w***o
发帖数: 151 | 1 I have a question about indirect cost of an NIH subcontract, and am
wondering if it should be considered as part of direct cost of the host
institute.
There are languages in the NIH web:
“In the rare case of third tier subawards, section F.5 "subawards/
consortium/contractual" costs should include the total cost of the subaward,
and the entire third tier award is considered part of the direct costs of
the consortium for the purposes of calculating the primary applicant's
direct costs."
So what is the usual case?
Thanks | F***Q
发帖数: 6599 | 2 yes, it is part of the primary institution's direct base, but capped at $25,
000/year
search for "F&A Costs" on this page:
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/format-and-
write/develop-your-budget.htm | r**e
发帖数: 143 | 3 是primary的direct，但这部分可以不算在$250k内
25,
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】
: yes, it is part of the primary institution's direct base, but capped at $25,
: 000/year
: search for "F&A Costs" on this page:
: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/format-and-
: write/develop-your-budget.htm
| w***o
发帖数: 151 | 4 Thanks for reply. I realize the real question is:
Is my collaborator (a site PI)’ institution a 2nd tier or third tier
subcontractors?
thanks
25,
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】
: yes, it is part of the primary institution's direct base, but capped at $25,
: 000/year
: search for "F&A Costs" on this page:
: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/format-and-
: write/develop-your-budget.htm
|
|
