R****r 发帖数: 623 | 1 咱们和OSB的通信,一封信只针对一个问题,让他没有打太极的与地,当务之急是让他
把今年的quota用完。我没见到他回答说明过:
On what ground did you set different consumption rates for quota uage
between two overscribed countries?
Obivously Indians have used up their quota already, but Chinese still
consume our own quota at very slow rate. |
f*******8 发帖数: 1430 | 2 他当然要把大量的名额给印度。因为印度人有很多人在port to EB2. 这样就增加了政
府的收入,还有移民律师的收入。
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 咱们和OSB的通信,一封信只针对一个问题,让他没有打太极的与地,当务之急是让他 : 把今年的quota用完。我没见到他回答说明过: : On what ground did you set different consumption rates for quota uage : between two overscribed countries? : Obivously Indians have used up their quota already, but Chinese still : consume our own quota at very slow rate.
|
S*****X 发帖数: 1129 | 3 No matter what is the reason,
我的意见--抗争总比坐以待毙强, 就这么简单。。。
抗争还有一些希望, 有可能要到一些名额, 如果等着人家切割, 好了您哪, 那就是
汤都喝不到, 还让印度和O 觉得是应该的。。。
您知道印度人闹的多凶么。。。很多中国人对自己同胞内斗, 那叫一个胆大, 心细,
够狠, 对外那叫一个软弱, 回缩, 我都无语了。。。
【在 f*******8 的大作中提到】 : 他当然要把大量的名额给印度。因为印度人有很多人在port to EB2. 这样就增加了政 : 府的收入,还有移民律师的收入。
|
Q*K 发帖数: 3464 | 4 Ok, this sounds good. We'll only ask a key question directly and no more
garbage words.
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 咱们和OSB的通信,一封信只针对一个问题,让他没有打太极的与地,当务之急是让他 : 把今年的quota用完。我没见到他回答说明过: : On what ground did you set different consumption rates for quota uage : between two overscribed countries? : Obivously Indians have used up their quota already, but Chinese still : consume our own quota at very slow rate.
|
l****l 发帖数: 3394 | 5 thanks QuK, please have us updated. |
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 6 Anyways, thanks for your guys great efforts. I really appreciate it!
【在 Q*K 的大作中提到】 : Ok, this sounds good. We'll only ask a key question directly and no more : garbage words.
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 7 开门见山, 少说废话。
Be polite but be assertive.
Thanks!!!
more
【在 Q*K 的大作中提到】 : Ok, this sounds good. We'll only ask a key question directly and no more : garbage words.
|
c****t 发帖数: 19049 | 8 Be polite but be assertive - 这是要点
【在 f*******7 的大作中提到】 : 开门见山, 少说废话。 : Be polite but be assertive. : Thanks!!! : : more
|
s****l 发帖数: 16457 | 9 support
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 咱们和OSB的通信,一封信只针对一个问题,让他没有打太极的与地,当务之急是让他 : 把今年的quota用完。我没见到他回答说明过: : On what ground did you set different consumption rates for quota uage : between two overscribed countries? : Obivously Indians have used up their quota already, but Chinese still : consume our own quota at very slow rate.
|
g********n 发帖数: 4054 | |
|
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 11 Also please proofread your email to O. No offense, but the posted email is
full of errors, for example:
"There is only some minor details"... |
D*****0 发帖数: 196 | 12 说得对极了,简单明了,切中要点,每次只问一个问题,不要有多余的废话。 |
C******e 发帖数: 1850 | 13 大傻这几年一直用这个伎俩,让三哥上来就大吃大喝,很快就吃完自己碗里的,然后先
动筷子捞锅里的剩余名额,老中呢,每次给一小调羹,最后眼看着人家捞,心里骂娘,
没办法呀,你自己碗里还有啊,你不能去锅里捞。他已经是轻车熟路了,我就搞不懂,
他这样搞有没有啥个子法律依据?我们应该揪住这个问题让他解释清楚。 |
j****l 发帖数: 1440 | 14 Of course, why should NIU treat him polite.
This asshole only respect who can kick his ass!
【在 C******e 的大作中提到】 : 大傻这几年一直用这个伎俩,让三哥上来就大吃大喝,很快就吃完自己碗里的,然后先 : 动筷子捞锅里的剩余名额,老中呢,每次给一小调羹,最后眼看着人家捞,心里骂娘, : 没办法呀,你自己碗里还有啊,你不能去锅里捞。他已经是轻车熟路了,我就搞不懂, : 他这样搞有没有啥个子法律依据?我们应该揪住这个问题让他解释清楚。
|
S*L 发帖数: 1746 | 15 There is nothing wrong treating him politely.
Good manners are the most widely accepted form
of hypocrisy.
But we need to be firm in our position.
【在 j****l 的大作中提到】 : Of course, why should NIU treat him polite. : This asshole only respect who can kick his ass!
|
zg 发帖数: 113 | 16 I strongly strongly second this. We can not fight SO by PD. But the
different treatment of EB2I and EB2C is most unfair, and he never explains why he did it that way. |
a******e 发帖数: 996 | 17 我有个问题不明白。假设O让我们5月吃完自己的陪额,假设EB2C VB到7/22,EB2I VB到
5/1。然后6
月份开始吃SO。可是这样EB2C 和 EB2I就要有相同的 cut off date, 假设6月EB2C
和EB2I都
是6/1。那我们反而倒退了,这个会不会发生?如果有可能,这样对我们有什么好出
吗?
也许我的理解是错的,所以请明白的人给解释一下。
explains why he did it that way.
【在 zg 的大作中提到】 : I strongly strongly second this. We can not fight SO by PD. But the : different treatment of EB2I and EB2C is most unfair, and he never explains why he did it that way.
|
zg 发帖数: 113 | 18 After C in 2007/7, the PD had ever moved to 08/2006 sometime in 2008.
If we can use all quote to move EB2C to 9/22/06 in May, some EB2C whose PD
in between 07/22/2006 and 9/22/06 will have chance to submit 485. More EB2C
will compete with EB2I for SO in June to September.
Also, if EB2C moves to 9/22/06 in May, EB2C of PD before 9/22/06 will have
more chance to get approved, comparing to being submerged by huger number of
EB2I in June or later.
EB2C
【在 a******e 的大作中提到】 : 我有个问题不明白。假设O让我们5月吃完自己的陪额,假设EB2C VB到7/22,EB2I VB到 : 5/1。然后6 : 月份开始吃SO。可是这样EB2C 和 EB2I就要有相同的 cut off date, 假设6月EB2C : 和EB2I都 : 是6/1。那我们反而倒退了,这个会不会发生?如果有可能,这样对我们有什么好出 : 吗? : 也许我的理解是错的,所以请明白的人给解释一下。 : : explains why he did it that way.
|
p*******e 发帖数: 986 | 19 My revision to O (highlight: difference, differently):
After carefully reviewing what you stated in your previous message, we still
have two questions and please make the answers clear to us.
1. China and India right now are both all over subscribed and subject to 7%
per country cap. But why has India reached its cap earlier than China? Which
rule or document is the reason that causes this difference, or is there any
particular reason for the difference?
2. If you've already made the decision to let India alone enjoy the
spillovers in May, what is your next step to compensate the China Eb2 group?
Both the EB2 groups have the same right. However, there is a chance that
they would be treated differently in May. |
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 20 别写第二条,又让那厮找到太极用武之地了。绝对有搬出PD优先之类搪塞咱,根本不回
答第一条。。。
still
%
Which
any
group?
【在 p*******e 的大作中提到】 : My revision to O (highlight: difference, differently): : After carefully reviewing what you stated in your previous message, we still : have two questions and please make the answers clear to us. : 1. China and India right now are both all over subscribed and subject to 7% : per country cap. But why has India reached its cap earlier than China? Which : rule or document is the reason that causes this difference, or is there any : particular reason for the difference? : 2. If you've already made the decision to let India alone enjoy the : spillovers in May, what is your next step to compensate the China Eb2 group? : Both the EB2 groups have the same right. However, there is a chance that
|