d******8
发帖数: 1972 | |
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 2 估计今年的剩余名额不少，下月可能就会到2006年底。虽然自己的排期还不到，还是很兴奋，希望大家都能早点拿到绿卡。 |
j***y
发帖数: 1640 | 3 哦也！这应该是多少S/O 啊， 烙印前进 3个半月 大概要 6000 个， 中国前进2个半月要2000个， 我靠总共 8000个名额。 8000 x4(6,7,8,9月) = 32000
看来3万个s/o 千真万确啊！ |
S*p
发帖数: 1483 | |
j***y
发帖数: 1640 | 5 oops! 都怪自己被憋坏了，来美10 年，可悲
0
【在 S*p 的大作中提到】
: 多了个0，变成32万了，呵呵
|
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 6 我也一样，马上就10年了，只恨自己动手太晚。
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: oops! 都怪自己被憋坏了，来美10 年，可悲
:
: 0
|
j***y
发帖数: 1640 | |
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 8 FRom http://www.qesehmk.org/forums/showthread.php?4-EB2-Predictions-(Rather-Calculations)/page70
EB2-C the same?
I think that EB2-C must now share the same Cut Off Date as EB2-I in June.
The movement to Oct 15 2006 means they will exceed the base 2,803 allocation
.
Spec,
EB2C may have inched forward than 15OCT2006 since more spillover numbers
will be applied in the coming months.
Veni,
My understanding is that once both Countries start using the spillover, that
they have to share the same Cut Off Date, since visas must be allocated on
a strictly earliest PD basis.
This was how CO explained the reason they didn't in May, since China was
still using their own initial allocation.
Note that a cut-off date imposed to control the use of “otherwise unused”
numbers could be earlier than the cut-off date established to control number
use under a quarterly or per-country annual limit. For example, at present
the India Employment Second preference cut-off date governs the use of
numbers under Section 202(a)(5), India having reached its Employment Second
annual limit; the China Employment Second preference cut-off date governs
number use under the quarterly limit, since China has not yet reached its
Employment Second annual limit.
The way I read that is that China will now also begin to use visas under
Section 202(a)(5), so the Cut Off Dates will be the same.
I could be wrong. |
m****2
发帖数: 128 | 9 A3 's may be wrong
大前进。
【在 d******8 的大作中提到】
: http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
: 应该不是错误，如果正确的话，我们中国至少应该平齐和更超前，看来排期确实是要大前进。
|
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 10 确实按常理， 我们应该比A３快很多，可是照O的理解，可能我们只能绑在一起。 |
