H******i
发帖数: 4704 | |
D***i
发帖数: 199 | 2 赞！能否发份完整版（及出处）的给我？谢谢！
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 数据
|
f*******8
发帖数: 1430 | |
a**v
发帖数: 357 | 4 Looks like EB2 was getting screwed all the way to 2007, the numbers were way less than EB3 which took most spillovers.
So the EB2 backlog is NOT fundamental, but artificial. |
H******i
发帖数: 4704 | |
v*******o
发帖数: 37 | 6 Hi Helsinki,
Do you know where to find the comprehensive I140 data? thx |
k********o
发帖数: 1139 | |
J*****e
发帖数: 422 | |
y**********r
发帖数: 2004 | |
p********y
发帖数: 412 | 10 惭愧的说，没看懂。能给解释一下吗？这个adjustment of status是指递到485吗？要
是的话，怎么有2008以后的EB2的数据的？怎么比往年多？ |
|
|
a**v
发帖数: 357 | 11 Spillover went to EB2 after 2007.
Data in 2008 is for I485 approved in 2008 , not PD in 2008
【在 p********y 的大作中提到】
: 惭愧的说，没看懂。能给解释一下吗？这个adjustment of status是指递到485吗？要
: 是的话，怎么有2008以后的EB2的数据的？怎么比往年多？
|
H******i
发帖数: 4704 | 12
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 数据
|
w********u
发帖数: 832 | |
H******i
发帖数: 4704 | 14
【在 w********u 的大作中提到】
: 不明白
|
s*****c
发帖数: 753 | 15 It seems that China got close to 7% in 2010, and has more green card than
India in each of the years (2008-2010) listed. (table 3 in the first link).
What is expect from our fight (like 27%). Is that for using the spillover
from the rest of the world so that China can get over 7%? Or we want to
squeeze the FB or other category by using the 7% quota faster?
得烦了，就抛一个现有的数据先让我暂时满足一下，让他们能够有一点平静。
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/lpr_
: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/yearbook/2010/ois
: 这些数据本来就有，我代表NIU持续与USCIS保持交流，催促他们出新数据，他们被催得烦了，就抛一个现有的数据先让我暂时满足一下，让他们能够有一点平静。
|
s*****c
发帖数: 753 | 16 I did a little more investigation. The 7% pre-country quota is a limit
which they try to maintain. However, part of the family-based 2nd category-
F2a (spouse of a green card holder) is not subject to per-country limit.
That is the reason why Mexico took ~14% of the total visa number.
So, the upper limit for China is to get 7% + exempt f2a visa numbers.
However there are only ~700 exempt f2a visa for China in 2010. So there is
not much room to gain in absolute visa number. We as EBer can only gain
from taking visa number from FB.
).
【在 s*****c 的大作中提到】
: It seems that China got close to 7% in 2010, and has more green card than
: India in each of the years (2008-2010) listed. (table 3 in the first link).
:
: What is expect from our fight (like 27%). Is that for using the spillover
: from the rest of the world so that China can get over 7%? Or we want to
: squeeze the FB or other category by using the 7% quota faster?
:
: 得烦了，就抛一个现有的数据先让我暂时满足一下，让他们能够有一点平静。
|
