z**r 发帖数: 17771 | |
s******v 发帖数: 4495 | 2 CSCO肯定要和F5, ctrix, 或者另外一家宣布合作.
riverbed还有radware咋样?
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/ciscos-exit-adcs-sho : F5, OK!
|
w*f 发帖数: 111 | 3 I really liked virtual context on ACE. Cisco obviously didn't provide enough
R&D to ACE |
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 4 riverbed侧重于wan optimization吧,cisco已经砍掉waas了不是?
f5真心不错的公司,cisco要是买f5倒是也不奇怪
【在 s******v 的大作中提到】 : CSCO肯定要和F5, ctrix, 或者另外一家宣布合作. : riverbed还有radware咋样?
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 5 it brings less than 1% revenue to cisco ...
enough
【在 w*f 的大作中提到】 : I really liked virtual context on ACE. Cisco obviously didn't provide enough : R&D to ACE
|
a**********k 发帖数: 1953 | 6 15 billion dollar?
这个市场貌似不小。CSCO在L4-L7也买了不少
的公司了。
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : riverbed侧重于wan optimization吧,cisco已经砍掉waas了不是? : f5真心不错的公司,cisco要是买f5倒是也不奇怪
|
m**t 发帖数: 1292 | 7 A10 也在抢, 现在拿思科东西可以直接去换
【在 s******v 的大作中提到】 : CSCO肯定要和F5, ctrix, 或者另外一家宣布合作. : riverbed还有radware咋样?
|
s******v 发帖数: 4495 | 8 riverbed和J家走的很近,闹不好会被j买了。
听说,c和ctrix关系也很好。
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : riverbed侧重于wan optimization吧,cisco已经砍掉waas了不是? : f5真心不错的公司,cisco要是买f5倒是也不奇怪
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 9 cisco就买过arrowpoint吧。cisco貌似不算是彻底放弃这个市场,而是侧重于
virturlization。data center现在这么火,任何跟data center有关的都不应该放弃,
肯定是在下大棋呢俺觉得
【在 a**********k 的大作中提到】 : 15 billion dollar? : 这个市场貌似不小。CSCO在L4-L7也买了不少 : 的公司了。
|
f*****m 发帖数: 416 | 10 Most likely, it's the "physical" ACE will be impacted, just like WAAS. |
|
|
n**********l 发帖数: 271 | 11 virtual appliance? NetScaler VPX ranked No.1 in sales?? I played with it for
a bit and was not very impressed (compared to F5).
Any has experience with NetScaler in production? |
d****i 发帖数: 1038 | 12 主要是6500和7600两个老邦菜也快退休了吧。
不过现在思科怎么处处认怂啊
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/ciscos-exit-adcs-sho : F5, OK!
|
w*f 发帖数: 111 | 13 I think Cisco will be out of SLB.
if Cisco can not win the market of SLB as appliances, how to win SLB in
virtual world? |
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 14 这俩产品每一个都还有至少10年以上的生命期,而且还不断有新东西出来,离退休还早
。都一年至少一个B的业绩。
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : 主要是6500和7600两个老邦菜也快退休了吧。 : 不过现在思科怎么处处认怂啊
|
L******t 发帖数: 1985 | 15 6400 used to be 1B per quarter.
Even now it's 2B+ per year.
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : 这俩产品每一个都还有至少10年以上的生命期,而且还不断有新东西出来,离退休还早 : 。都一年至少一个B的业绩。
|
w*f 发帖数: 111 | 16 不懂了
还会有人买新的ACE吗?
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : 这俩产品每一个都还有至少10年以上的生命期,而且还不断有新东西出来,离退休还早 : 。都一年至少一个B的业绩。
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 17 cat6500 was the most successful device from Cisco, no doubt
【在 L******t 的大作中提到】 : 6400 used to be 1B per quarter. : Even now it's 2B+ per year.
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 18 Cisco退出市场但是在EOS之前,还会一直提供技术支持和RMA,所以,如果现在买,也
没什么,只要在生命周期里得到该有的支持就是了
【在 w*f 的大作中提到】 : 不懂了 : 还会有人买新的ACE吗?
|
d****i 发帖数: 1038 | 19 I think the plan was using asr1k and 9k to replace 7600, nxus7k to replace
cat6k?
Cisco is transitioning to linux based OS: IOS-XE for its routers. Neither
6500 nor 7600 could do that.
so there will be less and less features first available on them.
on the other hand, it is possible that in the future they run virtualized
ACE on an IOS-XE based box, but the performance will suck.
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : 这俩产品每一个都还有至少10年以上的生命期,而且还不断有新东西出来,离退休还早 : 。都一年至少一个B的业绩。
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 20 this plan takes decades ...
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : I think the plan was using asr1k and 9k to replace 7600, nxus7k to replace : cat6k? : Cisco is transitioning to linux based OS: IOS-XE for its routers. Neither : 6500 nor 7600 could do that. : so there will be less and less features first available on them. : on the other hand, it is possible that in the future they run virtualized : ACE on an IOS-XE based box, but the performance will suck.
|
|
|
a***n 发帖数: 262 | 21 There was one Cisco brief mentioning that there will be
some service box in ASR9k in the future. The service
box could do security...., just like Linux box module in
ISR?
I think the plan was using asr1k and 9k to replace 7600, nxus7k to replace
cat6k?
Cisco is transitioning to linux based OS: IOS-XE for its routers. Neither
6500 nor 7600 could do that.
so there will be less and less features first available on them.
on the other hand, it is possible that in the future they run virtualized
ACE on an IOS-XE based box, but the performance will suck.
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : I think the plan was using asr1k and 9k to replace 7600, nxus7k to replace : cat6k? : Cisco is transitioning to linux based OS: IOS-XE for its routers. Neither : 6500 nor 7600 could do that. : so there will be less and less features first available on them. : on the other hand, it is possible that in the future they run virtualized : ACE on an IOS-XE based box, but the performance will suck.
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 22 ism, a linux blade, currently is capable of video (CDS) and CGN
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】 : There was one Cisco brief mentioning that there will be : some service box in ASR9k in the future. The service : box could do security...., just like Linux box module in : ISR? : : I think the plan was using asr1k and 9k to replace 7600, nxus7k to replace : cat6k? : Cisco is transitioning to linux based OS: IOS-XE for its routers. Neither : 6500 nor 7600 could do that. : so there will be less and less features first available on them.
|
c*****i 发帖数: 631 | 23 他说的应该是另外一个,不过还没发布的,不好多说了
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : ism, a linux blade, currently is capable of video (CDS) and CGN
|
s*****g 发帖数: 1055 | 24 No matter what this big chess Cisco is playing, abandoning current customers
without announcing an alternative will surely lose some business.
【在 c*****i 的大作中提到】 : 他说的应该是另外一个,不过还没发布的,不好多说了
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 25 那就不是network service blade,而是application service了?
【在 c*****i 的大作中提到】 : 他说的应该是另外一个,不过还没发布的,不好多说了
|
d****i 发帖数: 1038 | 26 说来说去, 我觉得现在cisco太钓丝了
customers
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】 : No matter what this big chess Cisco is playing, abandoning current customers : without announcing an alternative will surely lose some business.
|
t*******r 发帖数: 3271 | |
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 28 进一步消息,果然目前看来是CISCO为了和CITRIX进行深度合作,放弃了ACE,而采用
NETSCALER ADC,以换取CITRIX其他东西。
看来CISCO还是更看重virtulization market,在已有的Nexus 1000V virtual switch
基础上,加上citrix的其他virtual SLB。这么做似乎有点道理,现在新建的data
center貌似很少有stand alone server了,都是VM。不理解的是,cisco既然可以做
nexus 1000V,为啥不能搞个virtual server load banlancer?
for
【在 n**********l 的大作中提到】 : virtual appliance? NetScaler VPX ranked No.1 in sales?? I played with it for : a bit and was not very impressed (compared to F5). : Any has experience with NetScaler in production?
|
z**r 发帖数: 17771 | 29 http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/101712-cisco-citrix-adc-2
switch
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】 : 进一步消息,果然目前看来是CISCO为了和CITRIX进行深度合作,放弃了ACE,而采用 : NETSCALER ADC,以换取CITRIX其他东西。 : 看来CISCO还是更看重virtulization market,在已有的Nexus 1000V virtual switch : 基础上,加上citrix的其他virtual SLB。这么做似乎有点道理,现在新建的data : center貌似很少有stand alone server了,都是VM。不理解的是,cisco既然可以做 : nexus 1000V,为啥不能搞个virtual server load banlancer? : : for
|