defective” children. [26]
In a cruel twist of irony, Sabin’s vaccine was causing paralysis; the very
same thing he had criticized Jonas Salk’s vaccine of doing. [27]
The Sabin and Salk feud appears to be a false “left/right” paradigm
solution as the vaccine schedule shifts from the Salk vaccine to the Sabin
vaccine several times. Sabin served on the Scientific Board for the National
Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.
One last interesting fact about Albert Sabin; is that his cousin was Saul
Krugman. [29] Krugman developed the Hepatitis B vaccine by experimenting on
children at the infamous Willowbrook State Institution.
According to Offit in the book The Cutter Incident, “In 1957 about sixty
retarded children between three and ten years of age were fed hepatitis
virus prepared from the feces of children known to have the disease (
Hepatitis B), and Krugman watched during the next few weeks as they
developed fever, nausea, vomiting, intolerance to food, jaundice (a
yellowing of the skin and eyes), and liver damage.” [30]
9. Hilary Koprowski
Hilary Koprowski, Polish-born virologist, found work with the Rockefeller
Foundation in Rio de Janeiro researching yellow fever. After World War II,
Koprowski worked for Lederle Laboratories where he was assigned to research
the poliovirus. His boss at Lederle was Herald Cox who was also trained at
the Rockefeller Institute. [31]
In 1950 Koprowski secretly tested his live-virus vaccine on special needs
children at Letchworth Village, a place for the “epileptic and feeble-
minded.” Oshinsky writes in Polio: An American Story, “Koprowski did not
tell Herald Cox about the test… The reason, Koprowski later admitted, was
the certainty of being turned down.” [32]
After testing the vaccine on children, Koprowski moved on to Africa to
further test his polio vaccine. A strong correlation exists between the
testing the Oral Polio Vaccine Koprowski developed and the appearance of HIV
/AIDS in Africa. [33]
10. Oveta Culp Hobby
Mrs. Hobby was the first U.S. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
from April 11, 1953 to 1955. Thomas Francis (see #5) announced the results
of the “successful” polio vaccine field trial on April 12, 1955 at 2:45 PM
, coincidentally the tenth anniversary of President Franklin Roosevelt’s
death. Mrs. Hobby pressured the licensing advisory committee to review over
two thousand pages of safety data in less than three hours. At 5:15 PM,
Oveta Culp Hobby granted permission for the polio vaccine to be manufactured
. [34]
The influence of her former top aide, Nelson A. Rockefeller, to make such a
hasty decision is unknown.
References:
William Henry Welch
[1] Fleming, D. (1954). William H. Welch and the Rise of Modern Medicine (
pp. 157-158). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
[2] Archive.org. Thomas M. Rivers Papers. Retrieved August 16th, 2010, from http://web.archive.org/web/20031229063348/http://www.amphilsoc.org/library/mole/r/rivers.htm
[3] John Hopkins Medical Institutions. Chronology of the Life of William
Henry Welch. Retrieved August 16th, 2010 from http://www.medicalarchives.jhmi.edu/welch/chronology.htm
[4] Black, E. (2003). War Against the Weak (pp. 89). New York: Four Walls
Eight Windows.
[5] Ibid., pp. 93.
Simon Flexner
[6] Langland, J. (1911). Chicago Daily News Almanac Year Book for 1912 (pp.
127). The Dallas News Company.
[7] New York Times. Near To A Cure For Infantile Paralysis. Retrieved August
16th , 2010, from http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9C00EFDD1439E333A2575AC0A9659C946096D6CF
[8] The Carnegie Foundation. Medical Education In the United States and
Canada: A Report To the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Retrieved August 16th, 2010 from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/sites/default/files/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf
[9] Griffin, G. E. He Who Pays the Piper – Creation of the Modern Medical (
Drug) Establishment. Retrieved August 16th, 2010 from http://www.sntp.net/fda/piper_griffin.htm
Karl Landsteiner
[10] Nobel Prize in Medicine. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1930
Thomas Rivers
[11] Offit, P. (2005). The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio
Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis (pp. 16). New Haven and London:
Yale University Press.
[12] Wilson, D. (2009). Polio (pp. 152). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Thomas Francis
[13] Paul, J. (1974). A Biographical Memoir: Thomas Francis, Jr. – 1900-
1969 (pp. 63). Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved
August 17th, 2010 from http://books.nap.edu/html/biomems/tfrancis.pdf
[14] T. Francis, Jr., et al., Evaluation of the 1954 Field Trial of
Poliomyelitis Vaccine; Final Report (Ann Arbor, Mich., Edwards Brothers, Inc
., 1957), p. xxvii.
[15] Paul, J. (1974). A Biographical Memoir: Thomas Francis, Jr. – 1900-
1969 (pp. 79). Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved
August 17th, 2010 from http://books.nap.edu/html/biomems/tfrancis.pdf
[16] Ibid., pp 85.
[17] Enders, J. Papers and Discussions Presented at the Third International
Poliomyelitis Conference: Developments in Tissue Culture., (pp. 221).
Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.
[18] Brown, R., et. al. The Mass Production and Distribution of HeLa Cells
at Tuskegee Institute, 1953-55. J Hist Med Allied Sci.1983; 38: 415-431.
[19] Nelson-Rees, W.A. Responsibility for truth in research. Philos Trans R
Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 June 29; 356(1410): 849-851.
[20] Paul, J. (1974). A Biographical Memoir: Thomas Francis, Jr. – 1900-
1969 (pp. 79). Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved
August 17th, 2010 from http://books.nap.edu/html/biomems/tfrancis.pdf
Henry Kumm
[21] Snowden, F.M. (2006). The Conquest of Malaria: Italy, 1900-1962, (pp.
200). Frederick W. Hilles Publication Fund of Yale University.
[22] Medical Archives of The John Hopkins Medical Institutions. Henry W.
Kumm Collection. Retrieved August 17th , 2010 from http://www.medicalarchives.jhmi.edu/papers/kumm.html
Jonas Salk
[23] Offit, P. (2005). The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio
Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis (pp. 35). New Haven and London:
Yale University Press.
[24] Dangerous Virus: Albert Sabin, testifying at hearings before the
Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives,
Eighty-Fourth Congress, First Session, May 27, 1955.
Albert Sabin
[25] Oshinsky, D.M. (2005). Polio: An American Story (pp. 245). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
[26] Ibid.
[27] Langmuir, A. Report of Special Advisory Committee on Oral Poliomyelitis
Vaccines to the Surgeon General of Public Health Service. JAMA. 1964;
190(1):49-51.
[28] Henderson, D.A., et. al. Paralytic Disease Associated With Oral Polio
Vaccines. JAMA. 1964;190(1):41-48.
[29] Frederick L. Ehrman Medical Library Archives Exhibit. Saul Krugman M.D.
, Physician, Scientist, Teacher 1911-1995. Retrieved August 17th 2010 from http://library.med.nyu.edu/library/eresources/featuredcollections/krugman/pdf/SK0015.pdf
[30] Offit, P. (2005). The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio
Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis (pp. 37). New Haven and London:
Yale University Press.
Hilary Koprowski
[31] Oshinsky, D.M. (2005). Polio: An American Story (pp. 135). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
[32] Ibid.
[33] Hooper, E. Experimental oral polio vaccines and acquired immune
deficiency syndrome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 29;356(
1410):803-14.
Ovetta Culp Hobby
[34] Offit, P. (2005). The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio
Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis (pp. 61-63). New Haven and London:
Yale University Press.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Mon Apr 4 04:32:21 2011, 美东) 提到:
Re
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Mon Apr 4 04:32:38 2011, 美东) 提到:
Re
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Tue Apr 5 21:54:12 2011, 美东) 提到:
re
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Thu Apr 7 07:04:43 2011, 美东) 提到:
RE!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /) 于 (Tue May 24 14:34:03 2011, 美东) 提到:
re
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
groundhog09 (衰哥) 于 (Wed May 25 20:49:54 2011, 美东) 提到:
妈的，mitbbs还有没有言论自由了？
上了十几年了，现在变成这样了？？？？
以后这样，老子不上了。
的父母去盲目迷信药品质量？
诊断不过脑子的去盲信？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
freshseair (小猪lulu) 于 (Thu May 26 08:19:37 2011, 美东) 提到:
这叫什么逻辑？告诉有召回的药品就是不让吃药了？告知风险怎么偏激了？看不出你的
逻辑。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
freshseair (小猪lulu) 于 (Thu May 26 08:26:08 2011, 美东) 提到:
你一说话就暴露你的品性了。这种人，有点小权就不知道怎么使了，把宝宝版当自个家
的了。
豆豆猫这副嘴脸让人想起小兵张嘎里的胖翻译了。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
littletom (小汤姆) 于 (Thu May 26 12:33:42 2011, 美东) 提到:
我不认识fresheair, 我也不是她的马甲, 我来顶一顶fresheair.
大家论坛随便逛, 爱去哪里发言就去哪里发言,宝宝版不是catdoudou的私人论坛. |
|
