c*****p 发帖数: 51 | 1 USCIS 5月的EB-demanddata与485 Pending 严重不符合!!
根据USICS公布的485pendingdata Based on 03/08/2010,USCIS 5月的EB-demanddata与
485 Pending 严重不符合!!
请参考附件! |
W*********r 发帖数: 989 | 2 I think that is because EB3C can not have earlier PD than ROW. It is doomed
that visas will be wasted. If possible, change to EB2 is the best way to do
now. |
t*********l 发帖数: 778 | 3 I never understand this point:
"EB3C can not have earlier PD than ROW"
can anyone explain it ? |
d*****z 发帖数: 487 | 4 我想是这样:如果ROW有排期,那么任何一个国家的排期不能晚于ROW的排期。似乎以前
在哪里看到过这个解释。
【在 t*********l 的大作中提到】 : I never understand this point: : "EB3C can not have earlier PD than ROW" : can anyone explain it ?
|
t*********l 发帖数: 778 | 5 如果ROW有排期,那么任何一个国家的排期不能晚于ROW的排期。
不明白为什么要这么规定 |
s**g 发帖数: 709 | 6 That means the 485 case will be approved with a PD order.
It EB3C's cut-off date is later than ROW, it means some EB3C with later PD get approved than
ROW with older PD. |
t*********l 发帖数: 778 | 7 "it means the 485 case will be approved with a PD order"
假设EB3C 2003年之前一个人也没有了, 但是EB3row 2003年之前 还有6000人,那EB3C
只能等着EB3row 那6000人全部批完才能一起动?
如果EB3C处于等待状态,EB3C的名额2600多都浪费了? 还是拿去分给EB3row了? |
W*********r 发帖数: 989 | 8 I think it should horizontally spillover to EB3ROW. It also means wasted in
our viewpoint.
EB3C
【在 t*********l 的大作中提到】 : "it means the 485 case will be approved with a PD order" : 假设EB3C 2003年之前一个人也没有了, 但是EB3row 2003年之前 还有6000人,那EB3C : 只能等着EB3row 那6000人全部批完才能一起动? : 如果EB3C处于等待状态,EB3C的名额2600多都浪费了? 还是拿去分给EB3row了?
|
L*****a 发帖数: 3080 | 9
in
想骂人了,哪个蠢材制定的规则?没逻辑没人性。谁能保证每个国家每年EB3申请人都
差不多。
如果CP+AOS每年2600名额不浪费,又没有这个该死的rule, prior to 2010 的EB3C
inventory应该在3/4年后就cleared了。
【在 W*********r 的大作中提到】 : I think it should horizontally spillover to EB3ROW. It also means wasted in : our viewpoint. : : EB3C
|