y****q
发帖数: 94 | 1 Farley recorded the halftime pressure measurements taken by the game
officials
as follows:
Patriots Ball Blakeman Prioleau
1 11.50 11.80
2 10.85 11.20
3 11.15 11.50
4 10.70 11.00
5 11.10 11.45
6 11.60 11.95
7 11.85 12.30
8 11.10 11.55
9 10.95 11.35
10 10.50 10.90
11 10.90 11.35
Colts Ball Blakeman Prioleau
1 12.70 12.35
2 12.75 12.30
3 12.50 12.95
4 12.55 12.15 |
y****q
发帖数: 94 | 2 Only four Colts balls were tested because the
officials were running out of time before the start of the second half. |
y****q
发帖数: 94 | 3 看看NFL怎么描述Colts的球：
Each of the four Colts balls
tested measured within the permissible 12.5 to 13.5 psi range on at least
one of
the gauges.
为什么不说：
扣子的四个球中，至少有三个在其中的一个gauge测量时，球压低于12.5？ |
y****q
发帖数: 94 | 4 为什么不说，拍子11个球的22次测量中，只有一次有 2 PSI的差别。 |
y****q
发帖数: 94 | 5 为什么假设扣子的没有测量的七个球都合格？要知道扣子的球，75%的球在其中的一个
Gauge测量时都不合格 |
b********2
发帖数: 55 | 6 Why did Blakeman always get a lower reading on Pats's ball than Prioleau?
Why did Blakeman almost always get a higher reading on Colts's ball than
Prioleau?
Talking about significant human errors?
Colts's ball was measured after Pats's, when they had more time to respond
temperature change.
Anyway, with the limited sample size, unknown initial conditions and large
measurement errors, it is hardly significant.
【在 y****q 的大作中提到】
: Farley recorded the halftime pressure measurements taken by the game
: officials
: as follows:
: Patriots Ball Blakeman Prioleau
: 1 11.50 11.80
: 2 10.85 11.20
: 3 11.15 11.50
: 4 10.70 11.00
: 5 11.10 11.45
: 6 11.60 11.95
|
h*********r
发帖数: 10182 | 7 最大的问题是没有开球前的读数。
从短信上看， 球压16都上场过。谁能相信拍子的球都是12.5， 扣子的都是13。如果真
是那样，那怎么解释扣子的球 球压也都不一样？
【在 b********2 的大作中提到】
: Why did Blakeman always get a lower reading on Pats's ball than Prioleau?
: Why did Blakeman almost always get a higher reading on Colts's ball than
: Prioleau?
: Talking about significant human errors?
: Colts's ball was measured after Pats's, when they had more time to respond
: temperature change.
: Anyway, with the limited sample size, unknown initial conditions and large
: measurement errors, it is hardly significant.
|
J**e
发帖数: 15008 | 8 两人换gauge测的，也就是说gauge自己的误差都很大。这件事多半是黑我拍的，有人举
报赛前还不纪录数据。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.2
【在 b********2 的大作中提到】
: Why did Blakeman always get a lower reading on Pats's ball than Prioleau?
: Why did Blakeman almost always get a higher reading on Colts's ball than
: Prioleau?
: Talking about significant human errors?
: Colts's ball was measured after Pats's, when they had more time to respond
: temperature change.
: Anyway, with the limited sample size, unknown initial conditions and large
: measurement errors, it is hardly significant.
|
p**********g
发帖数: 9385 | 9 为啥pressure总是一高一低，而且高的比低的高0.3-0.45,很consistent？
数据捏造的？看好goodell这次被kraft搞死！
【在 y****q 的大作中提到】
: Farley recorded the halftime pressure measurements taken by the game
: officials
: as follows:
: Patriots Ball Blakeman Prioleau
: 1 11.50 11.80
: 2 10.85 11.20
: 3 11.15 11.50
: 4 10.70 11.00
: 5 11.10 11.45
: 6 11.60 11.95
|
J***o
发帖数: 7166 | 10 fire grigson!
【在 p**********g 的大作中提到】
: 为啥pressure总是一高一低，而且高的比低的高0.3-0.45,很consistent？
: 数据捏造的？看好goodell这次被kraft搞死！
|
y****q
发帖数: 94 | 11 球压其实是很关键的，原来不是嚷嚷着说，多大部分都低了2 PSI以上，可是这个
Report一出来，大家没人关心球压了，还好PFT上有人指出了更多的漏洞 |
M******k
发帖数: 27573 | 12 你还别说，格里格深这次立下不世奇功，把拍子打入万劫不复，没准就续约十年，获终
身成就奖呢。
【在 J***o 的大作中提到】
: fire grigson!
|
